Author Topic: Can we just rename it?  (Read 3361 times)

Offline BiPoLaR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #90 on: May 26, 2008, 02:06:06 PM »
It used to be that if a guy came upon a fight, he'd circle just outside of it and wait his turn. Guarding the fight, no matter the outcome of his countrymate below.  Whether it was in the middle of the pond, or right off of his field. Even AFK guys would get a break. Saddle up on their six and wait until he comes back to shoot him as he panics and rolls around.  :lol
I still do that
ill stay out till the guy says come on, on 200
i try to show respect for 1 v1s
R.I.P. T.E.Moore (Dad) 9-9-45 - 7-16-10.
R.I.P. Wes Poss  (Best Friend) 11-14-75 - 5-2-14

Offline LCCajun

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #91 on: May 26, 2008, 02:53:33 PM »
I got a good solution to the ppl getting ganged GET A WINGMAN!!!!! it works great. Yes you will still get ganged but you would be surprised what you could do with a wingman.
Ingame ID: Cajon

"SlapShot
There is no shame in putting up a good fight and dieing."
"You never know how strong you are til being strong is the only choice you have" Unknown author

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #92 on: May 26, 2008, 04:10:24 PM »
I got a good solution to the ppl getting ganged GET A WINGMAN!!!!! it works great. Yes you will still get ganged but you would be surprised what you could do with a wingman.

No way.  Having a wingman is unmanly because then you can't fight 1vs1. :noid
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline BlauK

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5091
      • http://www.virtualpilots.fi/LLv34/
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #93 on: May 26, 2008, 04:11:04 PM »
If 1 on 1 is all there is to a dogfight, why even bother making it a MMOG  :rofl

Just accept the fact that different people find the fun and excitement in different aspects of the game. Try to have fun on your own terms without trying to force others to change their style. It is pretty obvious you find BnZ lame if you choose to fly EW planes. They usually out turn late war rides. It is only natural to fly each plane according to their streghts. Would you really try to  turnfight a Zeke in a Typhoon yourself????  :rolleyes:


  BlauKreuz - Lentolaivue 34      


Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #94 on: May 26, 2008, 04:44:57 PM »
You keep putting it like "1:1" means "one player vs one player", as opposed to more or less even odds, whatever the numbers.
Would you really try to  turnfight a Zeke in a Typhoon yourself????  :rolleyes:
More often than you think, and it's not just me.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8804
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #95 on: May 26, 2008, 05:15:38 PM »
I got a good solution to the ppl getting ganged GET A WINGMAN!!!!! it works great. Yes you will still get ganged but you would be surprised what you could do with a wingman.

Wingmen can be an asset or detrimental depending upon whether they have any skill. I flew with a squad that had some good sticks, some average sticks and some who were and will forever be, helpless. I spent far too much time clearing sixes of the clueless, till I decided not to bother anymore. We had one guy with a 0.07/1 K/D over several tours. Nice guy, but didn't grasp the basic concepts needed to be even slightly successful. He would dive into every horde and be dead in 30 seconds. He was the only player I ever saw who would dive in to strafe a hanger and miss. If I had to pick a winner in a duel between him and Stevie Wonder, I'd put my money on Stevie.

By the way, a wingman is no guarantee that you not will be ganged by a mob. Circumstances must be understood as well.

All of that said, I generally fly alone. I'm usually outnumbered and sometimes get ganged. That's the price I pay when I head to the nearest base being assailed by a horde (aircraft, GVs or both).

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Wraith

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #96 on: May 26, 2008, 06:21:18 PM »
Why's everyone so desperate for one on ones?

They're often the only fair fights you can get.  It directly shows your skill as a pilot, and your enemy's skill with no other variables besides the conditions you're flying in. 
-\/\/R/-\IT|-|

"The only two things that fall from the sky is manna from heaven, and your plane."

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #97 on: May 26, 2008, 06:43:11 PM »
You left out whiners.
And squeakers.
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #98 on: May 26, 2008, 07:13:50 PM »
If 1 on 1 is all there is to a dogfight, why even bother making it a MMOG  :rofl

Just accept the fact that different people find the fun and excitement in different aspects of the game. Try to have fun on your own terms without trying to force others to change their style. It is pretty obvious you find BnZ lame if you choose to fly EW planes. They usually out turn late war rides. It is only natural to fly each plane according to their streghts. Would you really try to  turnfight a Zeke in a Typhoon yourself????  :rolleyes:


So it's not ok for people who want to actually dog fight to force their rules on to you.. Yet it's ok for the gangtards and hoard monkeys to force their way into my fight?   That's pretty much what you are saying. Why is it ok for one group but not the other?

Why is it my fun is always ruined by the gangtards that want to have their fun? I mean really back to the entire point of this topic. Why is it, if there is already 2 or 3 countrymen fighting a lone con, that 2 or 3 more always feel the need to jump in and be even bigger retards?
« Last Edit: May 26, 2008, 07:17:01 PM by crockett »
"strafing"

Offline jaxxo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #99 on: May 27, 2008, 03:05:32 AM »
up plane
engage 7k con
chase7kcon after blown merge
dodge 5 ho attempts
reverse on 5 gangerz
get shot in donut by original con
shoot down 3 tards while your engine is smoking
get called spitard cuz you dared to fly a spit against 6 planes solo

thats pretty much every sorty, just try to realize its gonna happen and say oh well and have some fun with it

hate to say it but most players have huge egos and do not like to get shot, myself included, i may whine about it but at least I try and fly like i got a pair...that is all


Offline Yenny

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #100 on: May 27, 2008, 03:20:29 AM »
quit crying Jaxxo! u have yet flyin through a fighter hanger !
E .· ` ' / ·. F
Your tears fuel me.
Noobing since tour 96
Ze LuftVhiners Alliance - 'Don't Focke Wulf Us!'

Offline BlauK

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5091
      • http://www.virtualpilots.fi/LLv34/
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #101 on: May 27, 2008, 04:11:10 AM »

So it's not ok for people who want to actually dog fight to force their rules on to you.. Yet it's ok for the gangtards and hoard monkeys to force their way into my fight?   That's pretty much what you are saying. Why is it ok for one group but not the other?

Why is it my fun is always ruined by the gangtards that want to have their fun? I mean really back to the entire point of this topic. Why is it, if there is already 2 or 3 countrymen fighting a lone con, that 2 or 3 more always feel the need to jump in and be even bigger retards?

You could just as well try claiming that your fun is being able to fly C-47 to enemy HQ and back. No-one should engage you because that would be ruining your fun, right? There are limits what you can dream of and where.

However, you could do the C-47 flight offline. Just the same you CAN have your 1-on-1:s at DA. You just make it happen!

If you go to MA, there are limits to what you can do. There you have to adjust or create the opportunities for your own fun, but never expect others to do what you would do yourself.


  BlauKreuz - Lentolaivue 34      


Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #102 on: May 27, 2008, 06:11:45 AM »
You could just as well try claiming that your fun is being able to fly C-47 to enemy HQ and back. No-one should engage you because that would be ruining your fun, right? There are limits what you can dream of and where.

However, you could do the C-47 flight offline. Just the same you CAN have your 1-on-1:s at DA. You just make it happen!

If you go to MA, there are limits to what you can do. There you have to adjust or create the opportunities for your own fun, but never expect others to do what you would do yourself.

Yes I know that I was being a smart ass. It just wasn't always this bad, it seems to keep getting worse and worse as time goes on. Why should we have to keep adjusting to worse and worse game play, rather than try to do something about it?

It just takes some of the bigger squads to start being vocal to their own squaddies about leaving fights alone or at the very least making sure to ask the green guy if he wants help before diving in trying to steal the kill he's worked for.

I don't think anyone expects a 1 on 1 in the middle of a furball but then again do we really need 4 or 5 guys chasing one con? It's pretty freaking retarded and shows the skill-set of the average AHer these days. I will say sometimes it can be fun and it's quite challenging to fight out numbered but what goes on in the MA pretty much limits the fights and doesn't really teach new players how to fight for themselves.

In the MA these days it's degraded to hoard vs hoard with not much of anything else.
"strafing"

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9515
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #103 on: May 27, 2008, 07:57:09 AM »
We had one guy with a 0.07/1 K/D over several tours. Nice guy, but didn't grasp the basic concepts needed to be even slightly successful. He would dive into every horde and be dead in 30 seconds. He was the only player I ever saw who would dive in to strafe a hanger and miss. If I had to pick a winner in a duel between him and Stevie Wonder, I'd put my money on Stevie.

Hey!  I was never in your squad!

- oldman

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Can we just rename it?
« Reply #104 on: May 27, 2008, 11:46:33 AM »
The server "sees" nothing.  All that matters is what you see on your front end...period.

I agree.  His terminology or understanding was wrong.  Since you know so match though, please explain to me how I can empty my ammo load on someone from D200 and not even get him to smoke, period?
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.