Author Topic: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape  (Read 3693 times)

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13891
F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« on: March 11, 2008, 03:51:51 PM »
This guy did everything he could to keep the bird intact and bring it back. I'm wondering if he didn't lose hydraulic pressure as the bird just wouldn't slow down on the runway. This is a great clip.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8df_1205185501
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2008, 04:49:06 PM »
HE did it right. At those speeds his brakes probably glassed over and faded.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Sundowner

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2008, 09:19:36 PM »
Why was he so fast at touchdown?

HUD shows 250+ at touchdown. Wouldn't that almost insure an EOR overrun?

Thanks for the clip.

Regards,
Sun
Freedom implies risk. Less freedom implies more risk.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2008, 09:36:38 PM »
If anyone can find a link to the publicly released accident report, I might be able to discuss this one.  If not... well, the tape sort of speaks for itself.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline BansheCH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
      • CM SnapShot Team
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2008, 10:02:36 PM »
Wow that was amazing. I could not find the actual report but i did find this. It happened 9th November 1995. I also found this site. http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/Aircraft_by_Type/f-15.htm
-BansheCH
~364TH FG CHAWKS~
AcesHigh Special Events

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2008, 10:18:25 PM »
Here's a forum post by someone claiming to have been shown this accident during USAF pilot training. Quote: "They show us this video to show how not to do things."

  http://tinyurl.com/32jsjg

His summary of the events on the tape:

Emergency: Engine fire.

Flight Lead thought he had an engine fire, had his wingman check it out: Correct, that's one of the major reason fighters fly with wingmen, just for such a situation as this.

@ 0:48 Flight Lead declares an emergency and states intentions: Correct

@ 1:23, wingman reports confirmed fire in right engine-says to shut it down: Sorta correct. Good on wingman, was exactly what he should have done. Bad on lead if he hadn't shut down the engine yet.

@ 1:41, Wingman says fire is still burning: Good on wingmen, he needs to let lead know what's going on

@ 1:56, Wingman asks to confirm engine is off: Debatable. He takes 15 seconds to ask, but on the other hand, he probably doesn't want to clutter up the radio if flight lead has his hands full.

@ 1:58, Flight lead confirms he has engine off: Either he had it off for a while, or he just turned it off. If it was off for a while, he was wrong. He should have got an update from the wingman much sooner. If he just turned it off, he was wrong because he took WAY too long to perform that critical action.

@ 2:00, Wingman RE-confirms there is a fire in the right engine.

Stop. There is one action now. Only one. EJECT. That's it. Period. Dot. The end. No debate. This isn't WWII. People don't deadstick flaming aircraft anymore. Every engine fire checklist in every ejection seat aircraft in the USAF ends with: If a fire is confirmed eject. He needed to state his intentions to his wingman, get his stuff together, get in a good ejection envelope, and punch. There's no other answer. None. Yeah, if you're over a city or something, it may be a good idea to quickly point the aircraft in a more open spot if the pilot still has control, but where that flight was taking place there is farm land and that's about it.

@ 2:10, Flight Lead states he will fly back to land: Wrong. Dead wrong.

@ 2:15, Wingman says "copy": Dead wrong. As a wingman, he shouldn't tell lead what to do, but reminding lead what the checklist actually says to do might be a good place to start. Actually, that's what he's supposed to do.

@ 3:07, Wingman says "Misty 1, it's your call, but this thing is burning." : Wrong. He was trying to not step on leads toes, but at this point, its clear #2 knows what's going on and knows the correct steps. Eject. He's no longer helping lead like he needs to. Lead gives no response.

@ 3:34, Lead asks to confirm right engine on fire, gets conformation of fire still burning: See above.

@ 3:43, #2 tries to throw lead a hint of fire stagnation once he slows down. Its his way of saying "follow the squealing checklist" but lead isnt getting or chooses to ignore the hints.

@ 4:00, Lead, "This is going to be a bad one.": That should be a clue that the steps being taken are wrong ones.

@ 4:10, Lead asks #2 to go over the stagnation again, #2 again tries to throw a hint. Wastes 19 seconds talking. #2 is making things worse now.

@ 5:02, once lined up with the runway, lead is flying 350 knots on a straight in. That's crazy. He's about 180 knots too fast. Aircraft want to fly and even being 10-20 knots fast drastically lengthens landing distance (up to 50% in some cases). Think what 180 knots will do.

@ 5:25, he is having extreme difficulty controlling the jet at 300 knots with the gear down. Fighter type aircraft are much more sensitive than most people would assume and at that speed and configuration, his aircraft is extremely sensitive. He's getting into pilot-induced-oscillations as he's tiring to get it down. That's an extremely bad place to be when landing. Hundreds of people have died because of that though the years.

@ 5:33, he finally smacks it down at 260 knots. Tires aren't even rated to go that fast on most aircraft (not sure about the F-15 though). He's going way to fast to aero brake. If he pulls the nose up like he's supposed to, the aircraft will start flying again.

@ 5:51, wingman tells lead to "get it stopped." Waste of airtime again. Entirely unhelpful.

@ 5:52, Lead says he can't stop and he'll need to punch: Un-needed, un-helpful communication, wastes his brainbites.

@ 6:07, Only kills about 80 knots, STILL hasn't ejected. Wingman FINALLY says to "get out." That's something he should have said at 1:41 or earlier.

That the aircraft ended upright is a surprise. Most aircraft in that situation flip over which usually results in the death of the crew.

“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13891
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2008, 10:19:27 PM »
Culero you on ADV?
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2008, 10:24:41 PM »
Culero you on ADV?

Nah, I'm on Google :)

(and what's ADV?)
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Shaky

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 550
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2008, 10:52:03 PM »
Ya Culero, I watched the whole damned thing and NO-ONE said the "E" word! Hope they grounded that pilot for a bit and pounded the "get-home-itis" outta his skull.
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2008, 05:19:38 AM »
Ya Culero, I watched the whole damned thing and NO-ONE said the "E" word! Hope they grounded that pilot for a bit and pounded the "get-home-itis" outta his skull.

Whaddaya mean no one said the "E" word? The pilot declared "E"mergency clearly. You mean "E"ject?

What I'd like to know is whether or not the forum post I quoted has accurate information. Should the pilot have ejected immediately once it was clear he had an engine fire?
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2008, 05:50:13 AM »
What I'd like to know is whether or not the forum post I quoted has accurate information. Should the pilot have ejected immediately once it was clear he had an engine fire?

If the fire can't be put out the pilot has to eject. It's stupid to try land a burning plane if you have an option, because once it's on the ground it will be destroyed by fire anyway. Assuming it doesn't blow up before that.

Offline wrongwayric

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2008, 08:46:41 AM »
I'm thinking it was a judgement call on the pilots part, though a bad one. Having been an ejection seat mechanic for 13yrs in the marines and talking to pilots that had and had not ejected they all pretty much agreed. The ones that hadn't didn't really ever want to and the ones that had didn't want to do it again unless absolutely neccessary. Personally listening to that i think i would have picked a spot to point the plane and gotten out before i attempted to land it. Ejection at ground level is one of the worst options as that's the poorest area of performance for an ejection seat. Sure it will get you out, under a chute, and you'll have about 3 swings under a full canopy before you hit the ground, but who's to say the wind may not blow you back into your burning aircraft? I know our pilot emergency procedures told them to put themselves in the optimal ejection envelope possible for the situation, which ground level in a burning, rolling aircraft surely is not one of them.
AKsleepy

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2008, 10:15:13 AM »
I bet everyone hates the idea of being thrown out of a plane when you still have control of it. Fire or no fire. :cry
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2008, 10:59:50 AM »
The ones that hadn't didn't really ever want to and the ones that had didn't want to do it again unless absolutely neccessary.

Doesn't pilots get grounded if they're ejected like 2 or 3 times? Something about the force of ejection compressing the spinal joints.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Re: F15 inflight fire and emergency landing from HUD tape
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2008, 11:30:15 AM »
Doesn't pilots get grounded if they're ejected like 2 or 3 times? Something about the force of ejection compressing the spinal joints.


I don't think there's a set limit but I do know that the old Martin Baker seats in F4s were a killer on the backs of pilots.  They would come out sometimes up to an inch shorter than they were.  Your body could not handle more than 2 of those.

The newer MBs and ACES II/III seats aren't as bad as the old ones.  There's alot less umph in the first stage in the two stage catapult (somthing like 43ft p/sec). 

What I'm wondering is that jet is equiped with an arrestor hook....does whiteman not have an overunn cable system?