« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: whoops NoQuartr  (Read 1935 times)

Offline Connery

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 630
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #45 on: November 19, 2007, 11:38:45 AM »
can't we just all agree the collision model isn't perfect ??......No i didn't think so /shrugs.
Logged

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #46 on: November 19, 2007, 04:11:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Connery
can't we just all agree the collision model isn't perfect ??......No i didn't think so /shrugs.

*snicker*
The collision model is a perfect solution for the imperfect internet.
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline Solar10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 820
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #47 on: November 19, 2007, 06:47:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
Looks pretty conclusive to me.



Yip.  Thndregg's usual beverage was not available on the shelves so he had to go with some other magic juice.  Seems to have worked just fine, too.




;)
Logged
~Hells Angels~
Solar10

Offline FTDEEP

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 140
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #48 on: November 19, 2007, 07:39:03 PM »
i think the collision model blows! i think people try to use it to thier advantage when losing a fite. when losing a tight s turning fight if they are out turned..they will continue the turn hoping to ram..knowing guns wont find the angle. i think both planes should go down. i don't care what he sees. maybe next time they wont get so close knowing they'll also go down.
i get 99fps...with all graphics maxed out. i have cable and i lose 99% of the collisions. its not right.
Logged

Offline Dace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1443
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #49 on: November 19, 2007, 09:20:07 PM »
/\/\/\/\:rolleyes:
Logged

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #50 on: November 19, 2007, 09:21:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dace
/\/\/\/\:rolleyes:

Great post Dace, i'll put that one in the record book.....
:p

Regards,
Subway
Logged
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline SD67

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3218
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #51 on: November 20, 2007, 02:22:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FTDEEP
when losing a tight s turning fight if they are out turned..they will continue the turn hoping to ram..knowing guns wont find the angle. i think both planes should go down.


I've been hit many times in the rolling scissors so I know exactly where you're coming from, I don't think it was malicious though as you can get pretty close. I've also been guilty of misjudging the roll on the merge myself until figuring out the addition of a quick yo-yo in the roll can give a little bit of lag time to get guns on target.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2007, 02:26:27 AM by SD67 »
Logged
9GIAP VVS RKKA
You're under arrest for violation of the Government knows best act!
Fabricati diem, punc
Absinthe makes the Tart grow fonder

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #52 on: November 20, 2007, 05:03:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FTDEEP
i think the collision model blows! i think people try to use it to thier advantage when losing a fite. when losing a tight s turning fight if they are out turned..they will continue the turn hoping to ram..knowing guns wont find the angle. i think both planes should go down. i don't care what he sees. maybe next time they wont get so close knowing they'll also go down.
i get 99fps...with all graphics maxed out. i have cable and i lose 99% of the collisions. its not right.


So you expect the enemy to say " Well ftdeep is  too close to get a shot. Guess I better fly straight and lvl now".

Here is an idea. switch to lag pursuit till he gets a little separation.  He still going to turn as tight as possible (burning more mind you. While you are gaining a bit of E not turning so hard.

Difficult concept I know. I figured since you have such a firm grasp on the collision model. The above suggestion will be child's  play.
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #53 on: November 20, 2007, 06:37:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FTDEEP
i have cable and i lose 99% of the collisions. its not right.


Sounds to me like you are putting your plane in a position to hit another plane on your front end 99% of the time.
Logged

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #54 on: November 20, 2007, 12:00:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Donzo
Sounds to me like you are putting your plane in a position to hit another plane on your front end 99% of the time.


And he doesn't have VSYNC ON if he is getting 99 fps ... that could be part of his problem too.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #55 on: November 20, 2007, 12:35:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
And he doesn't have VSYNC ON if he is getting 99 fps ... that could be part of his problem too.


99 fps.  99% of collisions lost.  See a pattern here?  maybe a little embelishment?
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
whoops NoQuartr
« Reply #56 on: November 20, 2007, 03:15:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BaldEagl
99 fps.  99% of collisions lost.  See a pattern here?  maybe a little embelishment?



mmmmm ... just a tinch ...  :D
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »