« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Films?  (Read 3875 times)

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Re: Films?
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2008, 12:43:24 PM »
Quote from: doleboy on July 01, 2008, 08:47:06 AM
*********STOP THE PRESS*************


...........Rule change....

No Film, No Win. Except if your Stang......


Are you kidding me?

Seems like a rule change that makes perfect sense...  Film needed to prove/disprove accusation.  No accusation, no need for film.  Forget to run film viewer at your own risk.
Logged
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Films?
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2008, 12:45:06 PM »
Quote from: Vudak on July 01, 2008, 12:43:24 PM

Are you kidding me?

Seems like a rule change that makes perfect sense...  Film needed to prove/disprove accusation.  No accusation, no need for film.  Forget to run film viewer at your own risk.


Well, in that case, I would like to report Stang as a souvlaki lover.  He likes the sauce too!
Logged
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline Platano

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1325
Re: Films?
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2008, 09:58:26 PM »
Film is Mandatory??  :huh :huh :confused: :mad:


Logged
Army of Muppets


Fly Luftwaffe.

Offline Valkyrie

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Films?
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2008, 09:57:45 AM »
Most guys who win KOTH must be good and lucky so why not make film optional unless someone reports or questions a possible rule violation. Thats how it used to be, if you can't back it up with your own film then torch the win. All the violations I remember seeing were petty deals where the guy wasn't good enough to win anyway.




<S>
Vlkyrie1
Logged

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
Re: Films?
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2008, 11:50:51 AM »
Anyone can accuse and cry foul but that doesn't automatically mean it has merit.  The Accusing Party needs to have proof, not just some opinion of what they think happened.  It is always better for the Accused to have supporting film, but it is not his/her responsibility to defend every pointless accusation that is tossed around.
Logged
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline Valkyrie

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Films?
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2008, 01:00:13 PM »
Quote from: ROC on August 06, 2008, 11:50:51 AM
Anyone can accuse and cry foul but that doesn't automatically mean it has merit.  The Accusing Party needs to have proof, not just some opinion of what they think happened.  It is always better for the Accused to have supporting film, but it is not his/her responsibility to defend every pointless accusation that is tossed around.

Here Here

Vlkyrie1
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »