Author Topic: He-111 (Read 1321 times)

evenhaim · « **on:** February 15, 2008, 01:01:30 AM »

please its been requested so many times and i truely felt its presence missing yesterday in the snapshot

lyric1 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 15, 2008, 07:08:31 AM »

Ditto. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histories/He111/He111_011.jpg&imgrefurl=http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histories/He111/He-111.htm&h=453&w=709&sz=28&hl=en&start=13&um=1&tbnid=IP5y-rCtkShygM:&tbnh=89&tbnw=140&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhe111%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4ADBR_enUS236US236%26sa%3DN http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.battle-of-britain.com/BoB2/aircraft/German/HE111b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.battle-of-britain.com/BoB2/aircraft/German/HE111.htm&h=375&w=500&sz=24&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=WB5KFTGvNkIU5M:&tbnh=98&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhe111%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4ADBR_enUS236US236%26sa%3DN http://www.btinternet.com/~lee_mail/He111-7.jpg

Denholm · « **Reply #2 on:** February 15, 2008, 08:56:48 AM »

Must... Have... HE... 111!:O

Gowan · « **Reply #3 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:17:37 AM »

me want it now!!!!

waystin2 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 15, 2008, 09:59:12 AM »

Yes!:aok

derkojote23 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 15, 2008, 03:27:16 PM »

My opinion is well documented, I ditto the motion

Larry · « **Reply #6 on:** February 15, 2008, 03:28:22 PM »

It will never be in the game because it doesnt have a P in its name.

Krusty · « **Reply #7 on:** February 15, 2008, 03:33:05 PM »

How about the He-111P?

(Export version of He-111H series)

Larry · « **Reply #8 on:** February 15, 2008, 03:38:10 PM »

Was it built in the USA? If not then NO!

Krusty · « **Reply #9 on:** February 15, 2008, 04:49:50 PM »

But U, S, and A could be various tail codes on the fuselage...

Karnak · « **Reply #10 on:** February 15, 2008, 05:04:51 PM »

He111 would be kinda, sorta useful for scenarios. A bit.

I'd rather see the Ju188A-2. A good, mid-late war bomber with the firepower and speed to be useful later than 1940.

He111 = hangar queen in the mid and late war and duplicated coverage in early war and scenarios. I do not understand the lust for this bomber.

MjTalon · « **Reply #11 on:** February 15, 2008, 05:06:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak
He111 would be kinda, sorta useful for scenarios. A bit.

I'd rather see the Ju188A-2. A good, mid-late war bomber with the firepower and speed to be useful later than 1940.

He111 = hangar queen in the mid and late war and duplicated coverage in early war and scenarios. I do not understand the lust for this bomber.

Think because it looks kool.

soda72 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 15, 2008, 05:19:17 PM »

I don't see how CT can be completed without the he-111....

Larry · « **Reply #13 on:** February 15, 2008, 05:26:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak
He111 would be kinda, sorta useful for scenarios. A bit.

I'd rather see the Ju188A-2. A good, mid-late war bomber with the firepower and speed to be useful later than 1940.

He111 = hangar queen in the mid and late war and duplicated coverage in early war and scenarios. I do not understand the lust for this bomber.

Like karnak said just get rid of all the pre '45 planes they are taking up space that could be used for better faster more uber planes. I mean who needs a full early or mid war setup for AvA/SEA/EWMA/MWMA/CT.

Karnak · « **Reply #14 on:** February 15, 2008, 05:30:46 PM »

Larry,

Kindly do not put words in my mouth.

Ok?

Can you manage that simple task?

Deal?

I said nor claimed no such thing. In fact, I often push for early war stuff. The fact is, the He111 does not plug a hole.

Want and early war bomber that does? Ask for a G4M2 or Wellington Mk III, both of which I push for.