Author Topic: WW1 or Vietnam?  (Read 1614 times)

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2009, 10:29:12 PM »
He's contracting 'it' and 'has', not 'it' and 'is'.
Right. I seem to forget that a lot.
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2009, 11:14:10 PM »
He's contracting 'it' and 'has', not 'it' and 'is'.

Eskimo is right. It should be Its, not It's.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2009, 11:24:18 PM »
'Its' is possessive.
'It's' is a contraction.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2009, 11:30:32 PM »
'Its' is possessive.
'It's' is a contraction.

I think its the other way around.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110

Offline AirFlyer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1210
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2009, 11:55:08 PM »
To have a proper sentence, you must have a subject.
:D

Fair enough, was just proving a point though. I on the other hand don't usually go around correcting peoples English unless it's completely atrocious.
Tours: Airflyer to 69 - 77 | Dustin57 92 - 100 | Spinnich 100 - ?
"You'll always get exactly what you deserve." Neil

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2009, 04:54:06 PM »
 AW had Korea with jets, p51s etc. It was empty most of the time. I flew it several times and it was a blast but the arena seldom had over 10 people in it at a time. I don't think there has been a successful Vietnam era flyer nor has there been a successful mass online jet game. Several have been on but they haven't lasted.

 As far as WW1. If its done well the people will play it. I like WW1 so I would probably play it a lot. I left AH before to go to WB just for the WW1 game. But after awhile I left because there really were only a couple of decent planes in their plane set. The only planes that flew decent was the Fokker Dr1 and the Camel. The Fokker D7 was a dog there and it was supposed to be one of the best planes of WW1. Apparently using the same WW2 engine didn't cross over too well.  It was fun but extremely limited. Now if AH builds a comprehensive game with flyable zepps, bombers, and maybe even some WW1 tanks it might be interesting. WW1 (and most other eras) depends on the game play though, to much reality and it bogs down, too little and its an arcade game.

 For me the deciding factor irregardless of the era would be how good the game play is.

Offline Marauding Conan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #22 on: January 26, 2009, 05:03:24 PM »
AW had Korea with jets, p51s etc. It was empty most of the time. I flew it several times and it was a blast but the arena seldom had over 10 people in it at a time. I don't think there has been a successful Vietnam era flyer nor has there been a successful mass online jet game. Several have been on but they haven't lasted.

 As far as WW1. If its done well the people will play it. I like WW1 so I would probably play it a lot. I left AH before to go to WB just for the WW1 game. But after awhile I left because there really were only a couple of decent planes in their plane set. The only planes that flew decent was the Fokker Dr1 and the Camel. The Fokker D7 was a dog there and it was supposed to be one of the best planes of WW1. Apparently using the same WW2 engine didn't cross over too well.  It was fun but extremely limited. Now if AH builds a comprehensive game with flyable zepps, bombers, and maybe even some WW1 tanks it might be interesting. WW1 (and most other eras) depends on the game play though, to much reality and it bogs down, too little and its an arcade game.

 For me the deciding factor irregardless of the era would be how good the game play is.

Second this one. :aok

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2009, 05:37:59 PM »
WW1 > Korea

Korea> Vietnam

Vietnam > Modern Combat

WWII > Everything, but WWI (which it ties)


^^^
My opinons.

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #24 on: January 26, 2009, 05:39:38 PM »
WW1 > Korea

Korea> Vietnam

Vietnam > Modern Combat

WWII > Everything, but WWI (which it ties)


^^^
My opinons.

I concur.
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline Thor84

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2009, 12:27:39 AM »
korea, no missles.
formerly known as Thor84

NOW LTARsuly

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
RE: something? Idk...
« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2009, 12:49:55 AM »
AW had Korea with jets, p51s etc. It was empty most of the time. I flew it several times and it was a blast but the arena seldom had over 10 people in it at a time. I don't think there has been a successful Vietnam era flyer nor has there been a successful mass online jet game. Several have been on but they haven't lasted.
Thats quite true, the most ive ever seen for a Jet game of any jet era had about 60 people and it was shutdown 5 years ago i think. What was the name? Not a popular game, thats for sure.

Anyway, Korea was still mostly dog fighting but at high speeds past 500mph, and AH has like 1500 players at most, it could work. But if HTC is thinking about WWI then they probably have already planned a small structure or rough draft of a beginning for it. Im all in for Korea or WWI!

-FYB
Most skill based sport? -
The sport of understanding women.

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2009, 03:20:58 AM »
Neither. This World War Two sim is not finished yet....

What Xasthur said, but at the end of the day I would rather fly jet powered killing machine then a lawn mower with wings.  :O



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline skullman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 432
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2009, 12:33:36 PM »
If I had to choose I vote for wwI .viet nam had very little as far as gun package besides the crusaders and the sidewinders had a lot of problems as most went wild and would not lock on.WWI seems to be a better choice as far as air combat-Korea would be a good choice as far as being able to add tanks and other things to use the same kind of tatical play.Plus the air play would be able to satisfy alot more people with jets and prop driven planes
been there destroyed that

Offline Chilli

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4278
Re: WW1 or Vietnam?
« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2009, 02:48:21 AM »
Okay, how would this work?   Would they
  • A) Make an entirely new game
  • B) Make another arena
  • C) Make another arena and do away with EW. MW and merge the split LW arenas

My vote is for C, oh,..... and WWI hands down!