Author Topic: Tank suggestions  (Read 2538 times)

rednex21

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2007, 06:04:10 PM »
I also have specifics on other tanks....but not many.

Does anyone know of a book that has nothing but WW2 aircraft and Ground vehicles in it? (preferibally one that has most of the planes and tanks that were in WW2...not just the ones that had a major effect)

A website would do fine too:aok

Offline 64kills

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 475
Tanks
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2007, 06:21:45 PM »
you know how they posted that pic how do you do that with iy showing the pic instead of the x

Offline 68slayr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 712
Tanks
« Reply #32 on: July 13, 2007, 06:56:22 PM »
i would like to see the firefly re modeled or atleast its modeling checked...i have had them take tigr shells 800 on the side.  Then they turn there gun pop you in the face and you are dead

tanks would be nice but i would rather see the the LWs combined into a single MA ;)

Offline MWL

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
Tanks
« Reply #33 on: July 13, 2007, 07:23:24 PM »
Greetings,

  Here is a WWII GV site.  The author is focused on Advanced Squad Leader.  He does provide footnotes and references.

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/

Regards,

Offline Ace8765

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Tanks
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2007, 07:11:19 AM »
nice website
very nice

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Tanks
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2007, 07:57:37 AM »
Yep thats the site I use when looking up tanks.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline boingg

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
Tanks
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2007, 11:22:58 PM »
how about the Jagpanther   or the Jagdpanzer IV either would add some serious firepower along with the limitation of a turretless design maybe throw in the su122 for something different


Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Tanks
« Reply #37 on: July 15, 2007, 07:33:10 AM »
you talked about the M18 hellcat.

I would be for it other than the problem would be that it was lightly armored and had a vey small tank shell which was a 70mm round it could only blow up in the face of the tiger or panther.

we wont have it for that reason
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Tanks
« Reply #38 on: July 15, 2007, 07:54:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bosco123
you talked about the M18 hellcat.

I would be for it other than the problem would be that it was lightly armored and had a vey small tank shell which was a 70mm round it could only blow up in the face of the tiger or panther.

we wont have it for that reason



ahem 76mm with HVAP rounds?  Thing is with most US tank killers is they sacrificed armor for speed. 45mph is good and all but not when a M8 can kill you with one or two hits.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


VWE

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2007, 08:04:17 AM »
All you tankers need one good thing, a 500lbs bomb dropped on ur little heads every time you spawn... now go grab an airplane you dweebs!

storch

  • Guest
Tanks
« Reply #40 on: July 15, 2007, 08:19:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by VWE
All you tankers need one good thing, a 500lbs bomb dropped on ur little heads every time you spawn... now go grab an airplane you dweebs!
Tbarone and I did precisely that for most of yesterday.  I had a blast dropping 500kgers from my 110 of love into the cupola of the aces low crowd and preventing the recapture of several bases simultaneously.

Offline T99LMG

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 189
Tanks
« Reply #41 on: July 15, 2007, 09:16:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's


STOP POSTING YOUR BEING STUPID!:mad:  dont try to post everywere to raise your post number!:furious

Offline boingg

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
Tanks
« Reply #42 on: July 15, 2007, 09:19:50 AM »
any of the 251 series Hanomags would be a good addition  as an alternative to the LVT or the  M3  for troops   could have an armament package as well   some were dedicated pak vehicles others air defence  maybe add the 2.5 ton six wheel truck  to cover the soviet  troop carrier soft skinned and pretty useless in the light of the  mentioned 3600 meter main gun range   as far as tank destroyers the m 36 would be a nice addition 90 mm but a lightly armored turret


Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Tanks
« Reply #43 on: July 15, 2007, 12:48:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Larry
ahem 76mm with HVAP rounds?  Thing is with most US tank killers is they sacrificed armor for speed. 45mph is good and all but not when a M8 can kill you with one or two hits.

that is what im saying you can get killed with one bullet easy
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
Tanks
« Reply #44 on: July 15, 2007, 07:00:24 PM »
I want IS-2, Panthers, Pershing, and a Japanese tank.