Author Topic: For all you voters...  (Read 5848 times)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #105 on: July 26, 2007, 03:21:27 PM »
The conversion was the wings (total?) and the tailplane?
Or was there a nose/frontal issue as well?

AFAIK the 210 problem was all about control. Pitch and yaw?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #106 on: July 26, 2007, 03:27:51 PM »
Mainly wings, fuselage and engines. Minor changes to the bomb-bay and other systems.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #107 on: July 26, 2007, 06:18:00 PM »
Wings, and fuselage. Ok. Engines, DB603 from the start anyway?
Did they lenghthen it due to stab problems? Would be logical to fiddle with the tailplane in that case, but maybe a fuselage of other length would also make a good change in case of airflow?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #108 on: July 26, 2007, 06:26:29 PM »
Wings were bigger and completely new. Engines were DB 601 on the Me 210 (same as on the Bf 109E/F). The Me 410 got the bigger DB 603 to offset the increased weight and drag of the bigger wings and longer fuselage. The Me 410 has about 800 hp more than the Me 210. I haven't read about the changes to other systems yet.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2007, 06:30:55 PM by Viking »

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
For all you voters...
« Reply #109 on: July 26, 2007, 06:32:36 PM »

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #110 on: July 27, 2007, 03:26:06 AM »
Ah, the 601. So, in short, the 210 was "too little" for stability once that was cured you need more power.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
For all you voters...
« Reply #111 on: July 27, 2007, 03:41:31 AM »
HMMM   i'd love to have the HE-111  so i can shoot it down in flames.

The last BofB scenario was a bit of a joke trying to kill ju88's with 303's  a Heinkel however because its much slower would be easy meat.

I'm open to any new aircraft additions but Mossies need to be re-modelled and maybe another 2 variants added  ASAP.
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #112 on: July 27, 2007, 04:21:35 AM »
He-111 was a rugged bird though.
For BoB it is a must along with an older Stuka Variant.
And it's a must for the eastern front, but there you need a lot of other aircraft for filling up as well, - we only have aircraft for the late eastern front, and not even enough.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #113 on: July 27, 2007, 09:34:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
Ah, the 601. So, in short, the 210 was "too little" for stability once that was cured you need more power.


Yup.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #114 on: July 30, 2007, 05:26:54 PM »
So, done with the book?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #115 on: July 31, 2007, 09:04:12 PM »
Halfway done, although the rest of the book is pictures and technical things. Even Hollywood couldn't write a better soap opera than the production history of this bird. It even in no small way contributed to Udet's suicide. ;)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #116 on: August 03, 2007, 04:41:10 AM »
Iron man, you have betrayed me....
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #117 on: August 03, 2007, 04:58:24 AM »
I don't get the reference.  :huh

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
For all you voters...
« Reply #118 on: August 03, 2007, 10:41:03 AM »
Ah ... "Iron One, you are responsible for my death - Reichsmarschall, why have you deserted me?"

Udet's suicide note.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
For all you voters...
« Reply #119 on: August 04, 2007, 05:25:26 AM »
:aok
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)