Author Topic: b-25's 75mm  (Read 2755 times)

Offline MWL

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #45 on: June 09, 2007, 03:20:09 AM »
Greetings,

  Who is the Ben of Insurance (Aflack) that all keep speaking of?

  And what does an Insurance Salesman have to do with a medium bomber?

  Perhaps, some sage of the ways of old can elighten this confused one.

Regards,

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #46 on: June 09, 2007, 03:21:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Serenity
Ben Affleck. In Pearl Harbor (the movie). Flew a B-25.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #47 on: June 09, 2007, 05:12:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Serenity
I DO hate the movie, and I dont know ANY actors in it. I didnt even know Ben Affleck was in it, I just put 2 and 2 together... Its a horrible, overly dramatized and absolutely unrealistic movie that spits on the name of those involved in the attack which lends its name to this filth. That is all I have to say on that matter. But I think a lot of people imagine they'll be getting 4 x 1,000lb bombs, AND a 75mm gun, AND CV capabilities on this bird, which is a load of crap. I just cannot WAIT to flame the **** out of all the squeakers asking why their "ub3r awesome affleck bomber cannot take off of t3h Tg!!!!!!!!11!!!ELEVENTYONE!!!"


Hey squeaker.
How about the guys with a bit of intelligence who voted for the B-25 for what it was/is?

Multi theater ac, that fills holes in multi scenario SEA events.

Anyone still complaining about how the vote went has the mentality of a 3 year old.

Waaaaaa I didn't get what I wanted.Waaaaaaa




Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #48 on: June 09, 2007, 05:48:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Hey squeaker.
How about the guys with a bit of intelligence who voted for the B-25 for what it was/is?

Multi theater ac, that fills holes in multi scenario SEA events.

Anyone still complaining about how the vote went has the mentality of a 3 year old.

Waaaaaa I didn't get what I wanted.Waaaaaaa




Bronk


Now, I must ask. Have I EVER said people just wanted it because of  Ben Affleck? No. Im simply explaining who he is. Am I against the B-25? No. I actually look foreward to it, as I do not like the B-26. I was simply stating my feelings on a MOVIE. And can you really argue that the majority of people who voted for the B-25 understand that it WONT launch off of CVs, and WONT be able to do EVERYTHING?

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #49 on: June 09, 2007, 03:27:33 PM »
It should be a nice ride, and even if it wont have para bombs or the 75mm "mostly useless anyhow" it will still be something new.

I think what will amaze people at first the most is..
1, How slow it will be
2, How poorly it will roll, climb and dive and compress at over 340mph.
3, How small of a target it will be for its given size.

Should be a nice shocker.


Wont stop me from flyin' it tho.


:aok
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #50 on: June 11, 2007, 09:51:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Hey squeaker.
How about the guys with a bit of intelligence who voted for the B-25 for what it was/is?

Multi theater ac, that fills holes in multi scenario SEA events.

Anyone still complaining about how the vote went has the mentality of a 3 year old.

Waaaaaa I didn't get what I wanted.Waaaaaaa




Bronk


:eek: Whoa :eek:

Thats harsh man, callin' Serenity a squeaker for just pointing out to someone else whoom ben aflak is (yes I know I prolly spelt his name wrong).  Especially when Serenity said that like the majority of us they think that the film was / is a travesty to the real heroes of that era, and understands the historical importance of said aircraft in question!

That said :)  I voted for the B-25.  I like that plane for numerous reasons, first and formost teh range of FSO possabilities that it opens up.  However, my first choice was the He.111 because I love the luft birds, and believe us LW guys need another crate other than the 88.  Not to mention its role in history.
:aok

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #51 on: June 11, 2007, 10:21:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DaddyAck
That said :)  I voted for the B-25.  I like that plane for numerous reasons, first and formost teh range of FSO possabilities that it opens up.  However, my first choice was the He.111 because I love the luft birds, and believe us LW guys need another crate other than the 88.  Not to mention its role in history.
:aok


Same here. Heinkel is my favorite, but when that was eliminated, the B-25 is just so sexy... lol

(Thanks for the defense. Bronk is just joking though.)

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #52 on: June 11, 2007, 10:47:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Serenity
Same here. Heinkel is my favorite, but when that was eliminated, the B-25 is just so sexy... lol

(Thanks for the defense. Bronk is just joking though.)



You are quite welcome :D

Offline LTARsqrl

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
b-25's 75mm
« Reply #53 on: June 15, 2007, 08:10:22 PM »
Warspawn:
Quote
Nothing more annoying than a 15 min flight (or more) into a base heavy, only to see your targets sitting on concrete with .EF ready in their text window.


Yes there is.

Try defending a base for hours, battling countless enemy that have the guts to come back and fight one on one.  Then to have one of the loosers fly for 15 minutes to drop 36,000 pounds of bombs on you from 200 feet off the ground.  Creating a kill zone 500 feet wide by about 1 mile long.  A tactical skill which most 8-year-olds excel in.  OR driving a jabo and dropping two 1000 pound bombs from 1000 to 5000 feet from directly overhead onto the top of a vehicle which even with a FAR miss will kill most vehicles.  But it's OK that defensively the ground units have virtually NO defense against it.

And yet more and more people want to have a "No Threat" way to kill ground vehicles.  A way to kill a tank with little or no chance of the tank or ground units being able to shoot back.  People will get into a fight at a V-Base and they can't kill a piece of armor when they are in a stationary Tiger firing an 88mm AP projectile.  And because the enemies they are shooting at are better shots in armor, they want a "SAFE" alternative.  SO, now they want to get into a bomber that can fire cannon rounds.  Knowing full well that it will take 5 or more direct hits of 37mm HE rounds coming from an Ostwind to kill their bomber.  But of course by that time they are long gone cause they came in a tree top level.  But the Ostwind threat is only there if some squirt with a pistol in his plane hasn't shot out the turret yet.

Considering the trajectory drop a 75mm HE round would have, I would think that the accuracy of this weapon would make it ideal for the broad side of a barn or maybe the broad side of a ship.  It would be VERY impractical against moving armor.  An M-3 killing tool I might be good at though.

As a Bomber though, I would enjoy flying it.  I enjoy the B-26s also.  But I think they would all be good targets for my German 88.

LTARsqrl  <>  :aok