WOW!
The Anti-Reality Club (usually defined by politics and party affiliation) is thriving.
Denial and Ignorance= Never having to fix anything.
Preventive Maintenance = Never having to spend all your time fixing something in the future, that could have easily been avoided through denial or ignorance.
In the 70s they used a Indian with a tear to express that man poops in his own back yard.
Today they use scientific lingo and data.
Oh I see, because a particular person says it, and the term used is arguable it makes it ok to deny the core problem in the face of political affiliation. That's the saddest part of this whole thing.
If you remove the term Global Warming you still find that man is completely stupid, ignorant and victim to his own vises.
If you remove the term Global Warming, you will still find that where man pollutes the earth cancer is high, lung problems are growing, asthma is seeking our kids, and medical bills are higher and more frequent.
But, we must bow down to the fact, that since a certain person(s) says it, and uses the term Global Warming, that it makes everything "OK" and supports reason to deny it all. Not because it doesn't exist, but because "who" said it, and the term they used. It's not a fact that bothers some it's the messenger who brings it.
Point being, who here can point out to me what so wrong about breathing cleaner air, living on unpolluted land, and eating food from cleaner waters?
Maybe some throw twice as much trash out their car window to spite the messenger?
Pollution won't kill man, his ignorance will.
Even if Global Warming is a complete utter lie, the by-product of the "scare" seems to be worth it to me. Of course some people are glutens and would rather die of some cancer then even attempt to listen to someone who is from a different political party then their own.
IMO, The denial of Global Warming\Polluting the Earth is not based on fact, it's based on affiliation. Because the facts of what man is doing to himself are a bit over-whelming without the term Global Warming.
People who bring bad news are scary and dangerous, people who deny it all are even more so.
Screw the term Global Warming, is man not destroying himself? IMO chances are you'll die of cancer before Global Warming hits.
The Global Warming debate is not so much factual, as it is political. I think we will all find that those who deny it, also have a very strong political opinion, and probably argue every single point presented by the other side.
Animl
