Author Topic: Is this Constitutionally allowable? (Read 1259 times)

uberhun · « **Reply #15 on:** October 10, 2007, 02:49:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AWMac
Neighbour: "Hello 911....?"

911 Dispatch: "Hello what is the nature of your call?"

Neighbour: "I just witnessed a crime in progress."

911 Dispatch: "A crime in progress?"

Neighbour: "Yes, the people next door arrived late tonight with a carton of cigarettes, Marlboro Lights I think... and he has a Lighter too. They both been known to smoke."

911 Dispatch: "Good GAWD are you sure? Did you actually witness a lighter?"

Neighbour: *trembling voice* "Yes...." *whispering...* "Please save me....I'm under the bed... when I place a glass against the wall I can hear them....talking...."

911 Dispatch: "Please stay on the line... I've dispatched Local Officers, SWAT, CIA, FBI and Homeland Security Officials." "Please stay on the line and under your bed."

Neighbour: *whineful mumbling* "Okay, please hurry...hurry please..." *sobbing in the background*

It will get more stupid as the Libruls move on.
Film at 11:00.

Mac

lazs2 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 10, 2007, 02:58:43 PM »

mac.. that was the best bit I have seen you post.. very funny.

lazs

Shamus · « **Reply #17 on:** October 10, 2007, 03:11:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JBA
Just wait to see what they try if Hillary is elected and we get universal health care,

i.e.
you want that chemo treatment, OK first quit smoking.

How about that hip replacement, fine stop playing tennis.

It's already here.

Want to keep your job? stop smoking, cant or wont? you're fired.

shamus

JBA · « **Reply #18 on:** October 10, 2007, 03:11:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by cav58d
What a load of crap...It doesn't mention anything about traditional homes though...Are they included? If not, why just apartments and condo's? Are they using because of the proximity of other tenants, and sharing of systems (water, air etc...)

IMO it's must be bast on the bogus science about second hand smoke.

AWMac · « **Reply #19 on:** October 10, 2007, 03:13:20 PM »

Hey Lazs2 they only provide me with the material... I just piece the watermelon together.

This is what is to come in the near future.

Sad huh?

Mac

Prison Bubba: "What are you in for Son?"

New Inmate: "I was smoking..."

Prison Bubba: "No problem Kid, I just bought you for 4 packs of smokes."

Flatbar · « **Reply #20 on:** October 10, 2007, 03:41:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB73
but you do OWN a condo which is included with this.

Incorrect, you don't own the condo but rather just the airspace within. The structure is owned by who ever the developer/owner is.

JB73 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 10, 2007, 04:14:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Flatbar
Incorrect, you don't own the condo but rather just the airspace within. The structure is owned by who ever the developer/owner is.

I grew up / spent 28 years of my life in a condo, you don't just own the "airspace" you own everything inside. you can do whatever you want inside... outside is a different matter, but the whole of the inside is yours.

Chairboy · « **Reply #22 on:** October 10, 2007, 04:19:11 PM »

JB73: Can you remove a structural beam that goes through one of your interior walls and braces the floor of the condo above you?

JB73 · « **Reply #23 on:** October 10, 2007, 04:45:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Chairboy
JB73: Can you remove a structural beam that goes through one of your interior walls and braces the floor of the condo above you?

no condo above. 2 story unit with finished basement.

we could do whatever we wanted inside, move the stairs to the basement, whatever as far as I know.

Chairboy · « **Reply #24 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:01:08 PM »

What you know may need adjustment. The most telling part of your response, of course, is that you pulled back from a globally inclusive statement about ALL condos all the way back to a description of your own condo.

So no, you can't do anything you want. And to say that you own the 'airspace' is much closer to reflecting the reality of condownership than "you can do whatever you want inside".

Xargos · « **Reply #25 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:09:39 PM »

In Charleston, S.C. you are not allowed to paint your house without permission. So I guess this would allow the city to tell you that you can't smoke in your own home? This would also mean since you don't own the place the police can enter it without a warrant?

P.S. Next thing they'll do is make it illegal to read your Bible in your own home, but gays will still be able to have sex out in public. California is a cancerous State and should be cut out.

Chairboy · « **Reply #26 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:27:32 PM »

Xargos, before your hysterics make you faint, I'd like to note that:

1. Your bible reading in public is protected.
and
2. Gay sex in PRIVATE is illegal in a number of states.

AWMac · « **Reply #27 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:30:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Chairboy
Xargos, before your hysterics make you faint, I'd like to note that:

1. Your bible reading in public is protected.
and
2. Gay sex in PRIVATE is illegal in a number of states.

This explains the used Testaments in Public Parks...

Mac

Xargos · « **Reply #28 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:35:42 PM »

The point is that if you don't own it, the next step will be the police will say they don't need a warrant to enter and search. If they can infringe on your right to smoke in the place where you pay rent, what comes next?

P.S. Only thing our government should be doing is overturning old laws that are unconstitutional instead of making new ones that are unconstitutional.

Chairboy · « **Reply #29 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:45:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AWMac
This explains the used Testaments in Public Parks...

That what now is the who what?