This is not whining ( I dont do that ), simply an observasion and request for some insight from others who are more tecnically in the know and willing to entertain this discussion.
I am a die-hard P-51 fan (esp. the 'D' model) and I have spent a limited time trying to get to know the B model. It's an uphill battle for me. I really genuinely enjoy the flight model and find it comparible to my other sim experiences of the P-51D in CFS...It is a solid plane and rings true of comments I have read about her being 'honest' and forgiving. The words that Bud Anderson used about it being the plane that could make both good AND mediocre pilots seem better than they really are is not something that is shining through at the moment.
I have also flown the 109 and find it to be more enjoyable and deadly than the P51, which I personally applaud. I am glad for 109 pilots...
However, compared to many or most of the 109 variants, I find that the P-51 is outclassed.
I usually try to get my team as high as possible and find that we have limited success against the 109.. Pilot error on my part?--quite possible, but I think I am doing well by trying to maintain high speed and engage the enemy on my terms, staying light on the controls as much as allowable maintain momentum
wherever possible.
I also admit, that it takes me a long time to get used to a new flight model and perfect it. Other tactics I have tried include use of combat flaps, no flaps, trim, speed windows, alt., and various maneuvers and still havent completely clicked with the plane yet.
For the little experience I have had in the 109, I am a much stronger pilot in it...
My experience tells me the 109 (esp the G) is by far the stronger plane in most ways.. It turns better (so far as I can see), climbs better, has good enough momentum to stick with the P-51 on the straight and level (esp if you make the mistake of getting caught on the deck) has better acceleration, and can stick with a P-51 enough in a dive to often become a nuisance..but even at high alt I dont notice (personally) a marked improvement in the P51 vs the 109..
What does the P-51 have? The P-51 has better visibilty.
Team tactics aside, the 109K is a P-51 killer!
So what's my point? Well, it is simply that everything we read (at least as Americans) points to the P-51 as being the better (or best) plane in WWII. I continue to read from pilots that "it could do everything the 109 could, but do it a little better." This I have read from numerous pilots of the day..
So the question becomes, are they talking more about the "B" than the "D"? Actually, that's one question.
The next question is, that perhaps the P-51 won through glamour alone, associated with it's range ability to accompany bombers deep into Germany and hense turn the tides somewhat in the air over Germany. Is it possible that along with the press that made Americans proud and the Allies sigh from relief, that it somehow became the 'everything' plane in the minds of Americans? Kind of like the winner makes his own history?
The only thing that helps come to mind is that by the end of the War, the US pilots were probably the best trained in the world, employing tactics that acheived victories over an enemy that was told to tuck-tale-and-run (only to engage the bombers), whenever confronted by an Allied fighter. Of course, if you turn and run or dive from a P-51, you are in trouble. Is this what gave the P-51 is somewhat stellar reputation? A mixture of pride and better dogfigther tactics and training?
The last variable, of course, is the game and the flight model. I simply do not pretend to know enough to question the flight model, but what I see is inconsistent with what I have heard and read. Again, I am still trying to get the hang of this beautiful plane.
Interested to read others' responses...
EDIT: The reason i posted this was because of the DGS's