Author Topic: FSO Proposal  (Read 5637 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
FSO Proposal
« on: October 13, 2008, 01:02:37 PM »
Ok, this one would take some doing, since we don't have a map, (I have drawn a concept "theater" map encompassing all of New Britain and New Ireland, parts of New Guinea, the northern end of Bougainville and the surrounding smaller islands. The map is drawn roughly to 1:1 scale based on a 512x512 terrain).

Fortress Rabaul

November, 1943...

After more than a year of bloody fighting the Americans have succeeded in driving up the Solomon Islands and have landed on Bouganville. Although Japanese resistance on the island continues, the American leadership has set their sights on the next phase in their battle plan: The elimination of Rabaul.

By August 1943 it was decided that attempting to seize the island would be too costly, so instead the Allied command in the Pacific decided that the ports and airfields on Rabaul are to be pounded into rubble, and the heavy defenses of the island be bypassed in favor of easier and faster objectives elsewhere.

Substantial damage to Japanese supply efforts had already been inflicted upon the Japanese at the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, and the new generation of American fleet carriers are in the Pacific. Meanwhile, the Japanese carrier fleet has suffered heavy damage from the Battles of the Coral Sea and Midway, and they have no flattops still operating in the South Pacific. Most of their carrier fleet has been sunk, and the big Zuikaku and Shokaku have been withdrawn for repairs following damage received during the campaigns of 1942 and 1943. Striking from bases throughout New Guinea and the the Solomons, the pilots of the US Army Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps are poised to deliver a knock-out blow, and render one of the last major Japanese strongholds in the South Pacific a useless ruin.

United States:

F6F Hellcat (from carriers only)
F4U-1A Corsair (from Bougainville bases only)
FM-2 Wildcat (from carriers only)
P-38J Lightning
P-40E Warhawk
P-39Q Airacobra
SBD Dauntless
TBM Avenger
B-24J
B-25H (limited numbers)
PT Boat


Japanese to be drawn from:
A6M2 Zero
A6M5 Zero
Ki-61 "Tony"
Ki-84 "Frank" (limited numbers)
N1K2-J "George" (limited numbers)
Ki-67 "Peggy" (limited numbers)
D3A "Val"
B5N "Kate"

Objectives:

The obvious American objective is the reduction of the port and airfields of Rabaul. Additional targets (particularly for the B-25H and PT boats) are Japanese convoys (task groups of DDs and CAs only). They must also defend their carriers and land bases from Japanese counter-attack. The Japanese must defend Rabaul at all costs. They must also strike at the American carriers supporting the assault, and American bases in New Guinea and on Bouganville.

Possible Optional Mission for the Allies:

"Black Sheep One"

Among the Allied forces assaulting Rabaul are the pilots of VMF-214, the legendary Black Sheep, led by Greg "Gramps" Boyington on his race to break the USMC victory record. The Allied commander may choose one Corsair pilot to represent Boyington. Any victories he scores earns an additional points bonus. However if he is shot down by the Japanese the Axis receives a point bonus.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2008, 03:17:46 PM »
Just FYI, Sax... Raptor is currently working on exactly this map.

Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2008, 03:52:07 PM »
What's the map scaling, btw?

I'd thought it would be REALLY cool if the port and airbase of Rabaul was built on the map to actually look LIKE the historical port at the time.

Oh, and a mix of dirt, coral, and pierced-steel plank runways. :D

Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2008, 04:21:31 PM »
It's pretty close to 1:1.
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2008, 04:36:51 PM »
Sweet, any screenshots?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline lowZX14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
      • Home of the 325th Checkertails VFG
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2008, 09:25:13 AM »
Ohhhhhhh yeah, a good 'ole USMC slug fest, I so hope we're allies when that one rolls around, oohrahhh :rock
lowZX14
325th Checkertails VFG
www.325thcheckertailsvfg.com

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2008, 09:47:41 AM »
I don't think any N1K's were in service in November 1943.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline lowZX14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
      • Home of the 325th Checkertails VFG
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2008, 10:05:42 AM »
Among the Allied forces assaulting Rabaul are the pilots of VMF-214, the legendary Black Sheep, led by Greg "Gramps" Boyington on his race to break the USMC victory record. The Allied commander may choose one Corsair pilot to represent Boyington. Any victories he scores earns an additional points bonus. However if he is shot down by the Japanese the Axis receives a point bonus.

Except his name was Gregory "Pappy" Boyington
lowZX14
325th Checkertails VFG
www.325thcheckertailsvfg.com

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2008, 10:22:57 AM »
Pappy was a media creation and the pilots under his command never actually used it. They called him "Gramps."
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2008, 10:27:18 AM »
I don't think any N1K's were in service in November 1943.

Earlier variants, not the 2J that we have might have been. Then again, there may not have been any Ki-84s, either.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline lowZX14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
      • Home of the 325th Checkertails VFG
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2008, 10:32:55 AM »
Pappy was a media creation and the pilots under his command never actually used it. They called him "Gramps."
This is true, I am mistaken
lowZX14
325th Checkertails VFG
www.325thcheckertailsvfg.com

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2008, 10:54:21 AM »
Earlier variants, not the 2J that we have might have been. Then again, there may not have been any Ki-84s, either.

I don't know a lot about Japanese aircraft, but the Wiki article implies that even the N1K1-J didn't enter service until early 1944.

The sources listed at the end of the article:

Quote
    * Francillon, René J. Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War. London: Putnam & Company Ltd., 1970. second edition 1979. ISBN 0-370-30251-6.
    * Francillon, René J. Kawanishi Kyofu, Shiden and Shiden Kai Variants (Aircraft in Profile 213). Windsor, Berkshire, UK: Profile Publications Ltd., 1971.
    * Galbiati, Fabio. "Battaglia Aerea del 19 Marzo su Kure.(in Italian)" Storia Militare magazine, Albertelli edizioni, N.166, July 2007.
    * Green, William. Warplanes of the Second World War, Volume Three: Fighters. London: Macdonald & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., 1961 (seventh impression 1973). ISBN 0-356-01447-9.
    * Koseski, Krystian. Kawanishi N1K1/N1k2-J "Shiden/Kai" (in Polish). Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Susei, 1991. ISBN 83-900216-0-9.
    * Mondey, David. The Hamlyn Concise Guide to Axis Aircraft of World War II. London: Bounty Books, 2006. ISBN 0-753714-60-4.
    * Sakaida, Henry. Imperial Japanese Navy Aces, 1937-45. Botley, Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 1998. ISBN 1-85532-727-9.
    * Sakaida, Henry, and Koji Takaki. Genda's Blade: Japan's Squadron of Aces: 343 Kokutai. Hersham, Surrey, UK: Classic Publications, 2003. ISBN 1-903223-25-3.


The article on the Ki-84 is not as thorough.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2008, 10:57:27 AM by Anaxogoras »
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2008, 10:55:55 AM »
N1K-2J production:

Quote
Shiden-Kai Production
Month    Number Produced
1943    1 (prototype)
January 1944    1
February 1944    1
March 1944    1
April 1944    2
May 1944    1
June 1944    1
July 1944    3
August 1944    2
September 1944    1
October 1944    6
November 1944    17
December 1944    31
January 1945    35
February 1945    47
March 1945    59
April 1945    83
May 1945    83 (20 by Himeji factory)
June 1945    25
July 1945    18
August 1945    10
Total    428
Sources: Pages 29 and 63-68 of Genda's Blade
and Aircraft in profile 213, page 64.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2008, 10:58:23 AM »
I think it's safe to say the N1K2-J does not belong in your proposed FSO.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4679
Re: FSO Proposal
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2008, 11:00:05 AM »
There were no N1K1s or KI-84s at Rabaul.  We really need the A6M3, KI-43 and KI-44 for these mid to latemid war setups.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.