Perk the 163 higher

[SD67]

yeah but we cannot pork the fuel like we used to these days

[moot]

I mean in WWII.  A few high fighters above the HQ bombers, and some NOE La7s or other (short legs on the La7) low alt harrasment fighters would probably be enough to mitigate 163 defence.. I think the critical part is not letting them be seen until the 163s spawn on the runway, otherwise you get the anti-capture knee jerk reaction of mass uppers which would allow the 163s to slip thru. 
P47Ns spraying lots of 50cal at 163s will almost guarantee a pretty big delay in 163s hitting the bombers.   It's not such a stretch to entice fighter jocks along for a longish ride at 30k so they could have a go at rocket dweebs.

[Strip]

Your correct Moot.

C-Stoff and T-Stoff as labeled by the Germans was in short supply. Both had severe transportation limitations and were hypergolic (no spark needed) with each other. A cotton rag will burst into flames shortly after contact. I believe the chemical names are hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide (or nitric acid) going from memory.

You could go NOE and just orbit the base in P-51s. Not much is going to get up to you if your smart in the 5 or 10 minutes before the bombs fall. Most wont spawn if the threat of getting vulched is real. If they spend time turning with you they wont have the fuel to get up to the buffs anyway. Heck a few 35k 51s even scare all but the most aggressive 262 pilots away.

Tactics......people fail to use them and then wonder why they failed.

Strip(er)

[Larry]

C-Stoff was a mixture of 57% methyl alcohol, 30% hydrazine hydrate and 13% water. T-Stoff was 80% concentrated hydrogen peroxide, to which some additional stabilizers were added.

[Barnes828]

No point they are easy to kill...

my squad and I did an HQ raid and shot 9 of them down all together.

[Bronk]

Lets see now.
1. only at 1 base
2. 6 min of fuel
3. 120 rounds
4. already perked

Nahh it's limited enough.

[Spikes]

NO.
Like said before, get 6 '47Ns to cherry pick the 163s as they come up...

[Rich46yo]

                    Well thanks for the opinions, whatever they were. At least to the ones who made contributions to the thread. <S>

[DPQ5]

Lets see now.
1. only at 1 base
2. 6 min of fuel
3. 120 rounds
4. already perked

Nahh it's limited enough.

i completely agree, i mean a 163 can only stay up a little and u have 2 climb 2 bombers so buy the time your get up there you only have about a minute of fuel wich when i take a 163 thats only time for me 2 get 2 bombers and pray 2 get home

[angelsandair]

Um, most people do care. When you type like that you make yourself out to be a kid.

actually most people dont. I could care less, as long as it isnt like this: "HelLo EvERy OnE i wAnT tO pERk tHEE OnE SIx ThREe HIghEr!!"

[Larry]

I could care less

Wells thats no surprise.

And yes people do care when you type like you havent graduated first grade.

[WWhiskey]

Hmm, pulling the "realism" card while asking that a specific type of plane be further limited, to facilitate the bombing of a single structure which defeats radar for an entire country, over the entire map.

Does this strike anyone else as a bit ironic?

yes it does!

[BaDkaRmA158Th]

Yup, if i am defending some of the last areas on my map, and you are conducting a raid.
If i take the time and effort "and perks" to fly out to you, i will ram you if i feal like it.(after ammo out of course)


Desperation, the end of days for a loosing side.


The way of things. 

[DPQ5]

i would use a 109 to ram enemy bombers conductiong a ram

[SD67]

why does that not surprise me?