Ok. We have to take this down to grade school level then I guess.
On the first page of this thread:
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Regardless if you're Japanese or not, how you use the term or what "inflection" you use when saying it, it's offensive to them. Why is that so hard to understand?
ack-ack
In direct quoted reply to that he got...
Exactly my point.
It's how you use it. "Dumb Jap" is one thing, but to just casually say "Jap" in a friendly way online is okay by me.
and
Abrreviating a word for online use is fine by me.
I find other words be to offensive and I will not use them.
The word Jap spoken in a friendly way is NOT offensive. If you use it in a derogatory way, then well, it's offensive. That word is an abbreviation.
Actually there's more in the way of argumentative replies, but let's keep moving.
So to show the weakness of the counter argument that is is OK to use an offensive word as long as
you (the person using it) didn't mean it in a derogatory way, AKAK presented examples using alternate slurs in that line of thinking. This shows how ridiculous that reasoning is.
(see satire definintion above)As AKAK said, your reaction proved his point. It is just as offensive "in a friendly way" to say "gringo", or "jap" or any other word like that. Meaning
quote "Regardless (of) how you use the term or what "inflection" you use when saying it, it's offensive to them." How so? Because you took offense to it regardless of how it was said.
Wait. In case you missed it, here's the point he was trying to make...
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Regardless if you're Japanese or not, how you use the term or what "inflection" you use when saying it, it's offensive to them. Why is that so hard to understand?
ack-ack
So there is nothing to debate with me about. Because you either just don't pay attention, or illustrating absurdity with absurdity is too high a form of making a point for you. Either way, I don't care because you are acting like a jerk.