Pakistan: U.S. not hunting bin Laden on its turf, nor is it allowed to.

[SirLoin]

Pakistan is an excellant example of why we must not allow Iran to enrich uranium.

[2bighorn]

Pakistan is an excellant example of why we must not allow Iran to enrich uranium.

And how you're going to do that?

[Baitman]

Pakistan is an excellant example of why we must not allow Iran to enrich uranium.

Why because Pakistan has nuclear capabilities we have to actually respect their borders and requests. 

And how you're going to do that?

I guess he wants another war that no one can afford.

[bj229r]

I don't recall Pakistan threatening to wipe countries off the map, nor does Pakistan arm Hezbollah

[Yossarian]

BnZ so far I agree with you 100%!!!!

Why because Pakistan has nuclear capabilities we have to actually respect their borders and requests. 

I guess he wants another war that no one can afford.

This would seem to be implying that for some reason, we should not respect countries without nukes...?

If so, something is very, very seriously wrong with that outlook in my opinion.

<S>

Yossarian

[Baitman]

I don't recall Pakistan threatening to wipe countries off the map, nor does Pakistan arm Hezbollah

No, but don't believe everything you hear from the Associated Press. Check them out see who owns them. They are the only source for our news.

[BnZ]

BnZ so far I agree with you 100%!!!!

<S>

Yossarian

I'm sorry. I'll try harder next time. Read some of my other posts, there has got to be at least one opinion of mind that you will find worth reviling. 

[ZetaNine]

perhaps we need to send an american .... perhaps an american indian............to go over there and blow up 3000 people in one of thier cities..........then come back here........and hide out in some american indian reservation in nevada.........to which we tell pakistan....he is in a sovereign protected tribal area that we cannot and will not access.

[AKIron]

And how you're going to do that?

The real question is will we be able to stop Israel from doing it.

[Captain Virgil Hilts]

No, but don't believe everything you hear from the Associated Press. Check them out see who owns them. They are the only source for our news.

The AP is the only source we have for news?

Sounds like  to me.

[ZetaNine]

ap is the only source?  ap was powerful 30 years ago.  now....nobody controls news

anyone with a computer can access almost every news source on earth........

[moot]

Anyone having access to internet news does not equate to no one controling news, nor a majority reading the news on the net, and most likely not assessing a wide and balanced range of sources.

[ZetaNine]

Anyone having access to internet news does not equate to no one controling news, nor a majority reading the news on the net, and most likely not assessing a wide and balanced range of sources.

true that.

my point was that no entity wholly controls news content these days..whether that be print, broadcast, cable, internet, or any other means.
that may have died with hurst...in this country anyway.

[Carrel]

perhaps we need to send an american .... perhaps an american indian............to go over there and blow up 3000 people in one of thier cities..........then come back here........and hide out in some american indian reservation in nevada.........to which we tell pakistan....he is in a sovereign protected tribal area that we cannot and will not access.

I think a better comparison would be if a Canadian citizen went to Mexico, blew up 3000 Mexicans, and was then rumored to be hiding out in the USA- would we allow Mexico to send in military units to find the Canuck?

[RedTop]

The real question is will we be able to stop Israel from doing it.

Hope not. Let em have thier fun. They're entitled to get rid of some extra ordinance,