Pakistan

[Bronk]

Arlo you have a pm

[Arlo]

Thanks bro. One back.

[crockett]

Originally posted by x0847Marine
81% related an unfavorable opinion of the US... btw the poll indicates US foreign policies is the root of the dislike...gee, imagine that.
 

Yea see that's the thing right there.. I could care less about a poll stat.. However that is the root of the problem.

You rarely ever hear these guys saying they hate Americans or hate westerner's just because we are westerners. They pretty much always put the blame right where is belongs with our policies and western govt's involving themselves in their business.

Maybe one day the people of this country will actually wake up and understand what our govt does throughout the world. We do a lot of good, but we damn sure do a lot of bad as well.

[bj229r]

Originally posted by SkyRock
The part that I quoted.  I know why you would use leftist, but are you saying that all scientists are leftist?

Sorry, missed this post...it was a reference to Moray, who is a scientist of some variety, who slowly but surely in various threads (notably the various MMGW), has shown himself to put leftist politics ahead of science

[Arlo]

Originally posted by bj229r
Sorry, missed this post...it was a reference to Moray, who is a scientist of some variety, who slowly but surely in various threads (notably the various MMGW), has shown himself to put leftist politics ahead of science

Well that seems .... opinion.

And as such:

So ... what profession inspired you to put rightist politics ahead of it?

[MORAY37]

Originally posted by Dago
This is about as stupid a response as I have seen in a long time on this board.  Typical left wing head up the arse response, reminds me of David Letterman talking to Bill O'Reilly and telling him he didn't agree with what O'Reilly says on his show, then later admits he doesn't watch O'Reillys show and never has.  What a fool.

Put you head in the sand Moray, listen only where you are sure you will hear what you want to hear, and do not risk an opposing view, lest you discover that there might be two sides to any story, don't risk that.  

 
No sir... you don't know me so don't label me.  I am not a left winger.  And, sir, there may be two PERSPECTIVES to a story, yet only one truth.

The difference is, I have watched Fox, and they blatantly lie.  Easily proven wrong, yet dolts such as yourself suck it down like the good little beetches you are.

[MORAY37]

Originally posted by bj229r
Sorry, missed this post...it was a reference to Moray, who is a scientist of some variety, who slowly but surely in various threads (notably the various MMGW), has shown himself to put leftist politics ahead of science

LOL... you're such a piece of work.  I put nothing ahead of science.  But, I'm worried about you sir.  Just because you disagree with me, you start labeling me, one way or the other.  Grow the hell up... high school is over.

[bj229r]

Originally posted by MORAY37
LOL... you're such a piece of work.  I put nothing ahead of science.  But, I'm worried about you sir.  Just because you disagree with me, you start labeling me, one way or the other.  Grow the hell up... high school is over.

Labels,,,stereotypes, all exist for a reason;)

[Arlo]

Originally posted by bj229r
Labels,,,stereotypes, all exist for a reason;)

That reason being rationalization. If you can rationalize something that wouldn't be appropriate without the rationalization then why be honest ?

(IE: They're different than me in philosophy and/or apperance and/or region so it's fine for me to rationalize my reasons for hating or my lack of tolerance even though that's one of the reasons we use to rationalize the way we feel about their behavior - accurately or not: circular/failed rationalization)

[bj229r]

Originally posted by Arlo
That reason being rationalization. If you can rationalize something that wouldn't be appropriate without the rationalization then why be honest?

wow say that ten times faster:huh

[Arlo]

Originally posted by bj229r
wow say that ten times faster:huh

That ten times faster. Not a problem.

[bj229r]

o it's fine for me to rationalize my reasons for hating or my lack of tolerance

Ok...I read the lower part...I disagree therefore I hate/am inTOLerant? We all disagree about stuff here, not sure that an opposing view qualifies as hate

[Arlo]

Originally posted by bj229r
Ok...I read the lower part...I disagree therefore I hate/am inTOLerant? We all disagree about stuff here, not sure that an opposing view qualifies as hate

I've never had a problem with disagreement. However people do seem to have a problem with my not buying their rationalization, their rhetoric or their arguments. Especially if they run out of ammo and get frustrated. It's kinda like ch 200.

[Ack-Ack]

The Taliban was created by the Pakistani intelligence service and exist because the ISI allows them to.


ack-ack

[Arlo]

Originally posted by Ack-Ack - edited by Arlo
The Taliban was created by the C.I.A. and Pakistani intelligence service
and are presently closely tied to the JUI political party. Their current influence in Pakistan is in conjunction with the Taliban insurgency.

ack-ack

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban