Sorry moot, I rarely maintain/destroy home appliances with completely inappropriate utensils while inebriated. That's a lesson I learned in my teens when I started using hand tools for their intended purpose. I'll have to respectfully concede that one.
I'm familiar enough with the science to be intrigued but I don't personally feel confirming the theoretical existence of the effects of theoretical subatomic elements is worth the investment. I've always felt that the most useful science is spawned from the private sector. I'm not against mankind seeking all there is to know but it's gone way beyond the $64,000 question. As I understand there are more breakthroughs than the data issue with regards to construction, EMR isolation and insulation, geology, etc. Innovation happens. I just happen to believe these colliders are a ham fisted methodology that can only necessitate an even greater commitment in order to start to apply any discoveries that are made. These guys only think they know what they are looking for evidence of, much less do they have any idea which direction any application of this data will take.
And don't pick on Maria, even she knows that hammers and chisels belong in the hands of a professional, sounds like she could teach you a thing or two.