The G14 is listed as having a top speed of 403 at 7000M and 326 near the ground. I've had trouble getting the G14 up to top speed at the reported alt. Seems to take for ever to reach 390 and even longer to get to the best speed i've ever gotten of 398. Others have reported higher top end speeds but I've never gotten as fast as they report????? Might be my throttle calibration?
http://www.adlertag.de/mainindex.htmThe K4 is listed as having a top speed of 452 at 7500M and 320 near the ground.
http://www.adlertag.de/mainindex.htmThere was a considerable loadout difference between the models.
The K4, IMHO, accelerates faster then the G14.
I've also read reports that the G14 was occasionally outfitted with 2 additional 20mm underwing gondolas giving it 5 20mm and was mostly used for ground attack.
The G10 was faster then the G14 listed at 426 at 7400M and also had a broader weapons selection like the G14.
IMHO AH needs the G10 for scenarios and Combat Tour.
My reasoning is the allied planes FAR outclass the G14 above 16.5K And the K4 30mm can be a REAL problem to hit with. The G10 would fit right in perfectly. Would probably be flow MUCH more then the K4 in the MA as well IMHO.
The G10 would fit in quite nicely and give those flyin axis a better chance vs the allied planes. It would make Combat Tour both more challenging for the allies and more enjoyable for the axis.
As it is now the 190's suffer preformance wise when flow much above 20K and the K4 with the 30mm flys GREAT, BUT that doesn't help you much if you can't hit anything with it.
In AH1 we had the G10 but it had the top speed of the K4 and the loadout capabilities of the G10.
I for one would rejoice if we got a G10 that did 426 at about 22K.
One of the arguments used against a G10 was it would be just another G14 even though the specs say otherwise. Also got the who flys at 20k in the MA argument.