Author Topic: Tiger Attack In S.F.! (Read 3138 times)

SIK1 · « **Reply #60 on:** January 18, 2008, 09:43:10 AM »

and the Darwin award goes to...

lazs2 · « **Reply #61 on:** January 18, 2008, 10:07:46 AM »

the police should have shot the person who was in charge of the zoo.

He allowed people to see a tiger who could get loose and eat em.

lazs

68ROX · « **Reply #62 on:** January 18, 2008, 12:08:10 PM »

The buttnuggetts in question are changing their story...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,323714,00.html

Admit to having been high on weed and one was twice the legal limit on alcohol....and...

...yes...were taunting the tiger.

68ROX

Russian · « **Reply #63 on:** January 18, 2008, 12:29:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68ROX

...yes...were taunting the tiger.

68ROX

So now it is mandatory in all zoos in USA to have a sign with "don't taunt the tiger"?

68ROX · « **Reply #64 on:** January 18, 2008, 12:47:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Russian
So now it is mandatory in all zoos in USA to have a sign with "don't taunt the tiger"?

Yes...

Because in the Era of "We have absolutely no phreeking common sense" you even have to put "CAUTION: This coffee is HOT" on the cup.

68ROX

VonMessa · « **Reply #65 on:** January 18, 2008, 12:56:12 PM »

I say Mr. Tiger.

Just a hungry cat. It's a shame he couldn't eat all of the "courses" of his meal before he was rudely interrupted!

SIK1 · « **Reply #66 on:** January 18, 2008, 01:10:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68ROX
Yes...

Because in the Era of "We have absolutely no phreeking common sense" you even have to put "CAUTION: This coffee is HOT" on the cup.

68ROX

Remember this is San Francisco we are talking about here. Not only are they lacking in common sence, but the concept of personal responsability does not exist in that town.

lazs2 · « **Reply #67 on:** January 18, 2008, 01:18:53 PM »

It doesn't matter to me that they were "taunting" the tiger.

the real point is that the containment was not good enough to keep in a tiger who wanted out... It not only put the morons in danger but every person in the zoo at the time.

lazs

myelo · « **Reply #68 on:** January 18, 2008, 01:18:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Russian
So now it is mandatory in all zoos in USA to have a sign with "don't taunt the tiger"?

No, it's mandatory that all zoos in the USA be constructed such that animals cannot escape their exhibit and get into the visitor area.

lazs2 · « **Reply #69 on:** January 18, 2008, 01:26:53 PM »

exactly..

lazs

clerick · « **Reply #70 on:** January 18, 2008, 04:42:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by myelo
No, it's mandatory that all zoos in the USA be constructed such that animals cannot escape their exhibit and get into the visitor area.

The local TV news interviewed the zoologist from the Minnesota Zoo who was responsible for writing the standards for tiger cages. According to him the older pens were built under older guidelines and newer pens follow a new stricter standard.

He expressed doubts that a tiger should be able to get out of the pen without help. In the same piece it was stated that the kid may have actually had his legs in the cage and the tiger may have latched onto him and used him to climb out. What a way to go...

MiloMorai · « **Reply #71 on:** January 18, 2008, 05:44:17 PM »

read this, http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?t=3758

clerick · « **Reply #72 on:** January 18, 2008, 05:54:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MiloMorai
read this, http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?t=3758

OF COURSE! I hadn't realized that the tiger, the zoo AND the news were ALL biased against people of mid-eastern descent... hardly worth the bytes to respond to that.

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #73 on:** January 18, 2008, 06:54:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by myelo
No, it's mandatory that all zoos in the USA be constructed such that animals cannot escape their exhibit and get into the visitor area.

But the specifications for building the exhibit aren't mandatory and are just recommendations. The exhibit in the SF Zoo was four feet lower than the recommended minimum for the wall enclosure. That's a major problem, it shouldn't be a recommendation but a requirement.

ack-ack

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #74 on:** January 18, 2008, 06:58:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by clerick
OF COURSE! I hadn't realized that the tiger, the zoo AND the news were ALL biased against people of mid-eastern descent... hardly worth the bytes to respond to that.

Someone should posts and say whether or not someone is of Middle-Eastern, Jewish, Christian or of any other race or religion, they all taste like chicken to a tiger.

ack-ack