BOA AvA Player Conduct expectations

[Shifty]

i think the rules are great!! i think it will work out nicely. what id really like to know, is why, when i suggested rules of that nature, i was considered somewhat of a radical. i faced a barage of critisizm and now look, we have rules. imagine that. well i for one am all for them. just wish i hadnt been left to hang out to dry.

Behind every silver lining there's a grey cloud.

[flatiron1]

just to clarify, whining about hoing, vulching and ack running is frowned on, right. LOL

[captain1ma]

thanks shifty, i knew i could count on you!! heheh 

[VWE]

See Rules #4, #5, #2

[Slash27]

support@hitechcreations.com

[Stampf]

Looks good here.

[Jester]

i think the rules are great!! i think it will work out nicely. what id really like to know, is why, when i suggested rules of that nature, i was considered somewhat of a radical. i faced a barage of critisizm and now look, we have rules. imagine that. well i for one am all for them. just wish i hadnt been left to hang out to dry.

Are you dry and smell spring fresh after hanging out?   

[captain1ma]

why yes jester i am, spring fresh and minty fresh!! thanks for asking! now let the games begin!

[Skuzzy]

See Rules #4, #5, #2

Let's clear up something right now.  There is no conspiracy against any squad in this forum.  I have no idea who belongs to what and I could care less.  If you post against the forums rules then it gets handled.

If it happens to be a high percentage of a squad, then it is purely coincidental.

I will also reiterate, abusing volunteers who give thier time to try and help provide players with different options to play the game will not be tolerated.

[VonMessa]

IN 

[Halo46]

Out!

[Chemdawg]

I know the horse may be getting beat a little too much buuuutttt.......... I come on the arena every once in awhile, usually midday CST. Alot of the time there will be myself and maybe one other. If what I am understanding you to say is that a one person bombing raid would not be against the rules..it must be roughly 3 persons or more on one side that will constitute a rule violation?

I need to clarify cause I dont feel like gettin' put on tater peelin' duty by my CO instead of flyin'.

Thanks in advance.

[captain1ma]

Good question Damionte.  Rule 5 is meant to stop 5-10 players coordinating and sticking to one side to pummel their vacant opponent in an organized fashion - what we consider unreasonable player conduct. 2-3 players,  is reasonable.  Conversely, side CO are expected to defend their territories - war doesn't sleep and if they have players from a variety of time zones, the could coordinate their times in the arena.  It all goes down to what is reasonable. 

If a side logs as you're in the middle of a coordinated attack, the attack continues.  It again goes back to what is reasonable.  Sized are expected to defend their resources. 

Hope this answers your question.
 

so we can pork with 2-3 players, but not 5-10 is that correct. this is assuming no defenders. just asking for a clarification, not trying to start trouble.

[dedalos]

OK, this is just funny.  These people are asking when is it OK to pork the fields and when it is not?  Is that where the AvA got?  Here is a thought, if you have no opposition, don't ask if it is OK to pork a field.  No rule is needed.  Just don't do it!  Is that really too hard of a concept?  What other games do you guys like to play and win by your selfs? 

<S> on the rules and the eject ability.  About time

[Easyscor]

You can't expect two or three guys to sit in the tower until opposition shows up, so you can't prohibit them from finding something to do. The setup should prevent too much damage so long as no more than the allowed number are active. Push the limits and I'd expect consequences.