Author Topic: battle ships  (Read 4099 times)

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: battle ships
« Reply #45 on: March 18, 2008, 01:12:45 PM »
All you guys do realise that the USS Arizona exploded at Pearl Harbor, right?

ahh...yeah...that's why I posted that

<S>
Yossarian
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline John Hynds

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: battle ships
« Reply #46 on: March 18, 2008, 03:30:21 PM »
Posted in another thread about a new task group. A bombardment group with no capabilities to launch aircraft or lvt. Just flatten coastal and near coastal bases/towns.[img]

Offline John Hynds

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: battle ships
« Reply #47 on: March 18, 2008, 03:33:36 PM »
Iowa class would be kinda overkill. No planes or pt boats should be able to get close to an Iowa class BB because of it's armament. The North Carolina class were built in the Late 30's and would be quite adequate.

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: battle ships
« Reply #48 on: March 18, 2008, 03:51:43 PM »
Well, they have 'em in other sims, like IL-2 and Targetware; Only as targets, though. Not something you can use yourself. (Although I saw in Target:Tobruk that there is a work in progress, on being able to use the Vittorio Venetto.)

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #49 on: March 18, 2008, 04:16:26 PM »
Iowa class would be kinda overkill. No planes or pt boats should be able to get close to an Iowa class BB because of it's armament. The North Carolina class were built in the Late 30's and would be quite adequate.

Um the armament of BB.55 was almost the same as the Iowa, minor differences.

Hull Number:  BB 55
Keel Laid: October 27, 1937
Launched:  June 13, 1940
Commissioned: April 9, 1941
Decommissioned:  June 27, 1947
Length: 728 feet 5/8 inches long
Extreme Beam: 108 feet 3 7/8 inches wide
Mean Draught:  31 feet 7 inches normal, 35 feet 6 inches maximum
Displacement: 36,600 tons standard, 44,800 tons full load
Complement:  2,339 (144 officers and 2,195 enlisted)
Speed:   28 knots
Armament:  9 16-inch/45 caliber guns
20 5-inch/38 caliber guns
60 40mm/56 caliber guns
48 20mm/70 caliber guns

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: battle ships
« Reply #50 on: March 18, 2008, 04:25:39 PM »
I think it would be nice to see.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #51 on: March 19, 2008, 03:59:53 AM »
Sure would, a nice KM surface fleet with KMS Bismarck BB KMS Prinz Eugen CA and a host of Z.99 DDs (if you want to get hypothetical throw in a functional KMS Graf Zeplin CV complete with Bf.109Ts)....
Ok I know Im just kidding with the KMS Graf Zeplin, as it was floated but never finnished out and the Bf.109t cancelled shortly there after.  But the surface fleet the the KM admralty dreampt of but would never have would be a sweet sweet thing.  :aok

Offline Hitman20

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 110
Re: battle ships
« Reply #52 on: March 19, 2008, 11:21:22 AM »
I think we should take the task force we have now, and just replace the CA with a BB. :aok

Offline DaftDog

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
Re: battle ships
« Reply #53 on: March 21, 2008, 07:22:18 AM »
Yeah! I think so, but maybe only up to Pennsylvania class, cuz Iowa class ( Missouri)
would be REAL tough to fight.

Check on Wiki for the Info in battleship classes above, for all concerned.

But still, I say we do it! :rock


Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Re: battle ships
« Reply #54 on: March 23, 2008, 01:44:50 AM »
No wa dood.  Teh texas would PWN joooo!1!!!!!!


pffft, noobz.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline chrish483

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
Re: battle ships
« Reply #55 on: March 23, 2008, 02:11:16 AM »
I try very hard NOT to be a newbie or a dw33b, but:

USS IOWA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :devil

(with her 1945 armament, of course)

<S>

Yossarian

hay are you from IOWA?  i live 35 mils SE of DesMoines.  hell ya  the USS IOWA :aok
L.T.A.R.smkr
SWsmkr

Offline chrish483

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
Re: battle ships
« Reply #56 on: March 23, 2008, 02:23:09 AM »
You see, this is why we can't have civilized discussions on these forums anymore...  :rolleyes:

I'll agree with that, most havent looked but we do have a battleship in the CV's or most of them that is,  tho it only has 8inch guns but still a battleship.
L.T.A.R.smkr
SWsmkr

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #57 on: March 23, 2008, 04:14:39 AM »
No wa dood.  Teh texas would PWN joooo!1!!!!!!


pffft, noobz.

USS Texas BB.35 was a veteran of both WWI and WWII.  However to say that it would own is a little much.  She is after all a reagular dreadnought laid down in 1911 and completed in 1914, not forgetting her many modernizations she is still an aged desighn compared to the later super dreadnoughts of 60,000 - 70,000 tons.

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #58 on: March 23, 2008, 06:09:17 PM »
zOMG thn u neeed to see my post on teh yahmatoe!1!11!!!11

To paraphrase Jenna Jemison on her favorite co-star, "Eighteen inches of goodness, baby!"

zOMFGZ!!!1!1ElevtieUNO~! Pr0n?!?!?  :rofl

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Re: battle ships
« Reply #59 on: March 24, 2008, 04:20:00 AM »
No way mang, the texas was teh uber!  I mean it had to be it was named TEH TEXAS!1!1!!!eleventyoneunoeinetc...!11!1!
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo