Author Topic: Tank suggestions  (Read 2797 times)

Offline WMDnow

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 258
Re: Re: Tank suggestions
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2007, 10:00:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 64kills
your right but i would like to ad the sherman the ones that the americans used they have shorter barrels and do maore damage


British did more damage, duh.

Offline WMDnow

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 258
Tanks
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2007, 10:01:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's


No, we won't add flame throwers, absolutely no need for them.

Offline WMDnow

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 258
Tanks
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2007, 10:02:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 64kills
heres an idea just ask to be a designer and then do that


You can't just 'Ask' you have to be a friend of HT, and be very good at it.

Offline WMDnow

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 258
Tanks
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2007, 10:05:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ace8765
i have come up with a more revised list



M4 Sherman with rocket pods (rockets r short range but powerful if up close)
M5 Stuart
M3 Grant Lee
Wirbelwind-because of alot of suggestions =)
Panther
Pz-2
Kv-1
Matilda II
Panzer models 1-3
Katusha Rocket launcher   --- Yes i know its not a tank but we need arty dont you think???
Sfdkz Howling Stuka (german arty with the Sfdkz halftrack body)


M4 with those prototype rocket pods? Enough Battlefield 1942 secret weapons for you.  I'd rather have a Preist than a katyusha, better damage amounts.  Why Hanomag?  Which was the one the germans used in Africa?

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Tanks
« Reply #19 on: July 09, 2007, 02:15:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WMDnow
M4 with those prototype rocket pods? Enough Battlefield 1942 secret weapons for you.  I'd rather have a Preist than a katyusha, better damage amounts.  Why Hanomag?  Which was the one the germans used in Africa?


     Actually the Sherman "Calliope" was employed..just not very many of
them.



     The Hanomag was the main Wehrmacht halftrack during the entire war
with at least 22 variants .

     Not that any of these would be very useful with tanks capable of hitting
things beyond 3200 yards.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Ace8765

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Tanks
« Reply #20 on: July 09, 2007, 11:14:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rino
Actually the Sherman "Calliope" was employed..just not very many of
them.





Ty for the support guys

Offline Ace8765

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Tanks
« Reply #21 on: July 09, 2007, 11:17:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's




NO FLAMETANKS PLZ i alrdy had that chat with a senior member and he said that AHII doesnt need a flamethrowing tank (it would pwn too much when up close =]  )

Offline Scca

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
Tanks
« Reply #22 on: July 10, 2007, 07:05:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOIL
Did I hear someone say WIRBELWIND
I love you guys!!!




Oh boy...  You got him started...  

Just what we need.  One of these in the hands of an LTAR...sheeze..

They are bad enough in the Osti's..

Chant with me now "no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind......"
Flying as AkMeathd - CO Arabian Knights
Working on my bbs cred one post at a time

http://www.arabian-knights.org

Offline CAF001

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Tanks
« Reply #23 on: July 10, 2007, 04:06:43 PM »
Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!!

:t :t :t :t

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
Tanks
« Reply #24 on: July 10, 2007, 04:12:06 PM »
Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! :noid
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Tanks
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2007, 02:07:11 PM »
I still love you guys!!!!


rednex21

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2007, 07:08:17 PM »
We definetly need more British tanks.

I think the following would be good enought:

A12 Matilda II - 1 x 40mm main gun (67 rnds); 1 x 7.92 in BESA coaxial MG
A22 Churchill Mk III - 1 x 57mm main gun (57 rnds); 2 x 7.92 ^ mg
*A34 Comet - 1 x QF 77mm main gun (61 rnds); 1 x coaxial+1 x hull ^ mgs

Then American Tank:

M3 Grant/Lee - too many weapons to list(making it a beast):t

These are just some of my suggestions...i think all of them were already listed but thought I'd chime in with some info:aok

rednex21

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2007, 07:09:42 PM »
[/B][/QUOTE]

:O  We definetly need that!!!!!!!:t   I need as much Ground-to-Air help as i can get

Offline Ace8765

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Tanks
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2007, 03:58:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rednex21
We definetly need more British tanks.

I think the following would be good enought:

A12 Matilda II - 1 x 40mm main gun (67 rnds); 1 x 7.92 in BESA coaxial MG
A22 Churchill Mk III - 1 x 57mm main gun (57 rnds); 2 x 7.92 ^ mg
*A34 Comet - 1 x QF 77mm main gun (61 rnds); 1 x coaxial+1 x hull ^ mgs

Then American Tank:

M3 Grant/Lee - too many weapons to list(making it a beast):t

These are just some of my suggestions...i think all of them were already listed but thought I'd chime in with some info:aok


Comet... in map terms not much different from tiger
M3 ya
Matilda ya but no churchill...

rednex21

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2007, 06:00:27 PM »
You yourself said the Churchill and Comet.....just reinforcing.:aok

The M3 Grant/Lee was a bad tank.  This are the speicifacations i have on it:

Country of Origin: U.S.A.

Type: medium tank

In Service: 1941-1944

Combat Weight: 60,000 lbs.

Dimensions: lenght 18.5 ft.; width 8.9 ft.; height 10.3 ft.

Engine: Wright Continental R-975-EC2 nine-cylinder air-cooled
petrol engine (340hp @ 2400 rpm)

Perfomance: road speed 26mph; cross-country speed 16mph' range 120 miles; trench 6.3ft; gradient 60%

Ground Pressure: 13.4lb/sq in

Power-to-Weight: ratio 12.7hp/ton

Armour: 0.5in minimum; 1.5in maximum

Weapons: 1 x 75mm M2/M3 gun(hull sponson); 1 x 37mm M5/M6 gun in turret; 1 x 0.30in M1919A4 coaxial MG; 2 x 0.30in M1919A4 MG in bow(fixed mounting)

Ammunition: 75mm - 41 rounds

(the British version also had a .30 on the turret roof)