Preformance based LAWS?

[wrag]

OK

THIS IS NOT ABOUT GUNS!!!

This is about the technique being purposed................

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-sugarman29-2008jun29,0,1307373.story

BIG BROTHER with bells?

Hmmm maybe this should be applied to the 2 greatest causes of death in the U.S.?

Apply this to the auto makers?

Doctors? ETC.........

AGAIN NOT talkin about GUNS here talkin about HOW things are done.................

[Mackay]

I can't even come up with the words to describe how disturbed I am with this one. What freaking fantasy land do the people that come up with this crap live in?

[Captfish]

 

[Mark Luper]

It really basically boils down to the fact that the current laws concerned with penalties for the use of a gun in commiting a crime need to be enforced. There are a ton of laws out there that already are on the books.

Human behavior would have to be changed too. Humans will always kill other humans. The weapon of choice has varied over time but the end results remains the same.

Word,

Mark

[JB88]

word.

 

[Jackal1]

and even though lawmakers have continued to pass gun-control laws to try to bring the number down, they have not significantly reduced the murder rate.

Knock Knock!
The lights are on , but nobody is home.

[wrongwayric]

SNIFF SNIFF something stinks. I really can not begin to want to kick this guy in a certain portion of his anatomy without first attaching nails to the toes of my boots. And i'm not talking about his backside that i'm wanting to kick.

Create laws, create laws, create laws, well thank god he has a job that doesn't require him to enforce the laws we already have on the books. Why he might actually have to................work?!!!!

[lazs2]

but what about the doctors who work in the fields of mental illness?

Shouldn't they be regulated based on performance?  if the gunman is found to be crazy then they are the ones who are failing?

what if he has been in the justice system in the past?  shouldn't the judges and prosecutors be liable?

lazs

[wrag]

but what about the doctors who work in the fields of mental illness?

Shouldn't they be regulated based on performance?  if the gunman is found to be crazy then they are the ones who are failing?

what if he has been in the justice system in the past?  shouldn't the judges and prosecutors be liable?

lazs

IMHO I THINK the Law Makers that DISARM the people (please read in here.. MOST law abiding people that own firearms) that don't and probably wont EVER commit a crime, SHOULD be held accountable (possibly accessory or conspiracy to commit MURDER?) WHEN those this disarm are attacked by armed criminals and murdered!

I further believe they should be REQUIRED to PERSONALLY (meaning they can't use tax payer money it must come from their PAY) help pay medical expenses for those UNARMED people harmed by criminals that are DISOBEYING (isn't that why they're called criminals?) the law.

One of the things I find irritating is some of the laws passed by our congress and senate DOESN'T always apply to them!

[Serenity]

I can't even come up with the words to describe how disturbed I am with this one. What freaking fantasy land do the people that come up with this crap live in?

Exactly. The oldest humanoid body was murdered by being bashed on the back of the head. Take away guns and well have drive-by stabbings or somethin! (The Bloods will be the biggest buyers for those ninja star thingies...  ). I really don't see how anyone could think this crap would ever work.

[lasersailor184]

IMHO I THINK the Law Makers that DISARM the people (please read in here.. MOST law abiding people that own firearms) that don't and probably wont EVER commit a crime, SHOULD be held accountable (possibly accessory or conspiracy to commit MURDER?) WHEN those this disarm are attacked by armed criminals and murdered!

I further believe they should be REQUIRED to PERSONALLY (meaning they can't use tax payer money it must come from their PAY) help pay medical expenses for those UNARMED people harmed by criminals that are DISOBEYING (isn't that why they're called criminals?) the law.

One of the things I find irritating is some of the laws passed by our congress and senate DOESN'T always apply to them!

Anyone who disarms the citizens, both publicly and privately should be held responsible, both criminally and civilly if something happens to a citizen there that a legally owned and carried Gun could have prevented.


I.E.  If your restaurant has a sign that says "No guns allowed" and then gets shot up, the owner would be responsible to pay for the healthcare of those injured (not including the gunman) and might be held accountable for preventing people from defending themselves.

[AKIron]

How about government? Can we hold it to a performance based standard? How about we set up some standards that automatically eliminate government offices when they don't meet those standards?

[lasersailor184]

I'm game.

[Saxman]

Let's just all go back to swords, where some random guy off the street can't just pick one up and use it.

[Joker]

How about government? Can we hold it to a performance based standard? How about we set up some standards that automatically eliminate government offices when they don't meet those standards?

well, of course that's the basic idea behind elections...
but nevertheless we still seem to be having some problems with the beltway boneheads 
maybe we need something more...aggressive

  Joker