BaldEagle: we all know about the trims... yes the K key (and I to trim down), this isn't the question. And I'm sure the 109s get control stiffness at some speed sure, how much compression is one question.
The Bf 109 does not suffer from compressability like the P-38, P-47, and on some models of the Spitfire. The Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Mitsubishi Zero had the exact opposite problem, the controls were too weak. At higher speeds the pilot simply couldn't move the controls because there was too much airflow over the control surfaces. The planes would become difficult to maneuver and at high enough speeds even less maneuverable aircraft could out-turn them.
A second question is why does it seem that 109s are the ONLY planes to suffer from it, 109s seem to have to fight up, since down only gives E to the opponent and freezes the 109. Every other plane in the game, that I've tested, might start creaking but will still control, 109's freeze solid.
The Bf 109 isn't the only plane. Take up a Zeke and put it into a high speed dive and the same thing will happen as it does with the Bf 109. There is no 'bias' or conspiracy on HTC's part to make the Bf 109 look bad, it was a problem that plagued the plane in real life and it is modeled in here quite accurately.
This is just a case of a player (you) not understanding or being able to comprehend what is happening because your closed mind won't allow you to see anything other than some bizarre conspiracy towards Luftwaffe planes. Honestly, read about the planes you fly in this game.
A side note: A year ago or so on my old acct, I tried to roll with my 190 at speed, and I broke both airlerons on me wings at the same time, never heard of that before. This was back when the sky was full with la7s.
I give HTC some credit but how many accts have to quit for it to bias not to happen?
Lets not even mention shamed Stuka or Ju88 or ta152s, planes in the game for one reason, to be shot down.
If you broke the wings of a FW 190, it's because
you screwed up, it's as simple as that. You let yourself get way to fast and you pulled way to many G forces trying to pull out, it over stressed the wings and they snapped. It's something that is rather hard to do in a FW 190, congratulations as you're one of the very few that I've heard of since I've been playing that has screwed the pooch so bad that they've snapped their wings.
I don't see how Ju-87D-3, Ju-88 or the TA 152 helps support your innane conspiracy theory. The Ju-87D-3 is a very effective dive bomber and with the BFB it can carry, it can waste any target it drops on. Just like real life though, don't expect to survive for very long if you enter into an area that your side doesn't have fighter cover over, otherwise the Ju-87D-3 will be fodder. Though, in capable hands, it can sting an unwary fighter pilot. The Ju-88 is also quite capable and carries a decent bomb load and is one of the better anti-maritime bombers. The TA 152 is a high altitude fighter and shines best at high altitudes, the lower if flies, the lower it's performance though in some cases, there is one or two pilots that can make it shine at low altitudes. Again, pilot skill will vary your experience.
BaldEagle, heres a keys for you, Alt-I to see that the whole sky is f4u, p51, spity, la7... proof of the modeling, historic is the question.
Don't see how icons is proof of any type of modeling but then I don't have your confused thought process.
ack-ack
