Author Topic: Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB  (Read 2222 times)

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2008, 05:25:15 PM »
I also agree that the small boats are a threat. I think we have seen from the Cole attack just what a small boat can do. With that said it seems that they are doing this quite often, and this event was blown out for the media, so the admin could take full advantage of it.

Not to mention a small boat could be rigged with a torpedo system that could be used much like PT boats were used in WW2. So they are a threat, but I think this incident was taken advantage of.

I do find it ironic that while Bush was in the middle east, visiting a terrorist nation that we call our buddies (Saudi Arabia). It's quite nice to see that he quietly approved the arms deal that will have the US supplying Saudi with a bunch of US made weapons.

One might go so far to say, as long as there is a "perceived" threat from some rogue nation like Iran, it's likely very good for business in the US arms market. Kinda hard to sell massive amounts of weapons in peace time with no threats.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2008, 05:28:52 PM by crockett »
"strafing"

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2008, 05:26:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Ill considered?

I've been at sea in a warship in the Persian Gulf. I know the drill.


LOL

pwned
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline saad

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2008, 07:22:40 PM »
See Rule #5
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:34:03 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline BiGBMAW

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2008, 07:34:52 PM »
You Know... I heard John "Hanoi" Kerry was at Sea too....

I'm sure just because someone served in the military, they are truly experts in all things warfare

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2008, 07:48:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Ill considered?

I've been at sea in a warship in the Persian Gulf. I know the drill.


What bothers me in this case is reports that some of these Iranian boats got within 200 yards.. That's too close, about 10 seconds distant at 40 knots on a perpendicular course. When I read that, I wondered why they didn't dissuade them sooner. Personally, I think the local commander should have been more aggressive in keeping the Iranians at a greater distance. I believe the Pentagon thinks so as well.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2008, 08:10:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by saad
See Rule #5

Could you possibly know any less of what you're talking about?
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:34:42 PM by Skuzzy »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2008, 08:27:04 PM »
See Rule #5
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:35:05 PM by Skuzzy »
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2008, 09:19:44 PM »
The ROE are at this time unknown and I'm sure will not be broadcast in detail. Speculating about them from the perspective of home and on a computer game forum is kinda silly. I'll trust the folks who are there now to follow the procedures set to allow them to continue their mission.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2008, 09:42:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
The ROE are at this time unknown and I'm sure will not be broadcast in detail. Speculating about them from the perspective of home and on a computer game forum is kinda silly. I'll trust the folks who are there now to follow the procedures set to allow them to continue their mission.


Smartest post in this entire thread.
sand

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2008, 09:44:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
See Rule #5


No sir... It also means I know more about it than you.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:35:30 PM by Skuzzy »
sand

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #25 on: January 17, 2008, 10:00:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BiGBMAW
You Know... I heard John "Hanoi" Kerry was at Sea too....

I'm sure just because someone served in the military, they are truly experts in all things warfare


Never stopped anyone who favored an extreme right political platform from thinking so. The few, the proud who may have served, that is. ;)

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #26 on: January 17, 2008, 11:10:13 PM »
See Rules #4, #5
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:36:41 PM by Skuzzy »
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #27 on: January 17, 2008, 11:20:35 PM »
Yet Dago seems to be an expert on news articles due to his well readedness... :aok

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #28 on: January 17, 2008, 11:23:40 PM »
Oh stop..please!! Seriously, you're gonna make me have a stroke! My sides are hurting from laughing so ****ing hard at you idiots telling Sandy he don't know jack about the Navy, security procedure and defensive protocol! :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5707
Iranian Naval 'Incident' - fabricated for GWB
« Reply #29 on: January 17, 2008, 11:50:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lutrel
See Rule #5


Actually it's 72 virgins...and along with them comes 72 irate mother-inlaws.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2008, 03:37:16 PM by Skuzzy »
**JOKER'S JOKERS**