Author Topic: another junker  (Read 755 times)

Offline yodad585

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
another junker
« on: November 21, 2008, 03:24:36 PM »
we need another junker. ju 52 the info is right here.
Role Military transport aircraft
Manufacturer Junkers
First flight 13 October 1930
Introduced 1931
Primary users Luftwaffe
Spain
France
Switzerland
Produced 1931–1945 (German production)
1945–1947 (France)
1945–1952 (Spain)
Number built 4,845 ...
it is another goon and could carry upto 17 paratroopers it has 3 engines and i think we need it


Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15834
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: another junker
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2008, 03:33:29 PM »
Ahh, gotta love the copy and pastes from Wiki.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: another junker
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2008, 03:36:37 PM »
It'll still carry 10 troops dude. In the real world, SkyTrain could carry 28 btw.

There really is no practical reason for adding another troop transport (in the air)......... BUT, I do like the idea of having choices!

See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: another junker
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2008, 03:37:29 PM »
it has 3 engines

You just gotta LOVE a reason to have it like that!
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: another junker
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2008, 03:38:36 PM »
Extra engine, yet still slower then the Goonie Bird..... Go figure! 
You just gotta LOVE a reason to have it like that!
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: another junker
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2008, 04:21:17 PM »
How about a Heinkel? A Heinkel-111. :D
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline CAVPFCDD

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 535
Re: another junker
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2008, 04:51:29 PM »
i prefered the suggestion of the russian goon that had a gun on it
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Georgia I eat a peach for peace." - Duane Allman

"Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil." Jerry Garcia

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: another junker
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2008, 02:27:53 PM »
How about a Heinkel? A Heinkel-111. :D

surprising yet another he111 hijack from you


ju-52 +1
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline yodad585

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: another junker
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2008, 03:04:05 PM »
i prefered the suggestion of the russian goon that had a gun on it
it has a gun in the back by the rudder kind of like the ball turret

Offline RMrider

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
      • http://
Re: another junker
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2008, 03:15:49 PM »
JU 51:

has a gun

Is German  :rock

ANDDD most important, is sooo damn ugly, its SEXIII.  :t

 :salute
MDStampf - JG11 'Sonderstaffel'
Sgt Stampfli, USMC


Offline NEARY

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 655
      • The 18th FG Killer Chihuahuas
Re: another junker
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2008, 04:20:23 PM »
The ju-52 may be slower but it was an important part of the war.
it could be used in the AVA and The SEA.

here is a picture


The 18th FG Killer Chihuahuas.since tour 97.        CO: KCTHUNDR(me)
 ( NEARY tours 96- 107) 2nd in command: Penguin. www.freewebs.com/18thfg   in game i.d.: KCTHUNDR

OBey Teh ChIHuaHUa!!! BWAHAHAHAHA!!!11!!!1

Offline yodad585

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: another junker
« Reply #12 on: November 23, 2008, 03:02:15 PM »
exactly get rid of goon we got now cause the thing is deffence less and throw the junker in. makes everything alot easier and i can gun instead of trying to out run bullets that i cant throw back. come on the goon we have now is like throwing a clay pigeon up for a marksmen. clay pigeon is plane the marksmen is all ground deffences n other planes. we need to get rid of the ticking time bomb, and put in a goon with armament

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: another junker
« Reply #13 on: November 23, 2008, 03:10:53 PM »
Get rid of the goon? Why? The only way you get shot down in it is if you try to take a base that still has fighters over it, or ack/gvs still up. You don't need a gun if you're not going to need to shoot anything. Plus, isn't the JU-52's gun just another 7.92mm gun? by the time you do enough damage to the plane on your six you'll be in the tower. JU-52 would be a great addition, but why would you get rid of the C-47??

Offline Lye-El

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1466
Re: another junker
« Reply #14 on: November 23, 2008, 03:43:16 PM »
exactly get rid of goon we got now cause the thing is deffence less and throw the junker in. <snip> and put in a goon with armament

A Goon i.e. Gooney Bird, IS a C-47.


i dont got enough perkies as it is and i like upen my lancs to kill 1 dang t 34 or wirble its fun droping 42 bombs