Author Topic: MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V  (Read 1093 times)

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« on: March 13, 2000, 07:49:00 AM »
As far as I know, difference between Hispanos
and Mg151/20 is not as noticeable as it seems
to be in AH.
Mg151/20:
fire rate: about 750 rounds per minute.
muzzle-vel: about 800 m/s.
projectile weigh: average of 92 - 110 grams.
Gun Weigh: 41.5 kg

Hispano Mk-II:
fire rate: about 600 rounds per minute.
muzzle-vel: about 860 m/s.
projectile weigh: average of 130 grams.
Gun Weigh: 50 kg

Hispano Mk-V:
fire rate: about 750 rounds per minute.
muzzle-vel: about 840 m/s.
projectile weigh: average of 130 grams.
Gun Weigh: 42 kg

In AH, Mg151/20 seems to have noticeable
slower firing rate than any Hispano. And
Mg151/20 proyectiles seems to drop much
earlier (same convergence).

Scoring from medium/long ranges with Hispanos
is really easy and efective in AH. In the
other hand, scoring at those ranges with
Mg151/20 is a hell.

IMHO The differences between both guns should
not be so evident (talking about aiming and
hiting). Anyway, it is true that the punch of
hispanos is greater than Mg151/20.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2000, 08:29:00 AM »
Germans lost, how could they have anything even closely matched with allies? :>
..not to talk about anything being more advanced than allies had...


There must be some sort of favoring for allies...

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2000, 08:41:00 AM »
I read somewhere that the US Navy stated that the 151 was their prefered weapon. They never saw AH I guess. I am supprised too. There is no comparison between the 2 guns in the game, but your numbers would indicate quite similar weapons.  Apperently the Germans were quite satisfied by the 151, but if they had gone hunting buffs in a typhoon they would have realised the error in thier ways...I would say that the biggest advantage a plane can have in AH is the mk2 Hisp. cannon.

------------------
Pongo
The Wrecking Crew

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2000, 09:30:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo:
I read somewhere that the US Navy stated that the 151 was their prefered weapon.

I read the same refered to 151/20. And even more important, LW RL pilots were very confident with this weapon, cosidering it as a very accurate gun.

IMHO, or Mg151/20 is undermodeled, or Hispanos are overmodeled, or both. Anyway my data could be wrong. More data and more information sources would be appreciated to be able do some physics and figure out whether 190A8 pilots are flying just brick lauchers instead interceptors or not.

Flying Corsair I've been able to score and get kills with snapshots at even 900 yards.
In the same conditions with 190A8 (4x20), 500 yards hit is a triumph.

Offline -lynx-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 340
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2000, 11:05:00 AM »
Hmmmm... Last time I flew AH I fired ShVAKs... They seemed to be pretty effective. No convergence, no hassle - aim and fire  .

But seriously (and trying to keep away from sand-filled ping-pong balls ):

Your stats show that Hispano fired ~30% heavier round at ~5% higher muzzle velocity with the same x-section - 20mm - and (likely) similar aerodynamics. It was bound to fly farther and hit harder. Simple physics.

------------------
-lynx-
13 Sqn RAF

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2000, 11:25:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by -lynx-:
It was bound to fly farther and hit harder. Simple physics.

Agree with that, but:
1 - So farther? so more tense shots?
2 - Anyway Hispanos should have less or equal rate of fire than 151/20.

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1531
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #6 on: March 13, 2000, 12:49:00 PM »
do remember that 151's on 190 was synched to fire thought the propeller ( at least two in the wing roots ) therefore their ROF would be slower...

This horse has been beaten to death in every sim i've ever platyed  


------------------
Bartlomiej Rajewski
aka. Wing Commander fd-ski
Northolt Wing
1st Polish Fighter Wing
303 (Polish) Squadron "Kosciuszko" RAF
308 (Polish) Squadron "City of Cracow" RAF
315 (Polish) Squadron "City of Deblin" RAF

Turning 109s and 190s into scrap metal since 1998

If nothing makes you happier then burning 109 - come and join us - we're looking for few good men

Northolt Wing Headquarters

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2000, 02:53:00 PM »
Well, a single hispano shell should have quite more power than MG 151 shell, IMO. The kinetic energy is some 50% more in favor of hispano, by the numbers Mandoble gave.

It is amazing how it affects the arena though. Right now vast majority of Spits and cannon Hogs in arena follow the Santa way: HO HO HO.

I honestly can't remember that I have seen any of those planes actually avoid HO.

But that will change with the introduction of pair of MK 103s  

However, I believe the best qualities of MG 151 (compact, reliable, can be synchronized, better ammo fuzing mechanism) are not that important in this sim as they were in real life. Also, wasn't MG 151 ammunition (M geschoss etc.) more advanced than hispano ammunition ?



[This message has been edited by Hristo (edited 03-13-2000).]

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #8 on: March 13, 2000, 04:27:00 PM »
In AH, the 151/20 has a rof of 700 rpm, the Hispano Mk II 600 rpm.  Synchronized weapons are setup to deliver a 15% lower rof or something like that.



------------------
Doug "Pyro" Balmos
HiTech Creations

"If it's stupid but works, it's not stupid."

funked

  • Guest
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2000, 05:43:00 PM »
Hristo do you know how many Fw 190's carried the MK 103?

THREE!    

If we want MK 103's let's get the Do 335 MUUUUUUUUUAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAH A!

Actually if we get some T-34's I'd like an Hs 129 also!


[This message has been edited by funked (edited 03-13-2000).]

chisel

  • Guest
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #10 on: March 13, 2000, 08:58:00 PM »
Best come over to Warbirds. The differences between Mine shells and APHE have finally been modeled.


Pthhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!  

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2000, 12:04:00 AM »
So what are the differences?



------------------
Doug "Pyro" Balmos
HiTech Creations

No sniveling!

chisel

  • Guest
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #12 on: March 14, 2000, 12:35:00 AM »
Well, as Gazoo once said,

AP goes Zing!
HE goes boom!

How about a description of your Gunnery/ damage model Pyro?

And while I've got your attention will any changes be made to those Icons?  

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #13 on: March 14, 2000, 06:48:00 AM »
Funked, I had Me 410 and He 219 in mind.

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
MG151/20 vs Hispano II/V
« Reply #14 on: March 14, 2000, 07:54:00 AM »
Hristo, agree with you. mk103 was noticeably slower than 108 (firing rate), but with a muzzle velocity of more than 850 m/s and a round weight of 330 grams it is just an OVNI killer. The main problem is the weight of the gun, exceeding the mk108 in more than 80kg.