Author Topic: South Osetia under attack  (Read 116726 times)

Offline Russian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2992
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #855 on: August 14, 2008, 04:09:56 PM »
So, you are saying that no Russians were in Poland?

Can you tell the difference between state and country? Last time I checked when looking on old maps, I saw USSR or Soviet Union and not RUSSIA. 

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #856 on: August 14, 2008, 04:11:44 PM »
So, Are you saying that no Russians was in Poland?
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #857 on: August 14, 2008, 04:14:04 PM »
I wonder what happened to SOVIET UNION during that time.....  :eek:

Like that's an excuse?

« Last Edit: August 14, 2008, 04:24:15 PM by Hangtime »
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #858 on: August 14, 2008, 04:15:27 PM »
He will say that since that commie dirtball stalin was a Georgian by birth that it was the Georgians fault.  BTW South Ossetia IS Georgian territory... Russians had no damned business there to begin with.
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline Russian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2992
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #859 on: August 14, 2008, 04:17:25 PM »
Like that's an excuse?

You pitiful piece of.... Freakin frosts my cupcakes... former citizen of a nation that hosted, that created the most murderous regime in history, responsible for more death, murder, rape and horror than any other nation on earth... ever; made hitlers gestapo germany look like a kindergarten exercise in horror... with a potentate leader that was an operative of the second most viscous 'security service' in history; surpassed by only it's immediate predecessor the NKVD...

and you pull this BS outta yer sphincter and present it here as an EXCUSE..

offal... disgusting offal.

 Would you like to murder me? Get your hands on my warm blood? Cut parts of my limbs? Is that what you wish?

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #860 on: August 14, 2008, 04:18:50 PM »
Would you like to murder me? Get your hands on my warm blood? Cut parts of my limbs? Is that what you wish?

deleted. Voluntarily.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2008, 04:23:28 PM by Hangtime »
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline 007Rusty

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2634
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #861 on: August 14, 2008, 04:19:20 PM »
 :aok 

For those who need alittle history of what's taken place, I would highly suggest this gentleman's youtube presentation while spreading peanut butter on his face.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_p3hLtr5Ok

 :rock :rofl
C.O. 444TH AIR MAFIA
 WD40 (FS0)
 

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #862 on: August 14, 2008, 04:22:32 PM »
Would you like to murder me? Get your hands on my warm blood? Cut parts of my limbs? Is that what you wish?

This kind of stuff will get this thread locked down in a hurry.  Edit that before it happens please...
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #863 on: August 14, 2008, 04:24:44 PM »
Would you like to murder me? Get your hands on my warm blood? Cut parts of my limbs? Is that what you wish?

You wish to get us banned from this board by your trolling, thats why i pleaded to Skyzzy to ban you before you made us go awol.

Ill ask you again.

- Are you saying no Russians were in Poland?
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #864 on: August 14, 2008, 04:38:49 PM »
This kind of stuff will get this thread locked down in a hurry.  Edit that before it happens please...

seconded.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #865 on: August 14, 2008, 04:40:22 PM »
Why are you playing stupid? Notice video footage is from Fox news.


Unless it says Fox News in a language other than English....all I see is Liveleak.com. In the video itself, in the lower left corner it says...NTV with a logo I am not familiar with. So no, I don't see Fox News on the link you provided and I am not playing stupid either.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #866 on: August 14, 2008, 06:16:51 PM »
Would you like to murder me? Get your hands on my warm blood? Cut parts of my limbs? Is that what you wish?

wow :huh :confused: :eek: :uhoh
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #867 on: August 14, 2008, 06:36:27 PM »
Can you tell the difference between state and country? Last time I checked when looking on old maps, I saw USSR or Soviet Union and not RUSSIA. 

Russian, in my limited time on the BBS, that has got to be the worst semantic argument I've yet to see.

Because, in all truth, even if a Soviet (member of the USSR) soldier was estonian, latvian, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Georgian, or Russian proper, they were all controlled from Moscow, the center of the USSR. What happened in Katyn forest was from the Kremlin.

Offline Russian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2992
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #868 on: August 14, 2008, 07:27:13 PM »
Sorry for my outburst, but some members need to realize that I'm still a human and just because I share a slightly different view point - you don't need to treat me as hostile. Cool the frak down and communicate like you're for a western nation and not some raghead dirtbag that enjoys to cut heads off when people think differently.


Russian, in my limited time on the BBS, that has got to be the worst semantic argument I've yet to see.

Because, in all truth, even if a Soviet (member of the USSR) soldier was estonian, latvian, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Georgian, or Russian proper, they were all controlled from Moscow, the center of the USSR. What happened in Katyn forest was from the Kremlin.

So to you, Russia is still Soviet and still communist? Did you sleep in 90s and missed 'minor' change? Russia = Russian Federation = socialist / democratic (What-ever-else it is).

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #869 on: August 14, 2008, 08:17:34 PM »
Sorry for my outburst, but some members need to realize that I'm still a human and just because I share a slightly different view point - you don't need to treat me as hostile. Cool the frak down and communicate like you're for a western nation and not some raghead dirtbag that enjoys to cut heads off when people think differently.

Your glib comment that Russians were not in Poland... the inference that Russians are blameless for the slaughterhouse your countrymen made of eastern europe, that the NOW free nations of eastern europe have nothing to fear from russia is ludicrous.

And indefensible.

Shall I start trotting out the litany of horrific crimes committed by Russians post-Yeltsin?

Shall we start with Chechnya? Surely you recall the horrific dismemberment of Chechnya ?

Recognized as a distinct people since the 17th cent., the Chechens were the most active opponents of Russia's conquest (1818–1917) of the Caucasus. They fought bitterly during an unsuccessful 1850s rebellion led by Imam Shamyl. The Bolsheviks seized the region in 1918 but were dislodged in 1919 by counterrevolutionary forces under Gen. A. I. Denikin.

After Soviet rule was reestablished, the area was included in 1921 in the Mountain People's Republic. The Chechen Autonomous Region was created in 1922, and in 1934 it became part of the Chechen-Ingush Region, made a republic in 1936. After Chechen and Ingush units collaborated with the invading Germans during World War II, many residents were deported (1944) to Central Asia. Deportees were repatriated in 1956, and the republic was reestablished in 1957.

In 1991, as the Soviet Union disintegrated, the Chechen-dominated parliament of the republic declared independence as the Republic of Ichkeria, soon better known as Chechnya. In June, 1992, Russia granted Ingush inhabitants their own republic (Ingushetia) in the western fifth of the territory.

Tensions between the Russian government and that of Chechen president Dzhokhar Dudayev escalated into warfare in late 1994, as Russian troops arrived to crush the separatist movement. Grozny was devastated in the fighting, and tens of thousands died. Russian forces regained control of many areas in 1995, but separatist guerrillas controlled much of the mountainous south and committed spectacular terrorist actions in other parts of Russia. Fighting continued through 1996, when Dudayev was killed and succeeded by Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev. The Russians withdrew, essentially admitting defeat, following a cease-fire that left Chechnya with de facto autonomy.

Aslan Maskhadov, chief of staff of the Chechen forces, was elected president early in 1997 but appeared to have little control over the republic. Russian forces bombed and invaded Chechnya, capturing Grozny and forcing the rebels into mountain strongholds. Both sides have been accused of brutality and terrorizing noncombatants. In 2003 voters approved a new constitution for Chechnya, and Akhmad Kadyrov was subsequently elected president, but the election was generally regarded as neither free nor fair. Both the constitution and the president were backed by Russian government. Kadyrov was assassinated in 2004; Alu Alkhanov was elected to succeed him. Russian forces killed Maskhadov, who was considered a moderate Chechen rebel leader, in 2005 and Shamil Baseyev, a notorious and significant rebel commander, in 2006. Alkhanov resigned as president in 2007 after a power struggle with Prime Minister Ramzan Kadyrov, son of the former president. Ramzan Kadyrov was then appointed president by Russian president Putin.


Sound like a familiar chain of events?  Another round of Russians, viewing anybody but russians as vermin in play in Georgia now? I believe so.. so does any rational man capable of reading and understanding history... that is, anybody that's not russian in origin; carrying a guilt trip; refusing reality and substituting it with their own.

A russian trademark.

So to you, Russia is still Soviet and still communist? Did you sleep in 90s and missed 'minor' change? Russia = Russian Federation = socialist / democratic (What-ever-else it is).

Does it matter in the slightest what cloak your countrymen wear when they set out to crush yet another free and democratic republic??
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.