Author Topic: Map idea (Read 2071 times)

ink · « **Reply #30 on:** July 07, 2007, 03:09:35 AM »

my first thought was "DUMB" its Mickey Mouse, but then i really looked at it and damm i feel bad for that first thought, it truly is cool there are all kinds of good "battle" spots,
more airfields though

DoLbY · « **Reply #31 on:** July 07, 2007, 03:13:58 AM »

Did we ever get Donut map back yet or no?

Atoon · « **Reply #32 on:** July 08, 2007, 11:21:39 AM »

Bad Cop=No Donut........................ still

MapMakers, plz dont give up!

I still think we need a map making contest & the winners get a job at HTC, anyone else agree? Or at least some free months of play.

WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET MORE MAPS INTO LWA ROTATION

Meatwad · « **Reply #33 on:** July 08, 2007, 11:25:55 AM »

I like it. We need something different then the same old 2 or 3 maps that seem to always be up.

Are all the maps in rotation? If not, then lets try that for a while and see how the public reacts

Laurie · « **Reply #34 on:** July 08, 2007, 11:53:12 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SFCHONDO
I'd change the name from Atlantis to Mickey Mouse Cause it sort of looks like him

Or Minnie mouse doing something unimaginable;)

Gryphons · « **Reply #35 on:** July 08, 2007, 01:19:13 PM »

Quote

Or Minnie mouse doing something unimaginable

NoBaddy · « **Reply #36 on:** July 08, 2007, 02:52:30 PM »

It's hard to tell without a grid on the map, but, it looks like a lot of the airfields are 50 miles apart(or more). I would suggest that you remove the gv fields and check the distance between airfields. The best way to do it is to put the airfields in first. Then add the gv fields. Since gv fields have remote spawns, their placement is a lot less important.

NHawk · « **Reply #37 on:** July 08, 2007, 03:00:11 PM »

Here's an unconstrained resize to a 256 x 256 map directly from the TE.

NHawk · « **Reply #38 on:** July 08, 2007, 03:06:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NoBaddy
It's hard to tell without a grid on the map, but, it looks like a lot of the airfields are 50 miles apart(or more). I would suggest that you remove the gv fields and check the distance between airfields. The best way to do it is to put the airfields in first. Then add the gv fields. Since gv fields have remote spawns, their placement is a lot less important.

You are correct, they are 50+ miles apart. That is friendly to enemy. It looks like friendly to friendly airfields are much closer.

Nilsen · « **Reply #39 on:** July 08, 2007, 04:35:13 PM »

I like the general design of it. Would prolly need some tweaking in regards to types of bases and were they are put, but overall i like it

Coshy · « **Reply #40 on:** July 08, 2007, 05:25:20 PM »

Are the channels from the ports, as well as the channels around the map, big enough for a cv to manuver? Or would it turn into 'Milkrun' the cv?

rednex21 · « **Reply #41 on:** July 08, 2007, 05:32:48 PM »

we definetly need more maps. And i like this onw a lot. With a few adjustments this would me my new favorite if it passes:aok

Good job whoever designed it......forgot ho ya was..i think it was FiLtH

rednex21 · « **Reply #42 on:** July 08, 2007, 05:34:58 PM »

^man i cant spell...but you know what i mean:aok

MotleyCH · « **Reply #43 on:** July 08, 2007, 06:49:31 PM »

I like the idea..but you should take this a step forward to realism. Here's just a rough drawing over your image.
I resized the image a little to bring the bays (ponds?) closer to the south one so they are about the same distance from each other.
Either way, I hope to see your map in the game next week

crockett · « **Reply #44 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:27:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SFCHONDO
I'd change the name from Atlantis to Mickey Mouse Cause it sort of looks like him

Before I scrolled down to see the whole thing.. I was thinking it's micky mouse..

Author Topic: Map idea (Read 2071 times)

rednex21

rednex21