Author Topic: this contry  (Read 1977 times)

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
this contry
« on: July 30, 2007, 01:26:20 PM »
im wondering

do you guys/gals truly believe that the towers were done by those we have been told it was done by?

me i DONT believe it.
does that make me unamerican?

building #7 fell four hours after the towers,
the owner admits to "pulling" that building. due to fire damage?
that is the biggest load of crap,


how many of you knew that building #7 fell that day?
 lots of people i talk to had no idea that another building fell that day

do research find the truth  if you want to know the truth its out there to be had.
TRUTH...  IF SOMEONE DOESNT BELIEVE THE TRUTH  DOES IT BECOME A LIE?

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
this contry
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2007, 01:39:15 PM »
There is NO WAY in Hell the Towers were brought down by the United States Govt.    That is completely asinine.

As for Building 7.  If you fail to understand the amount of force of which those two towers FELL, and cause "structural damage" to the surrounding buildings, then I cannot help but feel bad for you.  

Oh, and it wasn't a missile that hit the Pentagon.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
this contry
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2007, 01:39:17 PM »
It doesn't make you un-American.  It just forces me to lump you into the looney bin with the rest of the nutjobs.  Welcome to the BBS, just don't forget your tin hat.

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
this contry
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2007, 02:13:23 PM »
Un-American, no.  Uneducated.  Further proof of the complete failure of what passes for the American Education System.

Structural damage is not always immediate.  4 hours or 4 days, doesn't matter when a structure has been compromised.  Ever hear the noises of your house "settling"?  Consider that in a large and compromised structure.  Add to that all the heavy equipment being moved INTO that area following the collapse and the vibration effect of heavy equipment being used to search and extricate survivors.

If building #7 was intentionally dropped (I don't remember anything like that though from that day), it was probably because it posed a threat to workers on the rest of the pile in the area and could not be properly shored up (too big a structure to do that with anyways under those circumstances).  I know they were pulling people off the pile again and again for safety reasons throughout the recovery effort due to safety concerns for the rescuers (Rule #1, the safety of the rescuers comes first, otherwise you wind up with even more people needing rescued, and fewer people to do it with, and delays the rescue of the first victims even longer).

I'm sure you can follow some other conspiracy theories out there that are harder to so easily discount than any about the Towers on 9/11.

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
this contry
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2007, 02:20:40 PM »
It was moonbats.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
this contry
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2007, 02:27:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tedrbr
Un-American, no.  Uneducated.  Further proof of the complete failure of what passes for the American Education System.

Structural damage is not always immediate.  4 hours or 4 days, doesn't matter when a structure has been compromised.  Ever hear the noises of your house "settling"?  Consider that in a large and compromised structure.  Add to that all the heavy equipment being moved INTO that area following the collapse and the vibration effect of heavy equipment being used to search and extricate survivors.

If building #7 was intentionally dropped (I don't remember anything like that though from that day), it was probably because it posed a threat to workers on the rest of the pile in the area and could not be properly shored up (too big a structure to do that with anyways under those circumstances).  I know they were pulling people off the pile again and again for safety reasons throughout the recovery effort due to safety concerns for the rescuers (Rule #1, the safety of the rescuers comes first, otherwise you wind up with even more people needing rescued, and fewer people to do it with, and delays the rescue of the first victims even longer).

I'm sure you can follow some other conspiracy theories out there that are harder to so easily discount than any about the Towers on 9/11.


Yup, plus depending on how the building was reinforced, it would either collapse immediately, or slowly.  Building engineers can control this to whichever effect they wish.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline AAvenger

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
this contry
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2007, 02:33:30 PM »
It must burn you up, knowing that's where your tax dollars went to.

Offline Goth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
this contry
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2007, 02:35:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
It was moonbats.


Did it look like this?


Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
this contry
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2007, 03:09:07 PM »
Holy **** that's creepy looking...
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
this contry
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2007, 03:18:23 PM »
big oil did it so they could steal all of the iraq oil.:rolleyes:

Offline Speed55

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1263
And on that note....
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2007, 03:25:05 PM »
The world is most definitely "not" round... it's FLAT.

The truth is definitely out there to prove it too.

TRUTH.....IF SOMEONE DOESN'T BELIEVE THE TRUTH, DOES THAT MEAN I SHOULD PUT MY TINFOIL HAT ON AND WAIT FOR THE ALIENS?
"The lord loves a hangin', that's why he gave us necks." - Ren & Stimpy

Ingame- Ozone

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Re: this contry
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2007, 03:29:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ink
im wondering

do you guys/gals truly believe that the towers were done by those we have been told it was done by?

me i DONT believe it.
does that make me unamerican?

building #7 fell four hours after the towers,
the owner admits to "pulling" that building. due to fire damage?
that is the biggest load of crap,


how many of you knew that building #7 fell that day?
 lots of people i talk to had no idea that another building fell that day

do research find the truth  if you want to know the truth its out there to be had.
TRUTH...  IF SOMEONE DOESNT BELIEVE THE TRUTH  DOES IT BECOME A LIE?


I suppose you see black helicopters flying around your house and men in black suits watching your every move as well. :rolleyes:
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline x0847Marine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1412
this contry
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2007, 03:29:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
There is NO WAY in Hell the Towers were brought down by the United States Govt.    That is completely asinine.


The United States DOD has, in the past, drawn up plans for "simulated or real terrorism and violence on US soil....blamed on Cuba.." to justify war against Castro.

Sound familiar? terrorism on US soil to justify war against a boogie man?

I have no idea who was responsible for 9/11, but it can't be denied that the (republicans & democrats) people who run this country could be responsible.

Operation Northwoods
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Edit:
My favorite is "Operation Dirty Trick", truly disturbing.. but a reminder our .gov will stoop to any low... Dirty Trick was a plot to blame Castro if the Mercury manned space flight crashed... nice huh?

"The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al Cuba [sic]." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
« Last Edit: July 30, 2007, 03:46:56 PM by x0847Marine »

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
this contry
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2007, 03:30:27 PM »
the world is flat, i have a national geographic map of the world to prove it, the map lays flat on the floor.

the national geographic is an unimpeachable source.

Offline Speed55

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1263
this contry
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2007, 03:35:39 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin-foil_hat

I've got mine, do YOU have yours? :aok
"The lord loves a hangin', that's why he gave us necks." - Ren & Stimpy

Ingame- Ozone