Obama encourages his minions to spead his lies and get in people's faces

[Slamfire]

Wow Slamfire is that where you learned to debate?  If you stoop any lower than insults you may see your reflection

 

[DrDea]

Because the Democrats don't trust you.  You're a "gun-nut" and need to submit to their change.  So sayeth Barrack Hussein Obama (peace be unto him)

  Allah Achtard Allah achtard.

[Nwbie]

His obvious inability to stop coming back to prove to his audience that he is not displaying in his conversation what I've identified will intesify as no one validates him. He has come back twice now with this relatively simple help from me reminds me of the wealthy Liberals who would pay me to listen to them talk the same way. I wish I was getting $250 pr/hr for this....

Liberals are addicted to proving they are not who they think others see them as. I made alotta money in San Diego by not agreeing with them for a year. When I finally could no longer take listening to them I agreed with them and they stopped using my services.

Any bets on how addicted he is to defending his fantasy image of himself he sells to this audience? Wanna hold a lottery?

bustr - based on that post -- you didn't leave the profession,,, you just plain didn't belong in the profession.. except maybe as a patient, you more than likely sucked at it...

[Nwbie]

wtf?

Decaf.

and have somebody check your meds.

seriously.

(Image removed from quote.)

Lol Hangtime
it was a gag gift dude - figure it out
Funny how it is a goofy rant ..if you are not the author...
you post funny pictures...other peoples funny pictures, but alas, no substance, no actual content - other than - hey look at me--i can at least be funny, i may not have anything important to say - but hey - i know how to link pictures...
There may actually be a profession somewhere in there for you.. I am sure there are bloggers looking for people to comb through photobucket and flikr and the others like that ... you know.. short bus people jobs... you have a talent there, don't let anyone convince you otherwise

[lazs2]

newbie.. you have created a threat that does not exist.   You tried to make it out like I had threatened you when that was not the case at all.

If you felt that I had threatened you.. that would only mean that you were going to attack me.   I have no problem with you thinking anything you want.. that is your right.. it is when you try to take away my god given individual rights that we will be in conflict.   You are the one who has the false bravado...  you "vote" to take away someones rights.... you have others enforce it at the barrel of a gun.   You are the threat not me.

It is not isolationist to simply want others to leave your rights alone.   Don't debate me and I won't show you how wrong you are.. don't try to force your will on me by taking away my rights and I won't use force to stop you... simple huh?  no threat at all.. you would have to be the one initiating the escalation of violence.   

You would be the one putting me and mine in danger.   

In part... it is youth.. it is a common mistake of youth to feel invincible. that they don't need anything but their wits and fists to defend themselves..  they have no experiance so how could they know?  by the time they learn it is often too late.

lazs

[Nwbie]

newbie.. you have created a threat that does not exist.   You tried to make it out like I had threatened you when that was not the case at all.

If you felt that I had threatened you.. that would only mean that you were going to attack me.   I have no problem with you thinking anything you want.. that is your right.. it is when you try to take away my god given individual rights that we will be in conflict.   You are the one who has the false bravado...  you "vote" to take away someones rights.... you have others enforce it at the barrel of a gun.   You are the threat not me.

It is not isolationist to simply want others to leave your rights alone.   Don't debate me and I won't show you how wrong you are.. don't try to force your will on me by taking away my rights and I won't use force to stop you... simple huh?  no threat at all.. you would have to be the one initiating the escalation of violence.   

You would be the one putting me and mine in danger.   

In part... it is youth.. it is a common mistake of youth to feel invincible. that they don't need anything but their wits and fists to defend themselves..  they have no experiance so how could they know?  by the time they learn it is often too late.

lazs

Where do you get I felt a threat?
I laffed at your post that you felt it was your right to kill someone who voted differently than you...and you justified it saying the supreme court gives you that right
thats it... that is all i posted.. I continue to laugh at that statement

"In part... it is youth" -- lol - how old do you think i am?  Perhaps it is a mistake of being a codger... thinking you already know all the answers --- and because someone differs in their opinion, it is a mistake of youth..

You by the way, have yet to show me how wrong i am,here is one for you-- ask "your Mexican" if you are a racist...

[bustr]

Nwbie,

Along with being addicted to making this audience see you as the fantacy you see your self, you now are being normative for a Liberal by calling Laz a racist and insulting his girlfriend. You have just reduced her relationship with Laz to the low level of personal derision you hold Laz by her choice of association to him. You have villified her to insult Laz which strips her of being human or a woman.

So again gentelmen since I'm not getting $250 pr/hr here listening to a Liberal scream about how crazy everyone else is and insult their family members. At least a lottery on how many more times he will respond to this thread because of his addiction to his self image and this baited attention.......

His conduct here is what I listened to for a year in San Diego from wealty Liberals behind closed doors. The anonymous nature of the internet is no different than the anonymous nature of a closed door.

[Nwbie]

Nwbie,

Along with being addicted to making this audience see you as the fantacy you see your self, you now are being normative for a Liberal by calling Laz a racist and insulting his girlfriend. You have just reduced her relationship with Laz to the low level of personal derision you hold Laz by her choice of association to him. You have villified her to insult Laz which strips her of being human or a woman.

So again gentelmen since I'm never got $250 pr/hr ever listening to a Liberal scream about how crazy everyone else is and insult their family members. At least a lottery on how many more times he will respond to this thread because of his addiction to his self image and this baited attention.......

His conduct here is what I listened to for a year in San Diego from wealty Liberals behind closed doors. The anonymous nature of the internet is no different than the anonymous nature of a closed door.

fantasy
anyway - bustr...  if you are referring to the statement - ask your.....
yes that was wrong...I was in error...I assumed when I read a former post of his, he was referring to a cook or something, I personally did not know he referred to his girlfriend as "My Mexican"... which is what I was referring to... actually you just surprised me, surprised the H out of me,
But, I still think the statement he made about the supreme court giving him the right to kill someone who votes differently than him, is off the wall insane, and if you agree to his statement, well , you know what I think you are...
And I think you stories about wealthy liberals is funny...and can just imagine how many referrals you got in that job, thank jod there was a computer job opening...
normative..lol..nice word
To laz's relationship association, like i said , I jumped to a conclusion, but you, I can very much tell you sucked at therapy work.
Don't respond, please, your alcoholic rants are boring me

[Hangtime]

fantasy
anyway - bustr...  if you are referring to the statement - ask your.....
yes that was wrong...I was in error...I assumed when I read a former post of his, he was referring to a cook or something, I personally did not know he referred to his girlfriend as "My Mexican"... which is what I was referring to... actually you just surprised me, surprised the H out of me,
But, I still think the statement he made about the supreme court giving him the right to kill someone who votes differently than him, is off the wall insane, and if you agree to his statement, well , you know what I think you are...
And I think you stories about wealthy liberals is funny...and can just imagine how many referrals you got in that job, thank jod there was a computer job opening...
normative..lol..nice word
To laz's relationship association, like i said , I jumped to a conclusion, but you, I can very much tell you sucked at therapy work.
Don't respond, please, your alcoholic rants are boring me

double caf-caf late' with a twist?

[Getback]

Seriously this is a non-issue. The "gun-nuts" in this country are comical. They are the most paranoid bunch of people around. Living life afraid of your neighbor sounds really enjoyable. Like I said before, there are so many more issues you should be concerned about rather than the 2nd ammendment.

2nd amendment is the constitution like any other amendment and it should be guarded. You give up one right be prepared to lose more.

[bustr]

Nwbie, They made it very simple to make money with a tiny bit of help from myself like I have been doing with you. And like you they kept coming back over and over again. Because like you, they were addicted to their fantasy image of themselves and proving they were ok. They kept paying me money to spend an hour a week proving they were ok to themselves with my company in the room. I did very littel work and made money.

Anyone wanna bet how many more times Nwbie comes back with the tiny bit of help I'm giving him?

[lazs2]

Bustr.. thanks but I did know what he was trying to do and it just made me shake my head in wonder at the ignorance and indocrtination of liberals.

Newbie.. I actually said "my mexicans"   My girlfriend and my grand daughter..   I don't have to ask either if I am a racist or not.   It is not as important to me as it is to you.. the perception part.. what people "feel".

I don't need pats on the back for having a mexican girlfriend.. I just like her.   I don't give a crap if she is or isn't.. I don't have affirmative action program for girlfriends..  It is on a merit basis.   Relatives?  can't choose em but I think that the combo of mexican and me makes some good looking kids.

negros?  never seen one that I thought was attractive.. there ya go.. run with it.   Takes a lot of white to make em look attractive most of the time..  that of course is just a personal taste issue...  it is what it is.. again.. no affirmative action or striving for "diversity" in my mating process.   Just merit as I see it.

As for your gun issue..  you, like 99% of all liberals.. know nothing about guns.. that is apparent.. yet.. you wish to exercise some "reasonable" restrictions..  How can you do that if you don't know squat about em?

It was wondered how liberal anti gun types could like a WWII game..  I wonder the same..  Almost every weapon used in WWII would be banned by you and your ilk under "reasonable" restrictions.   Carrying any kind of firearm around to protect yourself would be banned by osamabinbiden if he could.

Soooo.. to say you like firearms but then to make it so they are useless to the owners is such a huge lie that it is disgusting.

[Buzzard7]

Well I suppose he is absolutely right it is just a game. Still it makes you wonder. Sure there is no reality. You are still taking a weapon and trying to do harm to your enemy. All electronic signals yes,but it is still the intent of kill the bad guy. Like saying your are anti-war, but for abortion. Ok to kill babies,not ok to kill adults.

In the gun ban issue the weapons are not the problem. The criminals that use them are the problem. If you ban certain weapons it only effects the law abiding citizens. The criminals will still be able to get them. You want to keep them from the criminals you need to stop their source. Good luck with that! Their source works very well with the supply and demand laws.

Nwbie I am pro-war and pro-choice. I am neither Dem or Rep. We are the ones you need to convince this election. So far your side is losing with most of us. Do not start spouting off what the polls say. They are wrong. In my state alone more of us are leaning right. We love our castle law here.

TwentyFo, I am a gun nut. You should be worried about that. When the Gov't tries to take away my right to own any weapon I choose your kind will be the first on the list.

[FrodeMk3]

Well I suppose he is absolutely right it is just a game. Still it makes you wonder. Sure there is no reality. You are still taking a weapon and trying to do harm to your enemy. All electronic signals yes,but it is still the intent of kill the bad guy. Like saying your are anti-war, but for abortion. Ok to kill babies,not ok to kill adults.

In the gun ban issue the weapons are not the problem. The criminals that use them are the problem. If you ban certain weapons it only effects the law abiding citizens. The criminals will still be able to get them. You want to keep them from the criminals you need to stop their source. Good luck with that! Their source works very well with the supply and demand laws.

Nwbie I am pro-war and pro-choice. I am neither Dem or Rep. We are the ones you need to convince this election. So far your side is losing with most of us. Do not start spouting off what the polls say. They are wrong. In my state alone more of us are leaning right. We love our castle law here.

TwentyFo, I am a gun nut. You should be worried about that. When the Gov't tries to take away my right to own any weapon I choose your kind will be the first on the list.

When you guys' come on here making threats, veiled or not, putting people on "lists"...You give people IN Gov't. a reason to disarm the rest of us. I like my guns, too...I'd hate to think that they will be taken away based not on how many people are actually killed in a crime, but on the threat of further crimes' promised on an internet board.

[Mr No Name]

But Frode... look at it this way, the federal government should never be so powerful or intrusive as to worry about anyone threatening anyone for any reason. (except the president) His statement was not just a threat, it was political about his reaction to a government overstepping their bounds. It is ACTION that state and local government only should act on... We should ALL be far more concerned about a federal government that is capable of a murders like those in Ruby Ridge than someone on an internet BBS saying "You might be on my list".