Author Topic: South Osetia under attack  (Read 117215 times)

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1080 on: August 15, 2008, 06:51:48 PM »
Boroda.....Saber rattling is one thing...using the Nuke referance is more than saber ratteling. Now if you can't see that...then your blind and not even thinking straight.

Your regime threatens us with nukes for how many? 63 years.

Your officials openly threaten to "pacify" us right now, should we STFU about it?...

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1081 on: August 15, 2008, 06:52:54 PM »
Quote
This is my last answer to you, I don't get paid for teaching you elementary logics. I wish you to go back to your 6th grade in September and learn well.

You telling someone to go back to school and learn.  :rofl
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6134
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1082 on: August 15, 2008, 06:53:46 PM »
Last time, this time slowly: US installs it's military objects, that threaten Russian armed forces, to use them in case of a nuclear war with Russia. Yes we are going to target them.

Ever wondered why bullet-proof wests are prohibited in most US states, even gun-friendly?

This is my last answer to you, I don't get paid for teaching you elementary logics. I wish you to go back to your 6th grade in September and learn well.

Since when are bullet proof vests illegal in most states? :rolleyes:
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1083 on: August 15, 2008, 06:54:08 PM »
But the thing is, WOULD Poland attack Russia?

It's not Poland, it;s US miltary base. Indirect aggression.

Enough with that.

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6134
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1084 on: August 15, 2008, 06:56:13 PM »
Your regime threatens us with nukes for how many? 63 years.

Your officials openly threaten to "pacify" us right now, should we hugs about it?...

WHEN did we threaten to "pacify" ANYONE? Where do you get this "pacify" crap anyway? Do you even know what the word means? Or are you just parroting more party propaganda?
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1085 on: August 15, 2008, 06:56:27 PM »
It's not Poland, it;s US miltary base. Indirect aggression.

Enough with that.

You can invade our ally Georgia and 'get away with it' but you arent gonna invade poland. And I bet Russia has it's eye on Poland like a gay guy checking you out from the other side of the bar.
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13370
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1086 on: August 15, 2008, 06:58:12 PM »
Bush is telling the ruskies to get the hell out of Georgia. I think they will obey.

What would Obama do? McCain?
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline 2bighorn

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1087 on: August 15, 2008, 06:58:54 PM »
You can invade our ally Georgia and 'get away with it' but you arent gonna invade poland. And I bet Russia has it's eye on Poland like a gay guy checking you out from the other side of the bar.

When was last time you looked at the world map?

Offline Megalodon

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1088 on: August 15, 2008, 06:59:53 PM »
Putin is more of a nut than the dood in Iran. U.S. should jump all over this.. BOOM MFer... Huh?..What? ....Summore? thats what I thought, get the hell out... NOW!
I'm sure the subs are there all ready.
Okay..Add 2 Country's at once, Australia and France next plane update Add ...CAC Boomerang and the Dewoitine D.520

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1089 on: August 15, 2008, 07:00:12 PM »
It's not Poland, it;s US miltary base. Indirect aggression.

Enough with that.

Indirect aggression? You really need to get a grip on reality. It's a purely defensive system for the US that happens to have a fringe benefit of being able to intercept missiles targetted at Poland. As long as your country doesn't plan on attacking Poland, you have nothing to worry about. Pretty simple really.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1090 on: August 15, 2008, 07:00:55 PM »
Your regime threatens us with nukes for how many? 63 years.

Your officials openly threaten to "pacify" us right now, should we hugs about it?...

Boroda....look..let me ask you in another way.

Has a U.S. official ever said that the USE OF NUKES IS AN OPTION 100 percent? Just a simple yes or no will do.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1091 on: August 15, 2008, 07:01:32 PM »
Quote
Bush is telling the ruskies to get the hell out of Georgia. I think they will obey.

You will know Bush is serious when he gives them 48 hours to get out of town.  :uhoh
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1092 on: August 15, 2008, 07:03:11 PM »
Bush is telling the ruskies to get the hell out of Georgia. I think they will obey.

What would Obama do? McCain?

...We need to see if they do, AK. That's the sum of the whole current problem right now. They've been simply trying to take advantage of any peace offers' thrown on the table, and they are still on the Georgian' side of the Ossetian Border.

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1093 on: August 15, 2008, 07:04:19 PM »
You will know Bush is serious when he gives them 48 hours to get out of town.  :uhoh

IF he does.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #1094 on: August 15, 2008, 07:04:53 PM »
Putin is more of a nut than the dood in Iran. U.S. should jump all over this.. BOOM MFer... Huh?..What? ....Summore? thats what I thought, get the hell out... NOW!
I'm sure the subs are there all ready.
The US won't mess with anybody with the ability to fight back... :lol
Iraq 'might' have nukes (read; doesn't), US invades.
Iran is trying to create a civilian nuclear program, which would give them the ability to have nuclear missiles; US threatens to invade.
North Korea makes it clear that they want to make offensive nuclear weapons; US negotiates with the unspoken possibility of military action on the table.
Russia, which already has nuclear missles, invades a small country; US wags their finger.

The US won't intervene in this matter, I don't think. I certainly hope we don't, at least.