Author Topic: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.  (Read 1115 times)

Offline drdeathx

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
      • [URL=http://s435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/?action=view&current=woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg][IMG]http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/th_woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« on: January 04, 2009, 12:01:18 PM »
I used to run 2 ATI(512) 3870 Video cards(Crossfired) and Benchmarked 15,500 with 3DMARK06. With My Nvidea GTX 280 I barely hit 14,000. Any feedback?

Running

AMD 9850 BE Quad Core
MSI K9A2 MB
Windows XP
Nvidea GTX280
See Rule #6

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17933
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2009, 08:04:44 AM »
Running ....

P5K-E MB
Intel DuoCore 3.0 GHz E6850
3 gigz Ram
Nvidia GeForce 8800GTS
Windows XP

BenchMarks at 17,250 with out any over clocking.

Offline drdeathx

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
      • [URL=http://s435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/?action=view&current=woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg][IMG]http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/th_woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2009, 04:05:10 PM »
I was wondering why I benched 1500 lower with GTX280 from 2(512) 3870 cards crossfired?
See Rule #6

Offline Fulmar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
      • Aces High Movie Database
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2009, 05:12:30 PM »
It's synthetic?
In game callsign: not currently flying
Flying off and on since Warbirds
Aces High Movies available at www.derstuhl.net/ahmd2 - no longer aceshighmovies.com - not updated either

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2009, 05:26:33 PM »
Tomshardware.com shows exactly what you found: two 3870s in crossfire (CF) are a bit faster than one GTX280. 

(http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/3DMark06-v1-1-0-3DMark-Score,794.html)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2009, 07:13:14 PM »
Running ....

P5K-E MB
Intel DuoCore 3.0 GHz E6850
3 gigz Ram
Nvidia GeForce 8800GTS
Windows XP

BenchMarks at 17,250 with out any over clocking.

Exact components except I have 4GB of Mem (DDR2-1066) and an E8400.   

I'm sure I'm around that.   Not to mention I have the KO edition 8800GTS.   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline TilDeath

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1199
      • TD Computer Systems
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2009, 01:24:29 AM »
Running ....

P5K-E MB
Intel DuoCore 3.0 GHz E6850
3 gigz Ram
Nvidia GeForce 8800GTS
Windows XP

BenchMarks at 17,250 with out any over clocking.
Thats a real good score... you got a link to the ORB site so I can check out the drivers for that score?

Offline drdeathx

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
      • [URL=http://s435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/?action=view&current=woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg][IMG]http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq77/AAdeath/th_woodland-critters-christmas-1024x76.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2009, 02:40:07 AM »
lol FUGITIVE, What multiplier did you use for that score. Impossible and I will go to ORB to check it out!


Here is a screen shot from someone who had your processor OC'd to 3.6Ghz! I also gave you the doubt with a 640mb card.I think you bench 3DMARK06 at about 12,000-13,000 by the other scores I analyzed.



« Last Edit: January 06, 2009, 02:58:41 AM by drdeathx »
See Rule #6

Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6364
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2009, 06:09:38 AM »
Man, does that take a while to download. From my experience if the norm is 12,000 (I have no idea of that) I will be in at 11900.  :rofl :rofl

Okay, ran it. Benched 10742. How and the heck are you guys getting those scores. I have an 8500 runing at 3.5 ghz with a Radeon ATI 3850 overclocked. What am I missing here? When it ran just the cpu tests it showed 0 to 3 fps. That surprised the heck out of me.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2009, 07:43:37 AM by Getback »

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline TilDeath

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1199
      • TD Computer Systems
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2009, 07:59:25 AM »
Man, does that take a while to download. From my experience if the norm is 12,000 (I have no idea of that) I will be in at 11900.  :rofl :rofl

Okay, ran it. Benched 10742. How and the heck are you guys getting those scores. I have an 8500 runing at 3.5 ghz with a Radeon ATI 3850 overclocked. What am I missing here? When it ran just the cpu tests it showed 0 to 3 fps. That surprised the heck out of me.
I dont believe some of the scores posted are true.  I have an almost identical system to a poster here and my processor is OC to 3.6GHz and FSB at 1600 and 8800GTX OCed and I can only get 12423 out of it.  Thats with all normal settings 1280 x 1024, not turning my video down to 800 x 600.  You can link to your scores like here is one of mine at 22k http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9184755  again all normal settings so the score counts.  No one else has access to my score unless they copy it from here.

I have scores ranging from 11k up to 29k (not published, going for a top ten listing and not gonna give myself away)

Offline TilDeath

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1199
      • TD Computer Systems
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2009, 10:13:46 AM »
Man, does that take a while to download. From my experience if the norm is 12,000 (I have no idea of that) I will be in at 11900.  :rofl :rofl

Okay, ran it. Benched 10742. How and the heck are you guys getting those scores. I have an 8500 runing at 3.5 ghz with a Radeon ATI 3850 overclocked. What am I missing here? When it ran just the cpu tests it showed 0 to 3 fps. That surprised the heck out of me.
Yea it does and Vantage is even slower.  You think your score is low in 3DMark06, try Vantage (FutureMark Corp also).  Here is a screen shot of system I just built for a client.  This systems score is within 70 some percent of the world record on their site and we havent started tweaking it yet.  Will it be good enough, no, I'm sorry to say but it will get pretty dang close.  Mid 80% of the record.


Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6364
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2009, 01:10:35 PM »
I run my monitor at 1920 x 1200. Does that have an effect?

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2009, 03:13:57 PM »
Yes.  Most people quote the 3DMark06 at its default resolution of 1280x1024.  At higher resolution you'll get lower ratings.  Also, make sure you check your video card drivers settings to see if they are overriding AA or AF etc settings.  You want to select "Application Settings", or, to get maximum ratings, turn AA and AF off.  If you have your drivers set to force AA to say 4X you'll get a lower rating.

It's normal for the CPU test to appear glacially slow.

My results for 3GHz E8400, stock HD4850, 4G RAM are about 12,000

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17933
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2009, 03:52:32 PM »
Sorry, my first post was 3Dmark05, I did do the 06, both are below.






Offline Fulmar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
      • Aces High Movie Database
Re: 3DMARK06 Benchmark.
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2009, 04:16:23 PM »
Wow the fastest for '05 was a 6.4 ghz overclock.
In game callsign: not currently flying
Flying off and on since Warbirds
Aces High Movies available at www.derstuhl.net/ahmd2 - no longer aceshighmovies.com - not updated either