Angry White Man: The bigoted past of Ron Paul

[Wotan]

Ron Paul and stormfront owner Don Black.

You naive sucker - that's obviously photoshopped...

[SIG220]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
Could be...don't shoot the messenger.

It is better to just throw them down a well, like the ancient Greeks did to the messengers from King Xerxes.

SIG 220

[SIG220]

Originally posted by Xargos
You must be black to belong to the same church as Obama.  But I guess since he's black he can't be a racist right?

http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

Wow, the more I learn about Obama, the more I am having second thoughts about him being better than Hillary.

According to this report, Obama's church teaches Black Supremacy!!  That would make Obama a clear racist, if he supports these views!!

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/03/columnist_says_obamas_church_h.php

This is really most odd, as Obama's mother was white, and he was raised by her and her white parents ( his grandparents ).

So I had thought that Obama was really a White man, since he was raised by an all white family.

SIG 220

[SIG220]

Originally posted by Wotan
You naive sucker - that's obviously photoshopped...

That is so obvious.  Just look at the lighting on Ron Paul, and how there is a shadow caused by his head.   Then compare that to the two others.

Obviously they were not in the same room together.

It is amazing how dirty politics is, isn't it???


SIG 220

[Tango]

Umm, no.

They are both facing different directions. So the lighting is correct.

Another thing is look at the light on the tips of thier noses. Its the same.

Also there was another pic of RP signing an autograph for the guys son.

[SIG220]

Originally posted by Tango
Umm, no.

They are both facing different directions. So the lighting is correct.

Another thing is look at the light on the tips of thier noses. Its the same.

Also there was another pic of RP signing an autograph for the guys son.

Is photography one of your major hobbies?   People standing right next to one another are generally going to be under the same lighting.  The other two are obviously not under the same lighting that he is.   If they were, you would see a similar contrast and shadow, as you do on Ron Paul.   The difference is most apparent.

The photo is also very blurry.   Blur effects are often used to conceal editing.  And all info inside the .JPG file has been stripped regarding its source, too.   That is often done with Photoshopped files, to conceal the fact that Photoshop edited the image.

Finally, you have linked this photo from a blog that constantly bashes Ron Paul.   It is not from any reliable or credible source.   Instead, it is from some anonymous blog that clearly has its own political agenda to attack Paul.

The Blog does not even identify who operates it, other than apparently it is someone named Charles.   No full name, no address, or phone number is provided.  And if you look at the Blog in more detail, you will see that there is even a library of cartoons and photoshopped images on the site.   Hmm, tell me, does that say anything??

BTW, I am no fan at all of Ron Paul myself, and would never vote for him.  

SIG 220

[Tango]

First of all I didn't link this I simply looked at the picture [that someone else posted] and can tell.

As for "Is photography one of your major hobbies?" , no its not my hobby. I have a bachelors degree from Louisiana Tech in photography and make my living photographing people. How many hours do you spend in the studio?

[Wotan]

Is photography one of your major hobbies? People standing right next to one another are generally going to be under the same lighting. The other two are obviously not under the same lighting that he is. If they were, you would see a similar contrast and shadow, as you do on Ron Paul. The difference is most apparent.

The photo is also very blurry. Blur effects are often used to conceal editing. And all info inside the .JPG file has been stripped regarding its source, too. That is often done with Photoshopped files, to conceal the fact that Photoshop edited the image.

Finally, you have linked this photo from a blog that constantly bashes Ron Paul. It is not from any reliable or credible source. Instead, it is from some anonymous blog that clearly has its own political agenda to attack Paul.

The Blog does not even identify who operates it, other than apparently it is someone named Charles. No full name, no address, or phone number is provided. And if you look at the Blog in more detail, you will see that there is even a library of cartoons and photoshopped images on the site. Hmm, tell me, does that say anything??

BTW, I am no fan at all of Ron Paul myself, and would never vote for him.

SIG 220

That photo is not 'faked' - its the real deal. My reply:

You naive sucker - that's obviously photoshopped...

- was just sarcasm in response to the other two idiots.

Don Black isn't the only racist to have been photographed standing next to Ron Paul. As I said it's not that important to me whether or not Ron Paul is a 'racist / extremists' but it does under score my opinion that he says one thing but in reality he does the opposite. He says he  doesn't 'embrace' the beliefs of those racists but can be seen 'embracing' them in photo-ops as long as they have cash in hand.

Ron Paul is the worst type of charlatan...

[lazs2]

of course affirmative action and all black churches and any extra rights are racism.. the entire democratic party is built on the politics of envy and class warfare and.. it is an extremely racist party.   It will condone any amount of racism so long as the goal of socialism is met.

A level playing field to democrats means that everyone should be as poor and as useless as the most poor and useless person in the country...  any country.

lazs

[moot]

The only likely "good" reason for this thing is that RP did his usual nice guy routine, trying to convince even the least likely (e.g. playing with his cards on the table on TV interviews where the anchor is set to make him look bad) people of his perspective.
It's not that unbelievable an "alibi", but frankly WTF is he doing with people like that, nevermind posing for pictures?  Did they go to him, or was it just a chance meeting?

[lazs2]

democrats pose with some of the worst racists in the country.. the sharptons and the jacksons and even some la raza types all the time and no one even blinks.

lazs

[moot]

He must really be out there in platonia to not realize there's nothing to gain from standing next to those people..

[Wotan]

democrats pose with some of the worst racists in the country.. the sharptons and the jacksons and even some la raza types all the time and no one even blinks.

lazs

Yes but every rational and right thinking person can see those folks for what they are.

People aren't sure, or aware, of Ron Paul. Since this thread is dealing with 'Ron Paul' - let's stick to him. If you keep banging that 'lefties are bad drum' eventually you will go deaf - or the rest of us will.

He must really be out there in platonia to not realize there's nothing to gain from standing next to those people..

Ron Paul has always been the darling of the 'council on foreign relations', trilateralists', 'militia', 'racist', and 'right-wing reactionary' conspiracy kooks. The racist like Don Black didn't just discover Ron Paul now that he is running for the Republican nomination and Ron Paul isn't unaware of the background of the folks he is photographed with.

[Chairboy]

Wotan, can you provide any quotes by Ron Paul that support your assertion that he's racist?  Or does your argument rest entirely on the logical fallacy of guilt by association?

[Wotan]

Wotan, can you provide any quotes by Ron Paul that support your assertion that he's racist?

First, why don't you quote where I wrote, or asserted, that 'Ron Paul is a racist'.

Typical strawman...