I have no problem with constructive criticism, infact I welcome it but when someone shows a rather discrepant criticism, I ask myself why bother?
Edit: im not gona bother discussing this anymore, I'm sorry I wasted my time on what I thought was a good project to build on.
But thats how the aces high community is
First off, Adonai, this was a good idea, but subsequently you have made it so difficult on yourself...
Alright, based on what I have seen here, yes you do have a problem with constructive criticism. Lusche has told you over and over again that this is a great idea, and has encouraged you, yes, to even carry on with the idea. The problem he has with it, happens to be the same problem I have with it....
I don't know why you did this. Maybe you're trying to better the community, or maybe your just trying to get props for attempting something good, or whatever. It doesn't matter what I think. What does matter is the fact that you basically put minimal effort into the project, and went off "the top of your head." What's wrong with that is that newer players (like Lusche said) come in here looking to find the best uber plane (even though there isn't one...) and end up seeing something like this and believing that all of it is true, even when there are obvious errors and inconsistent data (especially considering that it was compiled not by using solid data, but your memory...).
It's a good idea, it really is, but like Lusche said, there needs to be some consistent way to rank the planes, not just by "oh I'm pretty sure the 110C is pretty fast so I'll label it as...." and this plane, "eh well if I remember right, it wasn't so good, so I'll put it as...".
Understand?
donkey