Sclowy, you must be young and it shines from your lack of understanding and arrogance.
"First part, Spit is a tail dragger, and is heavier than a 109, which is why the spit needed bigger wings."
It still has somewhat lower wingloading and similar power leading to a higher ROC, but less topspeed for each hp. Did I say it was easy to land? No. Although famous for the lack of tendency of dipping a wing...
"I'll take slats, better turning to get into firing position to begin with. (not represented in AH)"
This is in AH and even visually represented. (it was already in the FM before you could see it.) I presume that you actually fly the 109 every now and then.
"From your logic, the spits bigger wings were ONLY for landing."
How on earth did you come to that. Ok, lower wingloading allows slower speed vefore stall for instance, as well as tight turns and a better ROC. Which is basically what the designer had in mind, this is a defensive aircraft.
"Gunther didn't tell you anything anyways."
Don't have a picture of us together, but I assure you I call him every now and then and ask about WW2 stuff. We also spent some time together some years back. Last autumn I planned to see him, but he had to go to an operation on the estimated day on arrival....
Maybe there are some flyable (and increasing) but not in England.
Sources? That would be rare this game doesn't post any sources.
"Comon Angus, why don't you post your game name so we can find out what you fly?"
I already did, you missed it . Fly for rooks mostly. Hehe, Furball shot me down the other day
It's a shared account so take it with a grain of salt. Name is sarcastically "Daimler". (Yes the 109 had a Daimler-Benz engine)
And here is some icing on the cake, a brand new 109 landing crash, flown by a German pilot in Berlin:
(there was another 109 crash in Germany in April AFAIK) Both landing accidents.
http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/military-aviation/44838-bf-109-crash.html 
