One, people will *inevetiably* fly the rides that more or less have the most natural advantages hardwired into the flight model. Complaining about it is like complaining because Coke has a bigger share of the market than Big Red or something. (This coming from a Big Red man.)
Now, do you dislike seeing so many Spits, N1Ks, Las, and P-51s because they are so easy for you to kill that you are bored? If that is the case, do you think you would be less bored if the same opposition was flying 110Cs?
Or do you dislike seeing so many of them because it is difficult to survive against large numbers of them in a mid-war ride? If so, I must ask, isn't extra challenge be the point of flying a lesser ride?
Furthermore, if people dislike seeing the same rides over and over, why is there so much resistance to assigning a light perk price to the more hyper-modeled rides. Or changing the scoring system? Personally, I think if two guys have the similiar k/d, k/s, k/t, and hit%, only one has it in a Spit16, and the other has it in a Fw-190A5, the guy flying the more difficult ride ought to be "scored" quite abit higher.