Author Topic: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices  (Read 1533 times)

Offline BTW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1107
Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« on: June 09, 2008, 09:41:48 PM »
If oil companies pass along their refining expenses, their employee expenses, their oil expenses, and even their tax expenses to the consumer, why wouldn't they pass on Obama's windfall profit tax? Would they say "oh, this meant to help the consumer so we will eat the expense"?
Why wouldn't gas go from $4 a gallon to $4 + windfall profit tax a gallon?

This is the idiocy you get when Obama actually says something other than platitudes.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00963020080609

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2008, 09:42:52 PM »
Ah yes, the liberal solution to EVERYTHING, tax the profits.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2008, 10:04:38 PM »
There is a limit to everything, even the air. If you continue to tax and reduce it the ability to make advances or increases in anything will diminish. Taking from some to spread to the masses didn't work for the Russians or the Chinese, it won't work here. Dem's have seen the funding for the govt. increase when taxes were drawn down yet the only solution is more taxes as far as they are concerned.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2008, 10:21:22 PM »
This is what you get when 80% of our elected officials are LAWYERS, and their only time ever spent in the private sector was in a law firm, playing a legal version of Robin Hood. They really haven't an effing clue about economics, and I think libs, beyond that, refuse to acknowledge the existence of the  law of supply and demand
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2008, 10:33:11 PM »
How stupid can one get... the cost of all taxes are always passed down to the end-user
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2008, 10:37:31 PM »
Or ya get this....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,364743,00.html

Now THIS is the very type of thing we should all be thankful for .......don't ya think?

I mean come on...losing 4 million so people don't lose thier jobs...payrolls of 250,000.00 for a month....for "Sub-Par" service even? We should all be mad that we don't lose another few million of our dollars so that they can keep it run by themselves.

what a frikin crock.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline BTW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2008, 10:39:06 PM »
How stupid can one get... the cost of all taxes are always passed down to the end-user

Thats about it. I just wonder who feeds on that rhetoric. In highly competitive industries, taxes can cut into profits which succeeds in depressing the industry. But the US oil industry is NOT highly competitive. Any tax will be passed fully to the  consumer. Obama speaks idiocy.

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2008, 10:50:51 PM »
Right idea. Wrong target.

The oil companies arent the problem.
Its the commodities speculators artificially manipulating the prices that need to be reigned in.

Im all for free trade. But I recognise that in some cases. Some degree of regulations are needed on vital items.
You cant just let people run amuk and do what basically amounts to extorting money out of people because they can on something they HAVE to have.
Gas and heating oil isnt like Ice cream. where if you dont like the price for Bryars this week Edys may be cheaper.
And if it isnt. You just dont buy it because really its not something you absolutely have to have.
This is something we HAVE to have.
Not to mention a higher prie permiates itself into every aspect of our lives by not only causing us to pay more for it at the pump. but also in the goods. and some of the other vital goods we consums. thus squeezing the people from both ends.

"Of the people. By the People. and For the People"
Isnt just forbig business. the very wealthy or those who stand to gain the most from a particular item.
Its also for the general good and welfare of ALL the people. The country as a whole.
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2008, 01:08:57 AM »
Correct. Consider this. In the last 12 months, the cost of oil per barrel has more than DOUBLED. However, the demand for oil has not doubled, or increased even 10%. Nor has the amount of oil being pumped and sold DECREASED. So, while supply and demand has NOT changed radically, the price has. Two things can cause that, speculation and regulation (regulation includes taxation). Well, the speculators, being unregulated, have more than doubled the cost of oil for us. So the response by the regulators (Congress) is a proposal to increase TAXES. On the producers. Makes perfect sense.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline zuii

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2008, 02:29:53 AM »
I cant take it!
(said while running for cover)
Obama is a socialist and a closet communist!
there i said it! Blaa!
39th FS "Cobra in the Clouds"

Empress Zhang: "I love cannons"
(it was not all fun and games inside the forbidden city)

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2008, 06:15:46 AM »
Raise your hand if you actually believe that the monies gathered from a windfall profits tax on the oil companies would be paid directly back to the consumers....

Offline Bones

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 120
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2008, 06:34:48 AM »
It's all lip service.  Honestly people, have any of you actually listened to politicians and compared what they say to what they actually do?

He, and every other politician running for something, is simply going to say what they are told "we" want to hear.

It is what politicians/lawyers do.  Yet, for the life of me I cannot figure out why we keep on voting them into power.  I guess we are collectively a bunch of idiots.  Politicians treat us that way, so it must be true.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2008, 06:58:42 AM »
Quote
Correct. Consider this. In the last 12 months, the cost of oil per barrel has more than DOUBLED. However, the demand for oil has not doubled, or increased even 10%. Nor has the amount of oil being pumped and sold DECREASED.

Oil production has not increased. Demand is increasing.

There are 3 main variables in the oil market. Production, consumption, price.

You can't consume more than is produced (in the long term, anyway). If production is fixed, and consumption increasing, then the price has to rise to keep consumption down.

Consider that all the oil being produced is being used, with the price at $120+ per barrel. How much more oil would we be using if the price was $65 a barrel? Where would that extra oil be coming from if production is not increasing?

There's nothing artificial about the oil price, although speculation will always produce narrow price swings around the true, consumption/production driven price. If speculation was causing an unnaturally high price then consumption would have reduced and oil stockpiles would be increasing. They aren't, so all the oil being produced is being consumed at $120 a barrel.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2008, 07:18:35 AM »
gas sales in a US have dropped 5% in the last year.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Obama suggests windfall tax in response to gas prices
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2008, 07:35:34 AM »
In what alternate dimension, john?

This time last year I was paying just under $3.00/gal, MAYBE just over. Now I'm paying nearly $4.00, in the Midwest where prices are generally lower.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.