Originally posted by E25280
My post was in response to someone elses hypothetical. That hypothetical was if Turkey in effect ignored their NATO allies' limitations and tried for a bona-fide landgrab in northern Iraq.
And my response to you was exactly within that context: If Turkey invades north Iraq and occupy the Kurdish parts of Iraq including the oilfields and pipeline.
You made a series of uneducated mistakes in your assumptions that Turkey would face serious repercussions if they did invade.
1. You failed to realize that NATO has no power/jurisdiction whatsoever beyond the European and North American continents (+Greece and Turkey). Turkey and the USA could very well go to war with each other, and as long as the war is fought outside Europe/America NATO has no mandate to get involved.
2. There are no provisions in the NATO Charter to expel a member nation for whatever reason. Membership is voluntary, so is leaving the alliance. If you don’t believe me read the treaty for yourself:
http://www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/treaty.htm3. You actually though that Europe and Europeans care more for the Kurds than we care for a good relationship with Turkey. That we would expel Turkish nationals!

I can assure you that if Turkey invades Iraq the worst they can expect from Europe is a couple of carefully worded diplomatic letters expressing our displeasure. Say … more of the same that we gave you people when you invaded Iraq.
Originally posted by E25280
How nice of you to try to move the goalposts for the original poster, instead of minding your own business. Further proof you can not control your trollish nature.
I did no such thing. You’re just too dimwitted to follow a simple line of discussion.