Author Topic: Things we DO NOT need...  (Read 2582 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2008, 12:35:49 PM »
I completely agree that for BoB it is a necessity; for the other 47 weeks in a year; totally not needed. :)

Then there's FSO, snapshots, the Early War Arena, scenarios....
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2008, 12:55:27 PM »
Nothing is wrong, O great leader of the He-111 requester minions.  Another hanger queen is a waste of resources and time, a plane that will see lots of use is a good investment.  Proper economies of scale and all that. 

And please do continue to ignore the inclusion of the much lacking VVS items in lieu of one German pseudo-buff that will have neglible impact on the game; aside from making another easy kill in LW arena.  :)
Hah... Nothing is wrong.... Both sides are supposed to be represented adequately. Same as historians provide information of what was going on during the war behind both enemy lines, not just one side. The HE-111 would not be a superior bomber by any means, considering it's not as great as the JU-88. Yet it would be an advancement in further representing the Axis bomber's plane-set.

Therefore I consider any additions to the already superior allied bomber plane-set to be silly, since there's so much to be added to the lacking axis bomber plane-set, from all three countries.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2008, 01:13:58 PM »
Hah... Nothing is wrong.... Both sides are supposed to be represented adequately. Same as historians provide information of what was going on during the war behind both enemy lines, not just one side. The HE-111 would not be a superior bomber by any means, considering it's not as great as the JU-88. Yet it would be an advancement in further representing the Axis bomber's plane-set.

Then remove the P-61 from my list and add the SM.79; the Italians (you know, the other 1/3 of the major Axis powers) have NO buff yet, not even ONE of their planes can carry a bomb right now.  I did place the D4Y on my list, thus the Axis were represented in the bomber category now they get two bomber slots on my list.  Fully 1/5 of the list. :D


Fight Like a Girl

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2008, 01:16:03 PM »
Nothing is wrong, O great leader of the He-111 requester minions.  Another hanger queen is a waste of resources and time, a plane that will see lots of use is a good investment.  Proper economies of scale and all that. 

Yet, you say we need the MiG-3, which would be the worst plane on that list. :rofl

Out of all the VVS aircraft we do need, IMO, the MiG3 is not one of them... The I15/16 yes... Yak1, Yak7, Yak3, LaGG3, yes... Pe2, Tu2, yes (both of which would probably be hangar queens anyway because they're not American or British 4-engines that carry 6000 lbs+ of ord). But the MiG3 was a dog.

However, with the exception of the He111 and the I16 on your first list, and the MiG3, A26 and the two vehicles at the tail end of your second list, I for the most part agree with you.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2008, 01:21:13 PM by Motherland »

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2008, 01:38:57 PM »
Yet, you say we need the MiG-3, which would be the worst plane on that list. :rofl

Out of all the VVS aircraft we do need, IMO, the MiG3 is not one of them... The I15/16 yes... Yak1, Yak7, Yak3, LaGG3, yes... Pe2, Tu2, yes (both of which would probably be hangar queens anyway because they're not American or British 4-engines that carry 6000 lbs+ of ord). But the MiG3 was a dog.

However, with the exception of the He111 and the I16 on your first list, and the MiG3, A26 and the two vehicles at the tail end of your second list, I for the most part agree with you.

Then put in the D.520 in place of the MiG-3, heck France is not even represented in AH yet; it is not if they didn't fight in the war...oh wait :lol

Thank you for the rest of your support regarding the list.


Fight Like a Girl

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2008, 02:13:01 PM »
You know the G.55 wont be added didn't see that much action He-111 or Do-17 or Do-217 would be nice to have panther don't need the A-26.
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2008, 02:29:22 PM »
Then put in the D.520 in place of the MiG-3, heck France is not even represented in AH yet; it is not if they didn't fight in the war...oh wait :lol

Thank you for the rest of your support regarding the list.

Actually, there's a Ju-88 with a French skin!  It would also be possible to have a French P-38.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2008, 02:33:23 PM »
Actually, there's a Ju-88 with a French skin!  It would also be possible to have a French P-38.
There no French tanks ha. :rofl :rofl :rofl
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2008, 02:45:45 PM »
You know the G.55 wont be added didn't see that much action He-111 or Do-17 or Do-217 would be nice to have panther don't need the A-26.
Could you re-phrase the last part? Is it the panther or the A-26 that you don't think we need? Or is it both?
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2008, 02:47:46 PM »
Could you re-phrase the last part? Is it the panther or the A-26 that you don't think we need? Or is it both?
Don't need the A-26 Panther need to be added.
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #25 on: October 03, 2008, 04:33:20 PM »
Quote
Don't need the A-26. Panther need to be added.

*loans glock a "." *
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #26 on: October 03, 2008, 04:33:58 PM »
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #27 on: October 03, 2008, 04:35:51 PM »
1) He-111

2) King Tiger

3) B-29

4) IS-2/3

5) Submarines

6) Dukw

7) I-16

8) Me-323

9) Panther

10) Nooks

What we Do need

1) Crusader MkIII/IV

2) Beaufighter

3) A-26

4) Pe-2

5) P-61

6) MiG-3 or D.520

7) G.55

8) D4Y

9) Skdzf 251/9 (carrying 5 troops)

10) StuG III or Su-85


We need all that stuff.  Not sub, what is a noob and King tiger was develop but the weight was too much to move.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline bluefalcon32

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #28 on: October 03, 2008, 04:46:19 PM »
BUT WE NEED TEH B29 WITH NOOKS!!!!   :D

no, but seriously, you put a p61 night fighter above my He 111 and I-16?
« Last Edit: October 03, 2008, 04:50:05 PM by bluefalcon32 »

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Things we DO NOT need...
« Reply #29 on: October 03, 2008, 04:47:57 PM »
BUT WE NEED TEH B29 WITH NOOKS!!!!
Ya sure you use it and you get ban for life how that sound? :t
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.