Author Topic: Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car  (Read 1644 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #75 on: July 24, 2007, 02:36:32 PM »
angus... I believe that man has an effect on climate.   If natural factors are not too prevelant.. then we can probly affect the climate by 1-3% at most... if we are in a time of very heavy solar activity or volcano activity tho say... we have almost no effect.

The point is that when we were in a cooling trend from the 40's to the late 70's.. the scientists predicted a "man made" ice age for thirty years in the future... they did not take into account solar activity and we ended up getting hotter.   They really can't predict long range because nature always gets in the way of their "man made" model...  If you were to use co2 as a predictor at any time in history you would have been able to predict nothing... no long range forcast would have been accurate.

but now... based only on co2 they are predicting all sorts of things all the way into 100 years from now... And... you seem to be buying it.

You bought it when they said the oceans would rise 30' and still buy it when they say 3"... you buy it when they predict 5 degrees warmer in 100 years and you buy it when they drop back to 1 degree.

You admit that the rate of change is within historical limits but still claim it is man doing the lions share.   No time in any recent history has their been more solar activity.

and yet.. no matter how much they change their minds or their predictions you refuse to even show any doubt.

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #76 on: July 24, 2007, 06:26:48 PM »
Lazs:
"The point is that when we were in a cooling trend from the 40's to the late 70's.. the scientists predicted a "man made" ice age for thirty years in the future"

Our scientists predicted warming due to emissions. And turned out right.
(that was the early 1980's, and since we had some cool years the prediction was met with a grin)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #77 on: July 25, 2007, 04:07:02 AM »
Oh, when the globe flushed itself:
443 million years ago. uncertain cause. 60% of ocean species extinct.
374 million years ago. Possibly due to meteor and/or greenhouse effect.
251 million years ago. Greenhouse effect. 90% of land species extinct.
200 million years ago. Eruptions->Greenhouse effect. (sulphur related).
65 million years ago. Earth activity and/or meteor(s).

Are we going to do the next one?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #78 on: July 25, 2007, 06:31:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
ah... so you have nothing then hortlund?   I tell you that a more representitive graph... one that shows solar activity for hundreds of years and temp change shows that solar activity always leads temp change.. I point out that co2 always lags temp change and the now they are claiming that it is leading and you simply say... of course... but it is different now.
[/b]
Actually I have all the science on my side. What you have on your side is your inability to understand the science.

No one has ever said that CO2 triggers the warmings, but everyone agrees that it contributes to them, and that greenhouse gas forcing is the largest factor in the ultimate change.

Which brings us to the sun yet again. A 2006 study determined that there has been no net increase in solar brightness since the mid 1970s, and that changes in solar output within the past 400 years are unlikely to have played a major part in global warming.

So, we can conclusively prove that the sun is not the driver behind global warming.

Quote

I point out that the data being used is from stations that are wrong... I point out that the temp has risen and fallen much more in over the span of the planet and that solar activity always led the way..

You claim that the data being used from the stations in the US are wrong. To that I replied by giving you borehole data, which is not wrong. Your reply to that is to say "so you have nothing then Hortlund?" Your reply tells me you are completely unable to understand what we are talking about.  

Quote

You point to one tiny study hastily thrown together to counter the very real arguement that...

Well, see, here is where you have to accept the pesky fact that the "one tiny study" effectively sinks the entire "its the sun"-theory. In some cases, with some theories, all you need is ONE observation that disproves the theory to have the entire theory falsified. Im sure you dont understand this, but still there you have it. To further your knowledge on this part I sugges you read a book by a guy named Popper.

Besides, the two links in this post are both to solar studies, and both show that the sun is not responsible for the global warming. Sucks to be you eh?

Quote

ITS THE SUN STUPID


Remove the sun and there will be no weather or global warming because there will be no radiation for the atmosphere to trap. If you have no solar radiation, then you can change the atmosphere to whipped cream if you like, it wont matter. So yes, its definitively the sun.

However, if you remove the atmosphere of a planet you change how much heat the planet can trap. Similarly, if you change the composition of the atmosphere you can change how much heat it can trap. Depending on how you change it, the planet will be able to trap more or less heat.

This study shows that the heat available from the sun is not corresponding with the increased heat on Earth. Or to put it in laymans terms. Its getting warmer on Earth without a corresponding increase in solar output.

Since the solar output is not increasing, and the temperature on Earth is increasing, that means that what has changed is how much heat from the sun is trapped by the Earths atmosphere and that is the cause of the increased temperature on Earth. And, like I said earlier, the amount of heat trapped is changed by the composition of the atmosphere.

Which brings us to our atmosphere. We know that the composition of the atmosphere has changed over the past years, we know that these changes mean that more heat gets captured, we know that the temperature on Earth is rising, and now we can also confirm that this is not caused by an increased solar output.

Now, there you have it lasz. There you have the explanation. Every time you say its the sun, I will post this little explanation as a reply to that post of yours. I will even include a little counter, so we can all see how many times you must read this reply before you understand it.

Counter = 4

Quote

face it... you are in a panic cause your religion is about to collapse... it is gonna get cooler  you want to cash in on it by saying that you and your scientists and socialists and big government "did something"...  you can do nothing and... face it.. people are smarter than you guys think... they won't suffer over your unfounded theories.

Im a Christian, global warming is not my religion. Actually I think you are the guy in a panic here. Because you know that if global warming is true, we must try to counter it, and by doing that, we will have to change our way of life in many many areas. But you dont want to change your way of life. So tis scares the hell out of you, and therefore you are desperately trying to pretend that global warming isnt true.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #79 on: July 25, 2007, 08:12:02 AM »
hortlund... if one tiny little blip in one tiny little measure of suns activity sinks the whole "the sun changes temp" theory then...  what have you got?

The co2 theory is really flawed by that logic.   Co2 has always followed global warming not lead it.   There are also huge periods of higher c02 and lower temps.  

Solar activity is at it's highest.. the entire solar system is heating up... mars is doing exactly what we are doing.. how the hell does that have anything to do with co2 which at best is a result of global warming not a cause?

the oceans are heating due to the sun.. they release co2... when the suns activity and solar wind and cloud cover all come together to cool the planet... guess what?

The oceans will cool... they will absorb more co2.  

In the mean time.. enjoy the weather (much better than freezing) and the increased crop yeald caused by more co2 in the air.

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #80 on: July 25, 2007, 09:00:37 AM »
Well, like I said before, if we are ourselves increasing co2 as well as the sun adding up on it, we are in trouble.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #81 on: July 25, 2007, 09:10:20 AM »
angus... that is not such an insane position to take...

The problem is that most of the more sane scientists agree that we are maybe adding 1-3% to the increase.   We won't add anything at all to the normal decrease that will happen soon enough.

I think that all the hysteria is just going to cause a lot of problems.. I think the dishonesty and deception is so rooted that no real solutions or causes can be looked at anymore.   It is simply not allowed.

I think more harm that good is being done and will be done if we allow it, by the doomsday alarmists with their "do something now" cry.  

It matters not to these folks how many sink into starvation or poverty to get their way... how many die from ill thought out bans on things like DDT or how much or our water is poisoned by them telling us that MTBE is too important to do real research on... "we need to add MTBE right now to avert the disaster!!!!!"

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Eating Beef more harmful to Earth than driving a car
« Reply #82 on: July 25, 2007, 10:01:23 AM »
I think that many politicians are using this as a distraction, and don't know squat about what they're talking about.
But there are also some that have looked into it, and get shocked.
So, hopefully there is a point somewhere between ignoring as well as being ignorant, and hysterical.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)