Author Topic: F8-F  (Read 2913 times)

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: F8-F
« Reply #60 on: February 13, 2009, 12:39:12 AM »
The F7F and F8F fit the post-war ("korea", I would say) era.

The F7F is no more relevant to WW2's "feel" or "era" than the Do355 Pfeil, the Horten flying wing, the cross-continental Nazi jet bomber, and many other Luft '46 ideas. None had any impact on the war, and none saw any legit action during the war (not counting LW prototypes).

The F7F is much different than the gadget planes of the Luft '46 group.  Whether or not it has a place in Aces High is a different discussion.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: F8-F
« Reply #61 on: February 13, 2009, 02:18:52 AM »
While I think there are many aircraft that are more urgently needed.

I think there is a case for the F7F and F8F to be included. Looking at the USN historical site specifically the USN aircraft location report for 4 August, 1945 http://www.history.navy.mil/a-record/ww-ii/loc-ac/1945/aug1945/4-8-45.pdf
I was able to find the following;

F8F's
48 F8F-1's with VF-19 at Santa Rosa ready for deployment with the CVG 19 Air Group USS Hornet
1 F8F-1 with CASU5 in San Diego
1 F8F-1 with Flag ComAirPac

for a total of 50 aircraft

F7F's
1 F7F-2P's with VMD-254
6 F7F-3P's with VMD-254
2 F7F-1's with VMFN-531
2 F7F-3's with VMFN-531
11 F7F-2N's with VMFN-531
1 F7F-1 with VMFN-532
3 F7F-3's with VMFN-532
6 F7F-2N's with VMFN-532
1 F7F-1 with VMF-911
1 F7F-1 with VMF-912
5 F7F-3's with VMF-912

for a total of 39 aircraft

While I completely agree that neither saw any combat, they were deployed in squadron strength, and ready for combat before the end of World War II.

Just one other point about the F7F, the 4 20mm cannon's are in the wing root's, only the 4 50cal machine gun's were in the nose.

 :salute  Baumer
HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: F8-F
« Reply #62 on: February 13, 2009, 02:49:44 AM »
While I think there are many aircraft that are more urgently needed.

I think there is a case for the F7F and F8F to be included.

(numbers removed)

Aside from not meeting the criteria for inclusion mandated by the game designer and administrator.....


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: F8-F
« Reply #63 on: February 13, 2009, 03:11:25 AM »
Did the P51H see combat?  Because it was in one of the old polls for next AC to add, along with the P47N/M and Ta152.
It's still their game.  They can change the rules and inclusion criteria whenever they want.  I personaly wouldn't ever fly the yaba-daba-dooo contraptions like the Dewotine and spanish civil war biplanes (or whatever; tho I did say the same for the 25H and now it's one of my top 3 favs) but those tickle some people's fun the same way tearing around in late war monsters does it for others.  Adding a couple of each from these extremes along with a majority of more historicaly relevant models isn't going to kill AH, on the contrary. It would enrich the context.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: F8-F
« Reply #64 on: February 13, 2009, 03:22:06 AM »
he doesn't want a dewoitine !!! KILL HIMMMM  :t
now posting as SirNuke

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: F8-F
« Reply #65 on: February 13, 2009, 09:46:44 AM »
AWwrgwy thank you for only quoting part of what I said, and not including the rest of the context. I believe that these two aircraft meet 2 of the 3 criteria that HTC has established for inclusion in the game. I also said they failed to meet the third.


While I completely agree that neither saw any combat, they were deployed in squadron strength, and ready for combat before the end of World War II.


Speaking with, and listening to HiTech and Pyro at the con, there were several discussions about expanding the plane set. Both towards WWI and Korea, so while they have clear guidelines for what aircraft have been including in the game. It appeared that, maybe, they were considering expanding their scope, and possibly be willing to consider aircraft that they wouldn't have in the past.

HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: F8-F
« Reply #66 on: February 13, 2009, 12:47:05 PM »
Woops.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2009, 12:49:00 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: F8-F
« Reply #67 on: February 13, 2009, 06:00:16 PM »
AWwrgwy thank you for only quoting part of what I said, and not including the rest of the context. I believe that these two aircraft meet 2 of the 3 criteria that HTC has established for inclusion in the game. I also said they failed to meet the third.

Speaking with, and listening to HiTech and Pyro at the con, there were several discussions about expanding the plane set. Both towards WWI and Korea, so while they have clear guidelines for what aircraft have been including in the game. It appeared that, maybe, they were considering expanding their scope, and possibly be willing to consider aircraft that they wouldn't have in the past.



I imagine Combat is kind of an important criteria for a Combat Sim.  Did the F8F even see combat in Korea?  As I understand it the remaining active F8F squadrons at the time were based in the Atlantic and did not.



wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: F8-F
« Reply #68 on: February 13, 2009, 06:35:52 PM »
I believe the only combat the F8F was with French Air Force in IndoChina and I know the Thai Air Force had them...and I think we gave some to the Vietnamese air foce too.
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS