Originally posted by Guppy35
I would suggest that underneath all this bring the MA back stuff is still the wish for the large multisquads to be able to get together and dominate an arena.
And again I'm of the opinion that the change was clearly for the better.
i am not currently in a squad, but i have no problem with them in any way shape or form. a tight nit squad is an incredible experience that you wont find anywhere else and i believe that it should be appreciated for the incredible creature that it is.
as for whether or not it is better. i disagree. and i believe that you are of a small but very vocal minority in your opinion.
that is not to say that there are not benefits to some of what has been implemented....but i wouldnt say that it is spot on by any stretch.
that said, my intention is not to tell HTC what to do. my intention is to address what they have done with the game and express my feelings about it....as a part of a larger community. i am not anti HTC. i dont think that i would still be here 3 years later if i was. i dont get some thrill off of biting on about things that i do not feel strongly about.
as a consumer, i have felt alienated by the constant shifts without warning, the periodic abstract shocks of gain and loss that have rained on this game since i began playing several years ago and the relative distance that HTC seems to be taking with regards to its player base. it almost seems a bunker mentality in some ways.
i just don't think it is a healthy environment anymore and i no longer get the sense that they are enjoying what they do, which is unfortunate, because how many people get to do what they do? how many people would love to?
of course you cant make everyone happy. its not possible. but is it wise to disregard the momentum of discourse entirely?
is it reasonable that i should have to pay in advance for changes that may just pop up? i do....but i have started to resent it a bit.
i remember an AH where there was teamwork. an AH where the war was the thing that sat as an umbrella over all things. you had a bit of everything and everyone doing lots of stuff...but it was all together as one. one community, one war...now it just feels fractured and uncalculated. it feels rushed and unthought out. it feels unsymetrical.
i understand that they are busy working on TOD (CT) but it seems to be at the expense of something that was really special and it's starting to feel like a broken relationship where the communication is no longer a part of the dialouge.
that said, i don't discount your appreciation of the current state of affairs, and i am certain that you are sincere in your views, but must that neccessarilly mean that those who do not share it are simply complainers who have nothing better to do? is it possible that it is the scale of the sentiment that enhances your view?
by saying that i am dissatisfied, i am expressing what i need as a person yes.
but i am also, by setting it with others, i am adding that need to the larger whole. i am also thinking of the others who would like to get as many people behind them as they can so that by some miracle some shift might occur which might actually deliver us from the stalemate of the status quo and into a better compromise.
if lots of people are still saying it after a year...then there just might be something to it. i think that there is.
so if there are alot of us that feel this way... in another view it is actually you who are expressing only what YOU want while discounting the needs of others right?
just saying.
88