Author Topic: LOL who would have thought it............. (Read 1787 times)

Silat · « **on:** July 02, 2007, 05:10:03 PM »

Guess lying is only bad if you are a dem. So much for integrity.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19570081/

john9001 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 02, 2007, 05:18:32 PM »

libby's lawyers asked for the judge to allow libby to stay out of jail until the appeal process was over, judge said "no, go to jail now", bush said "my club is bigger then yours".

rpm · « **Reply #2 on:** July 02, 2007, 05:32:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
libby's lawyers asked for the judge to allow libby to stay out of jail until the appeal process was over, judge said "no, go to jail now", bush said "my club is bigger then yours".

Why do you hate America? Why don't you support the troops?

Ripsnort, feel free to include some other Bushboi catch phrases here....

crockett · « **Reply #3 on:** July 02, 2007, 05:33:03 PM »

He learned how to do it from his daddy..

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/03/07/bush.pardon/index.html

rpm · « **Reply #4 on:** July 02, 2007, 05:53:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by President Boooosh
“The reputation he gained...is forever damaged,” Bush said. “His wife and young children have also suffered immensely.

Well if that's the standard we measure legal sentences for convicts now we should open the flood gates for convicts. I'm sure their families and childern also suffered immensely. Not to mention their reputation.

Speed55 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 02, 2007, 05:58:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
He learned how to do it from his daddy..

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/03/07/bush.pardon/index.html

Another difference between the Cox and Rich cases is that while Rich fled the country and was never prosecuted for the crimes of which he was accused, Cox admitted making false statements about collateral to back his loans, and served time in prison and paid fines for his crimes. --------Last paragraph of your link.

john9001 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:00:06 PM »

libby's sentence is on appeal, but libby is stupid, he should have used Hillary's whitewater answer of "i don't recall".

crockett · « **Reply #7 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:04:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Speed55
Another difference between the Cox and Rich cases is that while Rich fled the country and was never prosecuted for the crimes of which he was accused, Cox admitted making false statements about collateral to back his loans, and served time in prison and paid fines for his crimes. --------Last paragraph of your link.

So as long as you're rich you don't have to serve your jail time?

Specially if your daddy is a big oil guy whom donates to $200,000 to the Bush family's campaigns and then another $100,000 to the George Bush Presidential Library.

I guess that makes up for time served..

Yeager · « **Reply #8 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:08:48 PM »

tis good to be king

Pull!

crockett · « **Reply #9 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:12:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
libby's sentence is on appeal, but libby is stupid, he should have used Hillary's whitewater answer of "i don't recall".

Humm seems "I do not recall" has become the new campaign slogan for the Republican party. It's the line all the trendy Republicans are using these days.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IBvZlRqOTw

john9001 · « **Reply #10 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:12:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
So as long as you're rich you don't have to serve your jail time?

Specially if your daddy is a big oil guy whom donates to $200,000 to the Bush family's campaigns and then another $100,000 to the George Bush Presidential Library.

I guess that makes up for time served..

"On Jan. 20, President Clinton gave Rich a chance for a third "do-over." Clinton wiped all the criminal charges off of Rich's record with a presidential pardon on his last day in power. The Rich pardon has received special attention because Denise Rich raised and donated more than $1 million to the Democratic Party in recent years and also provided the Clintons directly with a $10,000 contribution to their legal defense fund and $7,300 worth of furniture."

get you facts straight.

crockett · « **Reply #11 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:23:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
"On Jan. 20, President Clinton gave Rich a chance for a third "do-over." Clinton wiped all the criminal charges off of Rich's record with a presidential pardon on his last day in power. The Rich pardon has received special attention because Denise Rich raised and donated more than $1 million to the Democratic Party in recent years and also provided the Clintons directly with a $10,000 contribution to their legal defense fund and $7,300 worth of furniture."

get you facts straight.

What facts are you talking about? I never said anything about Clinton not doing it. I'm just pointing out that all you guys that like to act as if Clinton was the only one to ever do it.

My facts are very correct that George Bush Sr. pardoned a convicted criminal on his 2nd to last day in power. It was pretty much the exact same BS that Clinton did. I just get sick of seeing right wingers flabbier at the mouth over what Clinton did.

Yet the very same ones ignore the fact Bush Sr did the exact same thing, prior to Clinton ever doing it. Now Jr has done it as well. Go figure..

So now it goes back to the same olé.. well Bill Clinton did it so it's ok Jr does it too? I understand you right wingers can't remember anything .. so lucky enough there are guys like me are around to help you out.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #12 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:29:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
libby's sentence is on appeal, but libby is stupid, he should have used Hillary's whitewater answer of "i don't recall".

Actually, I think it's the "I don't recall" that got libby in trouble. He was asked something early on in the investigation, and he answered it.

Later on, they asked the same question, and he answered "I don't recall."

And since the democrats were searching deep for ANYTHING with which to put someone behind bars even if they did nothing wrong, they automatically assumed the discrepancy meant that Libby was lying.

No one has 2 IQ points to rub together really believe that Libby committed a crime.

Elfie · « **Reply #13 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:34:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
tis good to be king

Pull!

Mel Brooks, History of the World......

x0847Marine · « **Reply #14 on:** July 02, 2007, 06:41:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
Well if that's the standard we measure legal sentences for convicts now we should open the flood gates for convicts. I'm sure their families and childern also suffered immensely. Not to mention their reputation.

But, but.. the rules only apply to us commoner serf scum, if you're a FOB (Friend of Bush) these rules are "excessive". Federal sentence guidelines called for the sentence Scooter received, so apparently Fed sentence guidelines suck? will the Bush commute sentences for all those "excessively" sentenced?? (nope)

Neo-clowns are special, and sensitive, a prison time you or I would get... is just too excessive for them, it makes them go poopy, its all scary'n stuff. Plus they wouldn't let Scooter wear his propeller beanie cap in prison, or let him have his blankie... Bush can relate to that.