« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: A new take on Hillary?  (Read 778 times)

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
A new take on Hillary?
« on: December 13, 2007, 09:49:33 AM »
Someone did a little home work on Hillary?

Seems that way!

This article SEEMS to say a considerable amount about her political philosophy...

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/13/hillary-clinton-cultural-marxist/

AND it seem to fit right in with several of her quotes.
Logged
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2007, 10:14:52 AM »
I don't like Hillary, but who gives a crap what she did 38 years ago while she was at Yale?
Logged

Offline RATTFINK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2007, 10:25:48 AM »
Logged
Hitting trees since tour 78

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2007, 10:26:55 AM »
That article is complete crap. Political propoganda at its worst.

This is the kind of "swiftboat" tactics that deminishes our political process to idiocy. I find it sad and repelling that anyone would take this kind of article seriously.
Logged

Offline ChickenHawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1010
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2007, 11:11:59 AM »
If you don't like Hillary, there is plenty of ammo available without writing a weak and pathetic commentary like this.

You need to fine another site to post articles from, this one is getting a little stale.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2007, 11:36:50 AM by ChickenHawk »
Logged
Do not attribute to malice what can be easily explained by incompetence, fear, ignorance or stupidity, because there are millions more garden variety idiots walking around in the world than there are blackhearted Machiavellis.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13291
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2007, 11:15:39 AM »
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent. With regard to Hillary though, it's one thing to politically murder your opponent and quite another to murder your political opponent.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2007, 12:04:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent. With regard to Hillary though, it's one thing to politically murder your opponent and quite another to murder your political opponent.


Correct.  The most deplorable side of the swiftboat tactics is the truth.  Democrats can't stand it.
Logged
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2007, 12:38:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent.


If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.
Logged

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2007, 12:41:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.


kerry's testimony before congress was dishonorable and untruthful.
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13291
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2007, 01:17:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.


It was only dishonorable if it wasn't true. What part wasn't true exactly?
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2007, 01:32:30 PM »
Kerry is an ***hat with no equal.  He got taken out for being a traitor to his men and his country.  It is a sad legacy that john kerry has forever damaged through both word and deed the honor and sacrifice of all Swiftboat crews.
Logged
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2007, 01:35:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
It was only dishonorable if it wasn't true. What part wasn't true exactly?


Look up Winter Soldiers (I think it was).
Logged
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13291
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2007, 02:01:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Look up Winter Soldiers (I think it was).


Nothing there disproving the "swift boaters" claims against JK.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2007, 02:07:13 PM »
wait a minute..   you guys defending her are not trying to say that she isn't a marxist are you?

lazs
Logged

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
A new take on Hillary?
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2007, 02:12:37 PM »
She isn't a marxist.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »