Author Topic: Hitech have you decided on disabling bomb drops on the ground for 1.08??  (Read 217 times)

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
curious.
heard somthing about implementing it but just through heresay
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675
I like this idea.  A couple of times I've killed myself by pressing secondary trigger rather than wep on takeoff.  (I've got them mapped to my stick right by each other.)

It would also be more realistic, I don't think bombs arm unless they fall a certain distance.  



------------------
bloom25
-MAW-
(Formerly of the)
THUNDERBIRDS

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Bloom, you are correct sir! Bombs had an inertia-based fuze that had to spin a few hundred times before arming. Kinda like modern 40mm grenades; stop the spin count at 200 (example only) and it won't arm. There was actually a problem in England during WW2 with bombs. Ordinance Men who stood in the bomb bay held the bomb as it was loaded to stop it from swaying. Unfortunately, bombs were known to break loose and crush the poor guy's feet. None ever blew that I know of. All I know is DANG that would hurt!! Now that there's more vehicles in AH, we've got a reason to stop the car-bombing.

Disable bombs on the ground please.


-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta Six's Flight School
Put the P-61B in Aces High
"With all due respect Chaplian, I don't think God wants to hear from me right now.
I'm gonna go out there and remove one of His creations from this universe.
And when I get back I'm gonna drink a bottle of Scotch like it was Chiggy von
Richthofen's blood and celebrate his death."
Col. McQueen, Space: Above and Beyond

 

Offline Twist

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
I sure hope so!! Seen it happen too many times, and did it to myself once taking off in a TBM, had to rework my stick settings.
Razer

Hellcat FG

"They porked the Hellcat? Why did they do that?"

Offline Midnight

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1809
      • http://www.brauncomustangs.org
Not that this should be a major concern, but...

If you go up in a P-51 with 1000lb bombs, you cannot land and re-arm on a CV. Once you have re-armed, the P-51 cannot get enough airspeed to take off again (if the 1000lb bombs are re-loaded) And, seeing as they explode, you cannot drop them before taking off again  

------------------
Wing up, Get kills, Be happy!

Midnight CO
 

The 412th is actively seeking P-51 Mustang pilots. E-mail me for more information          davidlj@charter.net  

[This message has been edited by Midnight (edited 05-11-2001).]

Offline iculus

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
You shouldn't be flying mustangs off carriers anyway!  

<S>IC

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
thats odd midnight, I think I rolled a heavy pony off the cv last time. will try again and film it.

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Disable Bombs on Ground - I don't agree.
But, HTC should simulate bombs model like a FS:SDOE.  

Regards,
Mitsu

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
 
Quote
If you go up in a P-51 with 1000lb bombs, you cannot land and re-arm on a CV. Once you have re-armed, the P-51 cannot get enough airspeed to take off again (if the 1000lb bombs are re-loaded) And, seeing as they explode, you cannot drop them before taking off again

I know that this was just kinda thrown in there Midnight... but it serves as a classic example of using realism (bombs not arming) as a justification for unrealistic behavior.

The only time this is an issue is when an M3 is sitting at a map room... or when a plane is vulching a spawn point.

If you don't want the bombs to take out the M3, take the 15 seconds to disable the ammo bunkers.

If you don't want a bomb to blow you up as you vulch, disable the ammo bunkers or don't get so low.

You see, htc already knew this would be a problem.  So, the players were enabled to prevent it from happening.

AKDejaVu

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Dont disable bombs on the ground.
Its simply way too much fun to drive a B26 a few miles up to a Panzer or Osti and bomb him on the ground. Plus its very realistic. I cant remember how many 8th Air Force Histories Ive read where the gallant B17s drove acrosss France and Germany fighting out with Tigers and Panthers, those guys sure were heroes......  

Anyone who supports car-bombing in any form whatsoever is a dweeb, idiot, amazinhunk, moron retard, quaker, bad for AH person who should simply go away. This is the kind of stuff that could make AH the laughing stock of flight sims and is certainly one of the greatest oversights so far by HTC. Get rid of the damn car-bombing stunt!!!

BTW Honestly DJV how would you be hurt by bombs being disabled on the ground, you seem to be the one most against this. Its not like your scared unimaginative self   will have to do anything to fix it....

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
Hitech have you decided on disabling bomb drops on the ground for 1.08??
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2001, 05:02:00 PM »
 
Quote
BTW Honestly DJV how would you be hurt by bombs being disabled on the ground, you seem to be the one most against this. Its not like your scared unimaginative self  will have to do anything to fix it....

I'm against the prolific use of the term "realism" as an argument promoting unrealistic behavior.

The means are there to stop car-bombing.  Use it.  The fact that people would rather whine about it tells me that people have found a way to sit in a chair, barely moving their body, staring at a monitor and still finding a way to be even lazier.  Bomb the fricking ammo dumps.. it is a strategic element added to the game for a specific reason.

Strategically, the main reason is that a base capture should involve risk and sacrifice.  If you disable the bombs on the ground, you remove the need to take out the ammo bunkers and bomber hangar.  That means you have to risk less to get a base instantly  capable of supporting bomber raids after instantly after it is captured.  If you want to gaurantee there will be no car-bombing.. you have to sacrifice the use of bombs at the base the second it is captured.

AKDejaVu