Originally posted by Rich46yo
1, Ok, but on this map I can count 9 bases with overlapping radars and dont ever remember so many on the old maps. So, like, the old maps could have bases averaging 1 sector apart, and this map could average 3/4th sector apart, and the big map would have more bases right?
Yes, big maps will have more bases. And actually, I think I may have mis-remembered.
I think airfields need to be 3/4 sector apart, but V-bases can be closer. This is where you see dar rings overlapping. I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong.
Originally posted by Rich46yo
2, Its not my "only measure". Quit putting words in my mouth.
I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, just pointing out that it isn't something to be overly concerned about. Before the arena split, resets were actually a fairly rare occurrence. To newer players, a map that is "impossible to reset" might be disconcerting, but it shouldn't be.
Originally posted by Rich46yo
3, You arent soupcan. Nor are you me. So why are you commenting?
Soupcan is actually a squaddie of mine. Try to keep up.
Originally posted by Rich46yo
Try reading the entire thread next time. And btw you didnt answer any of my questions.
So, you would rather have all your questions answered instead of have any kind of dialogue? Fine.
No, the large map is not Uterus X8. Uterus devolves into stagnant, narrow fronts. The large maps are anything but stagnant. There is no comparison.
We need large maps for the same reason we need lots of small ones . . . variety.
Will they ever be "won"? Probably at some point.
I already answered your question about density.
Finally, if stating your opinion is all that you are doing, then no, it is not a "whine." However, the fact you choose to be pissy with everyone who disagrees with you does speak volumes about your thin skin, thus I fully expect you will eventually devolve into full whine mode.
Now that I have given you all the answers, all commentary from you must cease.
