Author Topic: Debate  (Read 2039 times)

Offline A8TOOL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1720
      • http://fdrs.org/banking_history.html
Re: Debate
« Reply #45 on: September 26, 2008, 10:13:05 PM »
Senator McCain (John)  should have started calling Obama Osama toward the end.

I wonder how that would have played out???

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #46 on: September 26, 2008, 10:14:11 PM »


Yes exactly so 18 + 6 = 24  Where will the other 75 billion come from? Oh yea he's not cutting spending to Israel. So where will the other 82 billion come from? That's only 100 billion, but McCain has claimed "100's of billions" on a few occasions.
"strafing"

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #47 on: September 26, 2008, 10:16:12 PM »
Like who, the people who ain't paying any taxes ?

I damn sure pay my taxes and I'm quite sure I could use a tax break much more than a oil company who just raked in the biggest profits of all time for any industry in the last year. As well as the year before this one.

Do you honestly think the oil industry deserves a tax break more than the average American?
"strafing"

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: Debate
« Reply #48 on: September 26, 2008, 10:16:26 PM »
Yes exactly so 18 + 6 = 24  Where will the other 75 billion come from? Oh yea he's not cutting spending to Israel. So where will the other 82 billion come from? That's only 100 billion, but McCain has claimed "100's of billions" on a few occasions.

You said the only way to cut 100's of billions was to cut funding from defense and Israel.

I showed that your comment about Israel funding was insignificant.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Kaw1000

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
Re: Debate
« Reply #49 on: September 26, 2008, 10:16:45 PM »
BTW Crockett  as you could see McCain was'nt a coward or trying to dodge the debate
like your  earlier post...please keep you bull crap post on that issue to yourself   Thank you
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 10:18:30 PM by Kaw1000 »
See Rule# 5 on just about every thread!

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Debate
« Reply #50 on: September 26, 2008, 10:18:39 PM »
I have a serious question.

How much bullsiht has seeped into the Russian-Georgian conflict?

Am I wrong in thinking that the US government has totally managed/twisted an argument that really few americans ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT?

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Re: Debate
« Reply #51 on: September 26, 2008, 10:20:06 PM »
Obamessiah voters think Obamessiah won.

McC voters think McC won.

Libertarians think they're both more of the same crap we've had since Reagan...20 years of lying bass turds. Nothing I saw would move me from Bob Barr to either one of these business-as-usual-retreads.

Undecided people probably saw nothing that would make them decide. They'll be waiting for Round 2 and probably Round 3, praying that they will see something that will give them enough faith to make a decision.

I don't like either one of them. I'd call it a draw. McC wins on foreign policy, Obamessiah wins on economy. Obamessiah stutters a lot but looks into the camera more, better connection with the audience. McC more forceful and direct but looks down at Lehrer too much, need to connect with the audience.

I think either one of them could have won the election tonight on the economy. All that was necessary was for a clear statement in support of the TAXPAYERS instead of Ritchie Rich on the Wall Street Bailout. There have been several plans put forward that solve this crisis from the bottom up instead of the top down. If either one had proposed a bottom up plan, it would have been game/set/match. But both are too chickenshirt to be that bold.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 10:22:07 PM by Toad »
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #52 on: September 26, 2008, 10:20:16 PM »
You said the only way to cut 100's of billions was to cut funding from defense and Israel.

I showed that your comment about Israel funding was insignificant.

It's not showing it's insignificant.. I covered that point in the other topic about this issue. The fact that it's around 6 billion a year that gets sent to Israel is very significant. Israel is the largest recipient of foreign aid money. The fact that it's just over 6 billion and that is a very large number shows that McCain cutting 100's of billions is a pipe dream.
"strafing"

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Re: Debate
« Reply #53 on: September 26, 2008, 10:20:20 PM »
Damn near a draw....IMO "vote the issues" opinion.

I'm still voting for Walter.

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #54 on: September 26, 2008, 10:21:25 PM »
Damn near a draw....IMO "vote the issues" opinion.

I'm still voting for Walter.

I'd agree, I think they both had their strong points in the expected areas for each.
"strafing"

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Re: Debate
« Reply #55 on: September 26, 2008, 10:21:30 PM »
AH AH AH AH Obama AH AH AH can't talk without a prompter!

Wholly!

McCain came off the experienced gentleman, Obama, stuttering aside, looked like he was irked with McCain.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: Debate
« Reply #56 on: September 26, 2008, 10:23:04 PM »
It's not showing it's insignificant.. I covered that point in the other topic about this issue. The fact that it's around 6 billion a year that gets sent to Israel is very significant. Israel is the largest recipient of foreign aid money. The fact that it's just over 6 billion and that is a very large number shows that McCain cutting 100's of billions is a pipe dream.

Your post seems oxymoronic:

It's not insignificant, but it is insignificant.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #57 on: September 26, 2008, 10:25:47 PM »
BTW Crockett  as you could see McCain was'nt a coward or trying to dodge the debate
like your  earlier post...please keep you bull crap post on that issue to yourself   Thank you

McCain was the one who said he wasn't going to go, then waited to the last min to agree to show up. I also don't think I ever said he was a coward, I said it looked like he was trying to "dodge" the debates. Also don't tell me how to talk about someone, when practically any post you have addressed to me has been some lame attempt at a personal bash.
"strafing"

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Re: Debate
« Reply #58 on: September 26, 2008, 10:26:40 PM »
"neener neener neener".    ??   you got anything better than that?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Debate
« Reply #59 on: September 26, 2008, 10:31:31 PM »
Your post seems oxymoronic:

It's not insignificant, but it is insignificant.

The fact that 6 billion out of 100's of billions makes it seem insignificant to the whole point. The fact that 6 billion is actually a very large number makes the point that it's very significant to what McCain claims he can cut. There is no way McCain can actually cut 100's of billions. I would be amazed if McCain could actually cut 20 billion with out causing the loss of jobs in this country.

McCain claims he will cut all earmarks..Well guess what that means cutting a hell of a lot of jobs. Earmarks are not all wasteful spending. Many of them go for needed things around the country. Many of them help supplement defense contracts and other govt contracts. Claiming he will cut all of them is total BS and if he does he will undoubtedly cut jobs.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 10:35:54 PM by crockett »
"strafing"