I think that's why we haven't had even stronger action from Russia. They know that they are a token gesture - but NATO encroachment is something they will avoid at (nearly) all costs.
AKIron - not looking at this from a Russian perspective would be a very dangerous thing indeed.
Yes it's completely ineffective against any russian launches. Actually at this point in time it's completely ineffective period. It's only practical purpose is survieliance, that and making some rich men richer on the american tax dollar. Of course it's purported intent is a threat to a balance that has kept the peace. Sounds like Poland got a sweet deal out of it though, the US is going to bolster their air force and air defence. About time Poland saw some kickbacks.
The russian general really didn't threaten Poland, he just stated that obvious. That by making themselves part of a defense against russian nuclear warfare they have made themselves a target in a nuclear conflict. Of course Poland used to be a US missle target for many years, so they're probably not too concerned.
I was pleased to learn that the russians were working with the georgian police. Transitioning control of cities over to georgian police, not just pulling out and leaving a vacume of violence and looting in their wake. It's very good that they are taking measures to prevent this.
America says that it wants russia to join europe and the west. What russia hears is that america want's russia to become subordinate to america like the rest of europe. Nations don't have enemies, they have competitors. The two most powerful nations in the world are allways going to be at odds with eachother. A sad affect of the natural drives of the human animal.
There is only one way that a population that violently want's independence can be rules. And it isn't pretty. And is it right to do so? Is the preservation of geographic deliniations more important than the preservation of people?
Just like america, russia only intervenes to stop ethnicide when it serves her interest. I didn't see anybody clamoring to the UN's aid in the congo or sudan.
What we're seeing is a lack of ability to emphatize with advisaries. It doesn't matter what one's intent is, what really matters is what your advisary believes your intent to be. That is what is going to determine the course of events. If you haven't watched it yet, I recomend you watch "Fog of War", and then watch McNamara's interview with Charlie Rose. You can dig it up on the net.
And stop watching TV as much as you can. It really does make you stupid. It is a form neurofeedback conditioning, it trains people to feel rather than think. It makes people more guilable and susceptible to preachers (politicians) who use qips and soundbites to push our emotional buttons. The brain is plastic, it can change shape. Regions of the brain can grow or shrink, pathways widen or wither due to different kinds of stimuli. For example neurofeedback training, trauma, music lessons. EEGs have shown that a person watching TV has less brain activity than a person who is sleeping. This probably explains the reason why people burn more calories sleeping than they do watching TV.